收稿日期: 2023-07-19
修回日期: 2023-10-07
网络出版日期: 2024-07-09
基金资助
国家社会科学基金项目(19BGL141)
Evaluation of effectiveness and pathways for integrated development of rural cultural and tourism public services in Shanxi Province
Received date: 2023-07-19
Revised date: 2023-10-07
Online published: 2024-07-09
基于融合发展的自组织过程视角,从内外双驱力层面构建了评价体系,以山西省11个乡村文化和旅游公共服务机构功能融合试点村落为研究样本,综合评估两者服务融合发展水平,并通过定性比较分析探讨了其驱动路径。研究表明:(1) 内驱动力权重高于外驱力,资源融合、设施融合、机构融合是影响融合发展的关键因素。(2) 案例地整体处于局部融合发展阶段,揭示出其在融合动力、融合保障、融合深度及融合过程等发展上存在明显不足。(3) 内驱动力组合上,文旅公共服务平台被视为核心条件,反映出融合表现形式上具有“小而精”特征。外部驱动力上,文旅消费市场潜力是核心条件,反映出存在城乡社会服务融合发展短板。(4) 驱动路径分析提炼出了自上而下方式的统筹管理路径、改革供给模式的功能创新路径、扩宽融合渠道的资源共享路径、优化要素协同的融合保障路径。
关键词: 乡村; 文化和旅游公共服务融合; 成效评价; 驱动路径
张新成 , 王琳艳 , 高楠 . 山西省乡村文化和旅游公共服务融合发展成效评价及驱动路径研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024 , 47(6) : 1036 -1046 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.372
In this study, the integrated development of rural cultural and tourism public service institutions is examined from a self-organizing process perspective. Further, an evaluation system is developed that considers internal and external driving forces. By analyzing 11 pilot villages in the Shanxi Province, we comprehensively evaluated the development level of service integration and explored its driving path through a qualitative comparative analysis. The findings of this study are as follows: (1) The weight of internal driving forces is higher than that of external driving forces. The key factors affecting the development level are resource integration, facility integration, and institutional integration. (2) The current overall development is in the local integration stage, and there are significant shortcomings in terms of integration motivation, guarantee, depth, and process. (3) Regarding internal driving forces, the cultural and tourism public service platform is regarded as the core condition, highlighting the “small and refined” characteristics of the integrated expression form. For external driving forces, the potential of the cultural and tourism consumption market is the core condition, reflecting the shortcomings in the integrated development of urban and rural social services. (4) The analysis of driving paths identified four main paths: a top-down integrated management path, functional innovation path for reforming supply models, resource sharing path for expanding integration channels, and fusion guarantee path for optimizing factor collaboration.
[1] | 李国新, 李阳. 文化和旅游公共服务融合发展的思考[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(10): 29-33. |
[Li Guoxin, Li Yang. Conception of the integration and development of culture and tourism public service[J]. Library Journal, 2019, 38(10): 29-33.] | |
[2] | 陈小英, 曾志兰. 文化和旅游公共服务融合的理论与实践[J]. 福建论坛, 2020(12): 109-117. |
[Chen Xiaoying, Zeng Zhilan. Theory and practice of the integration of cultural and tourism public services[J]. Fujian Tribune, 2020(12): 109-117.] | |
[3] | 李秀娟. 文化和旅游公共服务体系建设研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2021. |
[Li Xiujuan. Research on the construction of cultural and tourism public service system[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2021.] | |
[4] | 陶俊, 杨敏红. 农村公共文化服务体系与乡村旅游的融合发展——以浙江德清总分馆改革为例[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(2): 45-55. |
[Tao Jun, Yang Minhong. Integrated development of rural public cultural services and rural tourism: Taking the reform practice of Deqing County’s general-and-branch library system for example[J]. Library Tribune, 2022, 42(2): 45-55.] | |
[5] | 毕绪龙. 公共文化服务和旅游融合发展的实践探索和路径思考[J]. 文化艺术研究, 2020, 13(4): 1-7. |
