资源型城市是基础能源和重要原材料的供应地，但由于资源衰减和缺乏统筹规划等原因，这些城市面临经济结构失衡、生态环境破坏严重等较大压力。因此，将资源型城市自然环境经济价值进行成本效益分析，对于改善资源型城市的人居环境，解决生态环境问题具有一定的指导意义。应用Meta模型，以城市居民户均支付意愿为视角，对资源型城市生态系统服务价值进行评价，并运用价值转移函数对公园价值进行评估。结果表明：（1） 以生态系统服务特征变量得到的价值较高，对资源型城市生态系统服务具有显著影响。（2） 除森林外，其他自然类型特征变量的环境资源得到的生态系统服务价值较低。（3） 城市居民收入越高支付能力越强，在支付工具的选择上，人们更倾向于利用捐款和入门费的方式进行支付。（4） 公园生态系统服务价值在1790.26×10⁴~31016.00×10⁴元，并且按照东部、中部、西部次序排列。根据研究结论，提出进一步增加资源型城市的森林面积，强化生态效益产出，提升生态系统服务功能，提高居民可支配收入，增加捐赠和入门费等自愿性支付工具使用，以此不断提高城市生态系统服务价值。

Resource-based cities are sources of basic energy and important raw materials. However, due to the decline of resources and the lack of overall planning, these cities are facing significant pressure, for instance, economic structure imbalance and significant ecological challenges. Therefore, cost-benefit analysis has significant directive meaning for improving the living environment of resource-based cities and solving their ecological problems. By reviewing the relevant literature, collecting results related to the value evaluation of resource-based cities’ ecosystem services, and then establishing a value transfer database, a Meta-analysis model is applied to evaluate the ecosystem service value of resource-based cities from the perspective of urban residents’ willingness to pay for service per household, evaluate the effectiveness of the model in value transfer outside the sample, and then explore the feasibility of the Meta-analysis method in the field of ecosystem service value evaluation of resource-based cities. The findings are as follows: (1) The value of ecosystem service characteristic variables is high, which has a significant impact on ecosystem services in resource-based cities. (2) In addition to forest resources, the value of ecosystem services obtained from environmental resources with other natural characteristic variables is low. (3) The higher the income of urban residents, the stronger their ability to pay for services. For the choice of payment method, people prefer to use donation or entrance fee. (4) The park ecosystem service value ranges from 17.9026 million yuan to 310.16 million yuan, and it is ranked from high to low in the east, middle, and west China. Based on the above research results, political suggestions are given as follows. First, increase the forest area of the resource-based cities and improve the output of ecological benefits, as well as the property rights system and ecological compensation system. As a result, the service function of the ecosystem is increased. Second, scientifically arrange the layout of urban park green space, and increase the park area of resource-based cities. Finally, increase the disposable income of urban and rural residents, provide multiple voluntary payment methods such as donations and entry fees, to enhance people’s willingness to pay and enhance the value of urban ecosystem services.