中国研学实践基地是我国研学旅游的重要载体。综合运用地理空间分析方法系统探究其不同空间尺度下的空间分布规律及其影响因素。结果表明：（1）从全国尺度来看，研学基地整体上呈现出“东北—西南”的空间分布态势，不同类型均表现出显著的集聚特征，主要形成了以京津冀和长三角为核心的高密度区。（2）从区域尺度来看，研学基地在三大地带间呈现出“东西多、中部少”态势，在八大区域间呈现出从沿海地区到长江中下游再到西北内陆地区递减的分布规律。（3）从省域尺度来看，研学基地分布具有明显空间自相关特征，热点区呈现“L”型带状分布，冷点区呈现“V”型片状分布格局。（4）从市域尺度来看，研学基地集中分布在我国的Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型大城市，热点区集中在我国的长三角和京津冀都市圈周围。（5）区域经济发展水平、潜在客源市场、旅游产业规模和政策支持力度对研学基地空间分布具有重要影响，其中经济发展水平影响较大，且各因素影响强度呈现出一定的空间异质性。研究结果对优化我国研学基地的空间布局，助推研学旅游地的高质量发展具有参考意义。

China’s research and practice bases is a major source of research tourism in China. Comprehensive use of geospatial analysis methods to systematically explore the spatial distribution and influencing factors of China’s research and practice bases at different spatial scales show the following results: (1) On the national scale, the research and practice bases demonstrate a spatial distribution trend from “northeast to southwest”, and different types of research and practice bases demonstrate substantial agglomeration characteristics, forming a high-density area with the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and the Yangtze River Delta as the core. (2) On the regional scale, the research and practice bases demonstrate a pattern of “more in the east and west, less in the middle” among the three major zones and a decreasing distribution pattern from the coastal areas to the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, and then to the northwest inland areas among the eight regions. (3) On the provincial scale, the distribution of research and practice bases has substantial spatial autocorrelation characteristics. The hot spots are distributed in an “L-shaped” belt pattern, whereas the cold spots are distributed in a “V-shaped” piece pattern. (4) On the city scale, the research and practice bases are concentrated in type I and II metropolitan areas, and the hot spots are concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area. (5) Regional economic development level, potential tourist market, tourism industry scale, and policy support all have a considerable impact on the spatial distribution of research and practice bases, with the economic development level having the greatest impact, and the influence intensity of each factor exhibiting some spatial heterogeneity. The research results have considerable references for optimizing the spatial layout of research and practice bases in China and promoting the high-quality development of research tourism destinations.