[Bi Xulong. The practice of and approaches to the integrated development of public cultural services and tourism[J]. Studies of Culture and Art, 2020, 13(4): 1-7.] | |
[6] | 赵华. 文旅融合下乡村公共文化服务创新体系研究[J]. 经济问题, 2021(5): 111-116. |
[Zhao Hua. Research on the innovative system of rural public cultural service in the integration of culture and tourism[J]. Economic Forum, 2021(5): 111-116.] | |
[7] | 潘颖, 孙红蕾, 郑建明. 文旅融合视域下乡村公共文化服务差异化模式及实现路径[J]. 图书馆建设, 2021(5): 125-132. |
[Pan Ying, Sun Honglei, Zheng Jianming. Rural public cultural service from the perspective of integration of culture and tourism: Differentiation mode and realization paths[J]. Library Development, 2021(5): 125-132.] | |
[8] | Arnaiz-Schmitz C, Herrero-Jáuregui C, Schmitz M F. Recreational and nature-based tourism as a cultural ecosystem service: Assessment and mapping in a rural-urban gradient of central Spain[J]. Land, 2021, 10(4): 343, doi: 10.3390/land10040343. |
[9] | Nahuelhual L, Carmona A, Lozada P, et al. Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: An application at the local level in Southern Chile[J]. Applied Geography, 2013, 40: 71-82. |
[10] | Schuhbauer S L, Hausmann A. Cooperation for the implementation of digital applications in rural cultural tourism marketing[J]. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 2022, 16(1): 106-120. |
[11] | Barkauskas V, Barkauskien? K, Jasinskas E. Analysis of macro environmental factors influencing the development of rural tourism: Lithuanian case[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 213: 167-172. |
[12] | ??astná M, Vaishar A, Brychta J, et al. Cultural tourism as a driver of rural development: Case study: Southern Moravia[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(21): 9064, doi: 10.3390/SU12219064. |
[13] | Marzo-Navarro M, Pedraja-Iglesias M, Vinzón L. Key variables for developing integrated rural tourism[J]. Tourism Geographies, 2017, 19(4): 575-594. |
[14] | 唐承财, 刘亚茹, 万紫微, 等. 传统村落文旅融合发展水平评价及影响路径[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78(4): 980-996. |
[Tang Chengcai, Liu Yaru, Wan Ziwei, et al. Evaluation system and influencing paths of the integration of culture and tourism of traditional villages[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(4): 980-996.] | |
[15] | 张新成, 高楠, 王琳艳. 我国乡村旅游公共服务多元系统协同水平时空演化及其作用机制分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(1): 298-309. |
[Zhang Xincheng, Gao Nan, Wang Linyan. Spatiotemporal evolution and function of the coordination level of the multisystem of rural tourism public service in China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(1): 298-309.] | |
[16] | 孙传龙, 张卓栋, 邱倩倩, 等. 基于层次分析法的锡林郭勒草地景观系统风蚀危险性分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(5): 1036-1042. |
[Sun Chuanlong, Zhang Zhuodong, Qiu Qianqian, et al. AHP based wind erosion risk analysis of the Xilinguole grassland landscape system[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2016, 39(5): 1036-1042.] | |
[17] | 张希月, 虞虎, 陈田, 等. 非物质文化遗产资源旅游开发价值评价体系与应用——以苏州市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(8): 997-1007. |
[Zhang Xiyue, Yu Hu, Chen Tian, et al. Evaluation of tourism development value of intangible culture heritage resources: A case study of Suzhou City[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(8): 997-1007.] | |
[18] | 张新成, 高楠, 王琳艳, 等. 红色旅游高质量发展评价指标体系与培育路径研究——以红色旅游城市为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(6): 1927-1937. |
[Zhang Xincheng, Gao Nan, Wang Linyan, et al. Evaluation index system and cultivation path of high-quality development of red tourism: A case of red tourism cities[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(6):1927-1937.] |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |