生物与土壤

石羊河流域荒漠区植被类型、分布和数量特征

  • 郭方君 ,
  • 马全林 ,
  • 张锦春 ,
  • 李得禄 ,
  • 袁宏波 ,
  • 陈芳 ,
  • 魏林源 ,
  • 张德魁
展开
  • 1.甘肃农业大学林学院,甘肃 兰州 730070
    2.甘肃省治沙研究所荒漠化与风沙灾害防治国家重点实验室培育基地,甘肃 兰州 730070
    3.甘肃省林业科学研究院,甘肃 兰州 730020
郭方君(1998-),男,在读硕士,主要从事荒漠植物研究. E-mail: guofangjun9803@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-02-13

  修回日期: 2023-05-16

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-05

基金资助

甘肃省重点人才项目(2022RCXM039);甘肃省草原生态修复治理科技支撑项目(LCJ20210028);国家自然科学基金项目(32160410);国家科技基础资源调查专项(2017FY100203)

Vegetation types, distribution and quantitative characteristics in the desert area of Shiyang River Basin

  • Fangjun GUO ,
  • Quanlin MA ,
  • Jinchun ZHANG ,
  • Delu LI ,
  • Hongbo YUAN ,
  • Fang CHEN ,
  • Linyuan WEI ,
  • Dekui ZHANG
Expand
  • 1. College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    2. Gansu Desert Control Research Institute State Ley Laboratory of Desertification and Aeolian Sand Disaster Combating, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    3. Gansu Forestry Scientific Research Institute, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China

Received date: 2022-02-13

  Revised date: 2023-05-16

  Online published: 2023-12-05

摘要

石羊河流域荒漠区植被在遏制巴丹吉林沙漠和腾格里沙漠的合拢及保障区域绿洲生态安全方面发挥着极其重要的作用。为全面掌握石羊河流域荒漠区植被类型、分布及其生存现状,在解译卫片影像基础上,开展了多年实地调查,划分了荒漠植被类型,绘制了植被分布图,分析了典型荒漠植被群落的数量特征,为石羊河流域荒漠植被及其物种多样性保护利用提供依据。结果表明:(1) 石羊河流域荒漠区植被类型较多,有4个植被型组、6个植被型、7个植被亚型、40个植被群系,具有典型的荒漠和草原化荒漠特征。荒漠区植被在流域内的空间分布差异明显,东部流沙分布较广,植被类型较为单一;北部戈壁与沙漠交错分布,植被类型及物种组成相对丰富。(2) 石羊河流域荒漠区植被物种组成较为丰富,有57科255属486种,以温带荒漠植物为主,多年生草本、一年生草本和灌木分别占总物种数的49.59%、25.31%和18.93%,乔木、寄生草本和水生植物数量较少。石羊河流域荒漠区植被层片结构简单,群落建群种常为灌木和半灌木。(3) 石羊河流域典型植物群落优势种的数量特征差异明显,从物种丰富度来看,石羊河流域荒漠区典型植物群落的物种丰富度介于2.1~16.3之间,平均物种数7.6种,以红砂+泡泡刺(Reaumuria songarica+Nitraria sphaerocarpa)群落物种最为丰富,为16.3种;珍珠柴+泡泡刺+尖叶盐爪爪(Caroxylon passerinum+Nitraria sphaerocarpa+Kalidium cuspidatum)群落次之,为14.5种;而白刺(Nitraria tangutorum)群落、合头藜(Sympegma regelii)群落、盐爪爪(Kalidium foliatum)群落和黑沙蒿(Artemisia ordosica)群落物种数最少分别为2.7种、2.6种、2.1种、2.6种。综上所述,石羊河流域荒漠植被区类型多样,组成物种相对丰富,但群落盖度、物种丰富度和多样性指数较低,因此要加强荒漠植被及其脆弱生境的保护和修复,以维持荒漠生态系统的多样性、稳定性、持续性,充分发挥生态防护功能。

