泥石流风险管理和土地规划

doi:10.13826/j.cnki.cn65-1103/x.2002.02.012

干旱区地理 ›› 2002, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 155-159.doi: 10.13826/j.cnki.cn65-1103/x.2002.02.012

泥石流风险管理和土地规划

刘希林^{1, 2}, 莫多闻²

1.中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都 610041;
2.北京大学城市与环境学系, 北京 100871

收稿日期:2001-07-23 修回日期:2002-01-20 发布日期:2025-12-31
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(重点项目49831010;重大项目59890200;面上项目49771004)

DEBRIS FLOW RISK MANAGEMENT AND LAND PLANNING

LIU Xi-lin¹, MO Duo-wen²

1. Institute of Mountain Haz ards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China;
2. Department of Urban and Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2001-07-23 Revised:2002-01-20 Online:2025-12-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 泥石流风险定量表达为泥石流危险度和泥石流易损度的乘积。泥石流风险管理的目的是降低风险或转移风险。泥石流风险管理主要有三种途径:降低危险度, 降低易损度和灾害保险。在泥石流风险管理的实际操作中, 往往要标本兼治, 三管齐下, 采取降低风险和转移风险的综合措施。泥石流风险与土地规划关系密切, 风险评价可为泥石流易发地区的土地可持续利用提供科学决策的依据。

关键词: 泥石流, 风险管理, 土地规划

Abstract: Debris flow risk is expressed as the product of debris flow hazard and debris flow vulnerability. Debris flow risk management is to reduce or to shift debris flow risk. Generally there are three ways to manage debris flow risk：to reduce debris flow hazard, to reduce debris flow vulnerability and debris flow insurance. In practice of the risk management, the above three ways usually are comprehensively taken to reduce and to shift debris flow risk. Debris flow risk is also associated with the land use planning in debris flow prone areas. Thus Debris flow risk assessment and management can provide the scientific supports for the sustainable use in the prone areas of debris flows.

Key words: debris flow, risk management, land planning

中图分类号:

P642.23

刘希林, 莫多闻. 泥石流风险管理和土地规划[J]. 干旱区地理, 2002, 25(2): 155-159.

LIU Xi-lin, MO Duo-wen. DEBRIS FLOW RISK MANAGEMENT AND LAND PLANNING[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2002, 25(2): 155-159.

参考文献

[1] Baynes F. Problems associated with geological characterization for quantitative landslide risk assessment[A]. In: D. M. Cruden and R. Fell (eds.), Landslide Risk Assessment[C], Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema, 1997, 153~163.
[2] Budgen P [J]. The engineer at risk -a proposal to use hazard and risk assessment as a general management tool[J]. Engineering management Journal, 1999, 9(6): 265~272.
[3] Fell R. Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1994, 31: 261~272.
[4] Finlay P J, Fell R. Landslide: risk perception and acceptance[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1997, 34: 169~188.
[5] 刘希林, 王小丹. 云南省泥石流风险区划[J]. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(3): 104~107.
[6] 刘希林. 区域泥石流风险评价研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2000, 9(1): 54~61.
[7] United Nations, Department of Humanitarian Affairs. Mitigating Natural Disasters: Phenomena, Effects and Options -A Manual for Policy Makers and Planners[M]. New York: United Nations, 1991. 1~164.
[8] Lundgren l. Environmental Geology [M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Incorporation, 1986, 1~576.
[9] 周必凡, 李德基, 罗德富, 吕儒仁, 杨庆溪. 泥石流防治指南[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991. 1~217.
[10] 吴积善, 田连权, 康志成, 张有富, 刘江. 泥石流及其综合防治[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993. 1~332.
[11] 杜榕桓, 康志成, 陈循谦, 朱平一. 云南小江泥石流综合考察与防治规划研究[M]. 重庆: 科学技术文献出版社重庆分社, 1987, 1~287.
[12] 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所. 泥石流研究与防治[M]. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 1989. 1~346.
[13] 唐邦兴, 柳素清. 四川省阿坝藏族羌族自治州泥石流及其防治研究[M]. 成都: 成都科技大学出版社, 1993. 1~179.
[14] Davies T. R. H. Using hydroscience and hydrotechnical engineering to reduce debris flow hazards[A]. In: C. Chen(ed.), Debris -Flow Hazards Mitigations: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment [C], New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1997. 787~810.
[15] Davies T. R. H. Research needs for debris flow disaster prevention [A]. Proceedings of Hydraulic Engineering'93, San Francisco [C]. New York: ASCE, 1993. 1284~1289.
[16] 东川泥石流队. 泥石流毁坝分析-以东川蒋家沟为例[A]. 全国泥石流防治经验交流会文集编审组, 全国泥石流防治经验交流会论文集[C], 重庆: 科学技术文献出版社重庆分社, 1983. 103~107.
[17] 游勇, 吴积善, 程尊兰. 蒋家沟下游导流堤冲决原因及防治对策[J]. 灾害学, 2001. 16(2): 14~17.
[18] Arnould M. Geological hazards-insurance and legal and technical aspects[J]. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology, 1976. 14: 263~274.
[19] Tobin G, Montz B E. Natural Hazards: Explanation and Integration [M] New York: The Guilford Press, 1997. 1~388.
[20] Eldeen M. T. Predisaster physical planning: integration of disaster risk analysis into physical planninga-case study in Tunisia[J]. Disasters, 1980. 4(2): 211~222.
[21] Menoni S, Pergalani F. An attempt to link risk assessment with land use planning: a recent experience in Italy[J]. Disaster Prevention and Management, 1996. 5(1): 6~21.

泥石流风险管理和土地规划

DEBRIS FLOW RISK MANAGEMENT AND LAND PLANNING

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郭光玲, 郭瑞, 顾箭峰, 李军, 郭鸿, 陈能远. 灰色理论在舟曲南屿沟泥石流灾害危险性评价中的应用研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(1): 20-26.
[2]	程瑛, 黄武斌, 沙宏娥. 甘肃岷县两次强降水致山洪泥石流灾害特征对比分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(3): 443-448.
[3]	费杜秋, 刘峰贵, 周强, 陈琼, 吴林. 青藏铁路沿线滑坡泥石流灾害风险分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(2): 345-352.
[4]	陈剑，崔之久. 云南白马雪山垭口早更新世泥石流的发育特征及其古气候和构造意义[J]. 干旱区地理, 2014, 37(2): 203-211.
[5]	焦方谦，赵新生，陈川. 证据权模型在泥石流灾害易发性评价中的应用[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(6): 1111-1124.
[6]	王青,，严登华，翁白莎,，冯婧,，史璇,. 北美洲干旱灾害应对策略及其对中国的启示[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(02): 332-338.
[7]	刘洪江,唐川,崔鹏. GIS支持下的东川区泥石流危险度区划[J]. 干旱区地理, 2005, 28(4): 445-449.
[8]	李德,陈广才,谢平,陈曦,杨德刚,钱静. 乌鲁木齐市无资料地区山洪泥石流临界雨量推求[J]. 干旱区地理, 2005, 28(4): 441-444.
[9]	赵兴有, 戴新俊. 新疆阿勒泰市城市山地灾害及减灾对策研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2005, 28(2): 234-238.
[10]	贺明静, 孙根年, 宋咏梅. 陕西西安翠华山地质景观遗迹成因探析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2005, 28(2): 145-149.
[11]	马东涛, 崔鹏, 杨坤, 王掌军. 新藏公路新疆段泥石流灾害初探[J]. 干旱区地理, 2003, 26(4): 349-354.
[12]	李金海, 钱金平, 刘杰. 泥石流灾害的经济评估体系与方法探讨[J]. 干旱区地理, 2000, 23(2): 182-185.
[13]	胡汝骥, 马虹, 吴荣生, 胡大庆. 新疆境内的泥石流[J]. 干旱区地理, 1991, 14(2): 32-40.