生态服务付费存在的问题及生态工人机制探讨

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.02.21

干旱区地理 ›› 2020, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 466-473.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.02.21

生态服务付费存在的问题及生态工人机制探讨

苏芳¹，宋妮妮¹，尚海洋²

1 陕西科技大学经济与管理学院，陕西西安 710021； 2 西北政法大学商学院，陕西西安 710063

收稿日期:2019-05-13 修回日期:2019-09-16 出版日期:2020-03-25 发布日期:2020-03-25
作者简介:苏芳(1981-)，女，甘肃兰州人，教授，从事生态经济及区域可持续发展研究.E-mail:sufang@sust.edu.cn
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(19YJAZH076)；陕西省千人计划青年项目；陕西省软科学研究计划一般项目(2018KRM065)；国家社会科学基金项目(17CJY028);甘肃省自然科学基金（1610RJ2A096）资助

Theoretical and practical problems in payments of ecoservice and discussion on the mechanism of ecoworkers

SU Fang¹,SONG Ni-ni¹,SHANG Hai-yang²

1 School of Economics and Management,Shaanxi University of Science and Technology,Xi’an 710021,Shaanxi,China; 2 School of Businees,Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi’an 710063,Shaanxi,China

Received:2019-05-13 Revised:2019-09-16 Online:2020-03-25 Published:2020-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态服务付费（PES）的理论源于新古典福利经济学，隐含了对生态服务定价、市场将自动演变出生态服务买家和卖家的假设。由于缺少生态服务的现实市场，这种假设很难奏效，需要重新审视大多数生态服务付费项目有关福利经济学的基本理论假设，需要创新生态补偿的新方式。同时，坚持生态惠民、生态利民、生态为民，是绿水青山就是金山银山发展理念的核心内涵，是对以人为中心的环境保护与经济发展的生动诠释。特别是对于重要的生态脆弱区来讲，生态环境保护工程的实施更应关注域内原住民的发展。通过回顾PES的理论演变和总结国内外典型PES案例实践，分析了PES在理论假设与实践方面存在的脱节问题，并发现通过PES项目实施中创建的社会网络和就业为当地参与者增加了新的创收机会。在此基础上，通过引导当地住民参与生态保护与修复，探讨了生态保护、经济发展和民生改善的协调联动良性生态工人机制的形成。

关键词: 生态服务付费, 生态工人机制, 生态补偿, 国家公园

Abstract: The theoretical root of payments for environmental services (PES) lies in neoclassical welfare economics,which implies that once the pricing of environmental services is set,the market will automatically modify the assumptions of buyers and sellers of environmental services.However,this assumption is difficult to accomplish and requires a reexamination of the basic assumptions of welfare economics theory in most projects involving PES.This paper reviews the evolution of the PES theory and summarizes typical PES case practices at home and abroad.Further,the problems of PES in theory and practice are discussed.It is found that some government initiatives that are implemented via the social network complementary to PES practices through various forms provided by PES (i.e.,physical,technical,and cash) help local participants create new revenue opportunities.This PES implementation promotes the formation of coordination linkage,benign mechanisms of ecological protection,economic development,and improvement of people’s livelihoods.

Key words: payments for ecosystem services, ecoworker mechanism, ecological compensation mechanism, Nation park

苏芳, 宋妮妮, 尚海洋.

生态服务付费存在的问题及生态工人机制探讨 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(2): 466-473.

SU Fang, SONG Ni-ni, SHANG Hai-yang.

Theoretical and practical problems in payments of ecoservice and discussion on the mechanism of ecoworkers [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(2): 466-473.

参考文献［20］

［1］	SEN B.Drivers of escape and descent:Changing household fortunes in rural Bangladesh ［J］.World Development,2003,31(3):513-534.
［2］	PAN X L,XU L Y,YANG Z F,et al.Payments for ecosystem services in China:Policy,practice,and progress［J］.Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,158:200-208.
［3］	徐中民.甘肃省典型地区生态补偿机制研究［M］.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2011:1-194.［XU Zhongmin.Study on ecological compensation mechanism of typical areas in Gansu Province［M］.Beijing:China Financial & Economic Publishing House,2011:1-194.］
［4］	CHEN X,SHORTRIDGE A,LI A,et al.Assessing the effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services:An agentbased modeling approach［J］.Ecology and Society,2014,19(1):7.
［5］	MURADIAN R,CORBERA E,PASCUAL U,et al.Reconciling theory and practice:An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services［J］.Ecological Economics,2010,69(6):1202-1208.
［6］	WUNDER S,ENGEL S,PAGIOLA S.Taking stock:A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries［J］.Ecological Economics,2008,65(4):834-852.
［7］	张晏.国外生态补偿机制设计中的关键要素及启示［J］.中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(10):121-129.［ZHANG Yan.Key elements in designing mechanism for payments for ecosystem services abroad and the enlightenment［J］.China Population,Resources and Environment,2016,26(10):121-129.］
［8］	尚海洋,苏芳,徐中民,等.生态补偿的研究进展及其启示［J］.冰川冻土,2011,33(6):1435-1443.［SHANG Haiyang,SU Fang,XU Zhongmin,et al.A review of the eco-compensation study［J］.Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,2011,33(6):1435-1443.］
［9］	PETHERAM L,CAMPBELLB M.Listening to locals on payments for environmental services［J］.Journal of Environmental Management,2010,91(5):1139-1149.
［10］	HEGDE R,BULLG Q.Performance of an agro forestry based payments for environmental services project in Mozambique:A household level analysis［J］.Ecological Economics,2011,71(1):122,130.
［11］	SCHROEDER R A,MATZDORF B.Payments for ecosystem services:A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries［J］.Ecosystem Services,2013,6:16-30.
［12］	CATRINA A.Trenches like fences make good neighbours:Revenue sharing around Kibale National Park,Uganda［J］.Journal for Nature Conservation,2012,20(2):92-100.
［13］	SITATI N W,WALPOLE M J,SMITH R J,et al.Predicting spatial aspects of human:Elephant conflict［J］.Journal of Applied Ecology,2002,40(4):667-677.
［14］	NEERA M,SINGH.Payments for ecosystem services and the gift paradigm:Sharing the burden and joy of environmental care［J］.Ecological Economics,2015,117:53-61.
［15］	吴乐,孔德帅,靳乐山.中国生态保护补偿机制研究进展［J］.生态学报,2019,39(1):1-8.［WU Le,KONG Deshuai,JIN Leshan.Research on the progress of the ecocompensation mechanism in China［J］.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(1):1-8.］
［16］	胡旭珺,张惠远,郝海广,等.国际生态补偿实践经验及对我国的启示［J］.环境保护,2018,46(2):76-79.［HU Xujun,ZHANG Huiyuan,HAO Haiguang,et al.International progress on payments for ecosystem services and its implications for Chinese ecocompensation policies［J］.Environmental Protection,2018,46(2):76-79.］
［17］	丁杨.发展中国家典型环境服务付费实践案例分析——肯尼亚的经验与启示［J］.资源开发与市场,2017,33(1):74-79,99.［DING Yang.Analysis on practical cases of typical payment for environmental services in developing countries:Experience and enlightenment in Kenya［J］.Resource Development & Market,2017,33(1):74-79,99.］
［18］	张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估［J］.生态学报,2011,(11):1918-1926.［ZHANG Zhiqiang,XU Zhongmin,CHENG Guodong.Valuation of ecosystem services and natural capital［J］.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,(11):1918-1926.］
［19］	李国平,石涵予.退耕还林生态补偿标准、农户行为选择及损益［J］.中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(5):152-161.［LI Guoping,SHI Hanyu.The payment of grain to green project,the behavior choice of peasants and their gains and losses［J］.China Population,Resources and Environment,2015,25(5):152-161.］
［20］	尚海洋,丁杨,张志强.补偿标准参照的比较:机会成本与环境收益——以石羊河流域生态补偿为例［J］.中国沙漠,2016,36(3):830-835.［SHANG Haiyang,DING Yang,ZHANG Zhiqiang.The comparison of the opportunity cost and environmental benefits for ecological compensation standards:A case study in the Shiyanghe River Basin［J］.Journal of Desert Research,2016,36(3):830-835.］

[1]	赵力,张炜,刘楠,周典,孙培峰. 国家公园理念下区域生态旅游资源评价——以青海湖与祁连山毗邻区域为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(6): 1796-1809.
[2]	孙郧峰,仇韪,范经云. 新疆重点生态功能区生态补偿的空间选择研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(2): 565-573.
[3]	周俊俊, 杨美玲, 樊新刚, 肖成权, 贾红丽. 基于结构方程模型的农户生态补偿参与意愿影响因素研究——以宁夏盐池县为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(5): 1185-1194.
[4]	周立华, 侯彩霞. 北方农牧交错区草原利用与禁牧政策的关键问题研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(2): 354-362.
[5]	杨美玲, 朱志玲, 任凯丽. 限制开发生态区农户生态补偿参与意愿及其影响因素——以宁夏盐池县为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(3): 634-642.
[6]	张祥，蔡萌，杨传开. 天山托木尔峰南坡地区旅游发展模式及路径创新研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2014, 37(5): 1065-1073.

生态服务付费存在的问题及生态工人机制探讨

Theoretical and practical problems in payments of ecoservice and discussion on the mechanism of ecoworkers

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献［20］

相关文章 6

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

生态服务付费存在的问题及生态工人机制探讨

Theoretical and practical problems in payments of ecoservice and discussion on the mechanism of ecoworkers

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 ［20］

相关文章 6

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

参考文献［20］