本文引用格式

郭方君 , 马全林 , 张锦春 , 李得禄 , 袁宏波 , 陈芳 , 魏林源 , 张德魁 . 石羊河流域荒漠区植被类型、分布和数量特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023 , 46(11) : 1848 -1857 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.055

Abstract

Desert vegetation within the Shiyang River Basin of China plays an important role in mitigating the convergence of the Badain Jaran and Tengger Deserts. It plays a vital role in maintaining the ecological security of the regional oasis. A comprehensive understanding of the types, distribution, and survival of desert vegetation in the Shiyang River Basin was pursued through a multiyear field survey aided by satellite images. This endeavor classified desert vegetation types, draw vegetation distribution maps, and analyze the quantitative characteristics of typical desert vegetation communities. These findings serve as a basis for the conservation and sustainable use of desert vegetation and its species diversity in the Shiyang River Basin. The study yielded the following key insights: (1) The Shiyang River Basin boasts diverse desert vegetation types, organized into 4 vegetation type groups, 6 vegetation types, 7 vegetation subtypes, and 40 vegetation groups. These exhibit typical desert and steppe desert characteristics. The spatial distribution of desert vegetation within the basin considerably varies. The eastern part predominantly features drifting sands and a homogeneous vegetation type, while the northern part is characterized by a rich distribution of Gobi areas interspersed with different vegetation types and species composition. (2) The species composition of desert vegetation in the Shiyang River Basin is considerably rich, encompassing 486 species in 255 genera of 57 families, mainly consisting of temperate desert plants, perennial herbs, annual herbs, and shrubs, accounting for 49.59%, 25.31%, and 18.93% of the total number of species, respectively. The desert vegetation structure in the Shiyang River Basin is simple, with shrubs and semi-shrubs often serving as community-building species. (3) The number of dominant species within typical plant communities in the Shiyang River Basin varies considerably. These communities exhibit species richness ranging from 2.1 to 16.3, with an average of 7.6 species. The Reaumuria songarica+Nitraria sphaerocarpa community is the richest, with 16.3 species. Following closely is the Caroxylon passerinum+Nitraria sphaerocarpa+Kalidium cuspidatum community, which encompasses 14.5 species. Conversely, the Nitraria tangutorum, Sympegma regelii, Kalidium foliatum, and Artemisia ordosica communities had the lowest number of species, with 2.7, 2.6, 2.1, and 2.6 species, respectively. In summary, the Shiyang River Basin harbors diverse desert vegetation types and a rich variety of constituent species. However, community cover, species richness, and diversity index are low. Therefore, the protection and restoration of desert vegetation and its fragile habitats should be strengthened to maintain the diversity, stability, and sustainability of the desert ecosystem while harnessing its full ecological protection potential.

参考文献

[1] 张华, 张玉红, 张改改. 民勤绿洲青土湖植被优势种地上生物量估算[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(1): 201-210.
[1] [ Zhang Hua, Zhang Yuhong, Zhang Gaigai. Aboveground biomass estimation of the dominant species of vegetation in the Qingtu Lake at Minqin Qasis[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(1): 201-210. ]
[2] 李小玉, 肖笃宁. 石羊河流域中下游绿洲土地利用变化与水资源动态研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2005, 16(5): 643-648.
[2] [ Li Xiaoyu, Xiao Duning. Dynamics of water resources and land use in oases in middle and lower reaches of Shiyang River watershed, northwest China[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2005, 16(5): 643-648. ]
[3] 常兆丰, 韩福贵, 仲生年, 等. 石羊河下游沙漠化的自然因素和人为因素及其位移[J]. 干旱区地理, 2005, 28(2): 150-155.
[3] [ Chang Zhaofeng, Han Fugui, Zhong Shengnian, et al. Natural and artificial factors and their transfer on sandy desertification of lower reaches of Shiyang River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2005, 28(2): 150-155. ]
[4] 刘虎俊, 王继和, 常兆丰, 等. 石羊河下游荒漠植物区系及其植被特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(2): 113-118.
[4] [ Liu Hujun, Wang Jihe, Chang Zhaofeng, et al. Characteristics of desert flora and vegetation in lower reach of Shiyang River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2006, 25(2): 113-118. ]
[5] 王琪, 史基安, 张中宁, 等. 石羊河流域环境现状及其演化趋势分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2003, 23(1): 46-54.
[5] [ Wang Qi, Shi Ji’an, Zhang Zhongning, et al. Current situation of the environment in Shiyang River Basin and its evolutionary trends[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2003, 23(1): 46-54. ]
[6] 吴征镒. 中国植被[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1980: 145-187.
[6] [ Wu Zhengyi. Vegetation of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1980: 145-187. ]
[7] 张新时. 中国植被及其地理格局: 中华人民共和国植被图集1:100万说明书[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2007.
[7] [ Zhang Xinshi. Vegetation and its geographic pattern in China: A 1: 1 million manual for the vegetation atlas of the People’s Republic of China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2007. ]
[8] 郭柯, 方精云, 王国宏, 等. 中国植被分类系统修订方案[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(2): 111-127.
[8] [ Guo Ke, Fang Jingyun, Wang Guohong, et al. A revised scheme of vegetation classification system of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 44(2): 111-127. ]
[9] 方精云, 郭柯, 王国宏, 等. 《中国植被志》的植被分类系统、植被类型划分及编排体系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(2): 96-110.
[9] [ Fang Jingyun, Guo Ke, Wang Guohong, et al. Vegetation classification system and classification of vegetation types used for the compilation “vegetation of China”[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 44(2): 96-110. ]
[10] 黄大燊. 甘肃植被[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 1997.
[10] [ Huang Dashen. Vegetation of Gansu[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu Science and Technology Press, 1997. ]
[11] 中国科学院内蒙古宁夏综合考察队. 内蒙古植被[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985.
[11] [ Integrated Expedition to Inner Mongolia and Ningxia,Chinese Academy of Sciences. Vegetation of Inner Mongolia[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1985. ]
[12] 同文轩. 甘肃草场植被与草地生态系统[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 2010.
[12] [ Tong Wenxuan. Grassland vegetation and grassland ecosystems in Gansu[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu Science and Technology Press, 2010. ]
[13] 李得禄, 马全林, 张锦春, 等. 腾格里沙漠植被特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(4): 223-233.
[13] [ Li Delu, Ma Quanlin, Zhang Jinchun, et al. Vegetation characteristics of the Tengger Desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(4): 223-233. ]
[14] 汪殿蓓, 暨淑仪, 陈飞鹏. 植物群落物种多样性研究综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2001, 20(4): 55-60.
[14] [ Wang Dianbei, Ji Shuyi, Chen Feipeng. A review on the species diversity of plant community[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2001, 20(4): 55-60. ]
[15] 马全林, 袁宏波, 张锦春, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠植被[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 2018: 32-36.
[15] [ Ma Quanlin, Yuan Hongbo, Zhang Jinchun, et al. Vegetation in the Ulan Buh Desert[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu Science and Technology Press, 2018: 32-36. ]
[16] 李得禄, 刘世增, 纪永福, 等. 民勤连古城自然保护区异质生境中沙木蓼群落结构及物种多样性[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(5): 85-89, 181.
[16] [ Li Delu, Liu Shizeng, Ji Yongfu, et al. Community structure and species diversity of Atraphaxis bracteata in Minqin Liangucheng Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2016, 31(5): 85-89, 181. ]
[17] 王蒙, 董治宝, 罗万银, 等. 巴丹吉林沙漠南缘植被物种多样性及其与土壤特性的关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 2015, 35(2): 379-388.
[17] [ Wang Meng, Dong Zhibao, Luo Wanyin, et al. Species diversity of vegetation and its relationship with soil characteristics in the southern marginal zone of the Badain Jaran Desert[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2015, 35(2): 379-388. ]
[18] Asem S O, Roy W Y. Biodiversity and climate change in Kuwait[J]. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 2010, 2(1): 68-83.
[19] 靳虎甲, 马全林, 何明珠, 等. 石羊河下游白刺灌丛演替过程中群落结构及数量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(7): 2248-2259.
[19] [ Jin Hujia, Ma Quanlin, He Mingzhu, et al. Analysis on community structure and quantitative characteristics of Nitraria tangutorum nebkhas at different succession stage in lower reaches of Shiyang River[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(7): 2248-2259. ]
[20] 胡秀芳, 吴家祺, 鲁凤. 1995—2015年石羊河流域生物多样性维持服务时空格局研究[J]. 南通大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 17(4): 42-47.
[20] [ Hu Xiufang, Wu Jiaqi, Lu Feng. Spatiotemporal pattern study on biodiversity maintenance service of Shiyang River Basin in 1995—2015[J]. Journal of Nantong University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 17(4): 42-47. ]
[21] 高超, 赵军, 王玉纯, 等. 石羊河流域自然植被对生态系统服务的约束效应[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(9): 2851-2862.
[21] [ Gao Chao, Zhao Jun, Wang Yuchun, et al. Study on the constraint effect of natural vegetation on ecosystem services in the Shiyang River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 2851-2862. ]
[22] 赵鹏, 徐先英, 姜生秀, 等. 石羊河下游不同衰退程度多枝柽柳灌丛水分利用格局研究[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(17): 7187-7197.
[22] [ Zhao Peng, Xu Xianying, Jiang Shengxiu, et al. Water utilization pattern of Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb. Nebkhas with different decline degrees in the lower reaches of Shiyang River[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(17): 7187-7197. ]
[23] 杜佳倩, 刘彤, 王寒月, 等. 新疆荒漠一年生植物区系组成、分布及资源类型[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 185-209.
[23] [ Du Jiaqian, Liu Tong, Wang Hanyue, et al. Floristic composition, distribution, and resource types of desert annual plants in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(1): 185-209. ]
[24] 曾晓玲, 刘彤, 张卫宾, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠西部地下水位和水质变化对植被的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(5): 1490-1501.
[24] [ Zeng Xiaoling, Liu Tong, Zhang Weibin, et al. Variations in groundwater levels and quality and their effects on vegetation in the western Grurbantonggut Desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(5): 1490-1501. ]
[25] 李丽丽, 王大为, 韩涛. 2000—2015年石羊河流域植被覆盖度及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(5): 1108-1118.
[25] [ Li Lili, Wang Dawei, Han Tao. Vegetation cover in the Shiyang River Basin and its response to climate change from 2000—2015[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(5): 1108-1118. ]
[26] 戴文渊, 郭武, 郑志祥, 等. 石羊河流域水生态安全影响因子及驱动机制研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1555-1563.
[26] [ Dai Wenyuan, Guo Wu, Zheng Zhixiang, et al. Water ecological security influence factor and driving mechanism research in Shiyang River Basin[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(5): 1555-1563. ]
[27] 叶静芸, 吴波, 贾晓红, 等. 极干旱区稀疏荒漠植被地上生物量遥感估算[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(2): 478-487.
[27] [ Ye Jingyun, Wu Bo, Jia Xiaohong, et al. Estimation of aboveground biomass of sparse desert vegetation based on remote sensing techniques in hyper-arid area[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(2): 478-487. ]
[28] 魏士禹, 郭云彤, 崔亚莉, 等. 1985—2016年民勤地下水位及储变量动态特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(5): 1272-1280.
[28] [ Wei Shiyu, Guo Yuntong, Cui Yali, et al. Dynamic characteristics of groundwater level and storage variables in Minqin from 1985 to 2016[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(5): 1272-1280. ]
文章导航

/