台特玛湖干涸湖盆区植物风影沙丘的形态特征

干旱区地理 ›› 2017, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1020-1028.

台特玛湖干涸湖盆区植物风影沙丘的形态特征

蔡东旭^1,2, 李生宇¹, 刘耀中³, 俞祥祥¹, 王海峰¹, 雷加强¹, 雷加强¹, 武新成⁴, 彭琴⁴, 屈磊⁴

1 中国科学院大学新疆生态与地理研究所, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830011;
2 中国科学院大学, 北京 100039;
3 国石油天然气股份有有限公司塔里木油田分公司, 新疆库尔勒 841000;
4 新疆生产建设兵团公路科学技术研究所, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830002

收稿日期:2017-04-29 修回日期:2017-07-12 出版日期:2017-09-25
通讯作者: 李生宇.Email:lishy_hb@163.com
作者简介:蔡东旭(1989-),男,甘肃天水人,硕士研究生,主要从事风沙地貌与荒漠化防治研究.Email:caidongxu8@foxmail.com
基金资助:
国家国际科技合作专项项目（2015DFR31130）；新疆生产建设兵团交通局项目（2015TKY01）

Morphological characteristics of shadow dunes of plant at dry lakebed of Taitema Lake

CAI Dong-xu^1,2, LI Sheng-yu¹, LIU Yao-zhong³, YU Xiang-xiang¹, WANG Hai-feng¹, LEI Jia-qiang¹, WU Xin-cheng¹, PENG Qin⁴, QU Lei⁴

1 Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China;
2 Universities of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100039, China

Received:2017-04-29 Revised:2017-07-12 Online:2017-09-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对台特玛湖干涸湖盆区盐穗木、柽柳和碱蓬3种植物风影沙丘的形态参数进行野外了测定，应用统计学方法，分析对比了不同植物风影沙丘的形态特征及阻沙能力。结果表明：（1）风影沙丘处于由沙嘴向沙堆演化阶段，沙丘形态参数间相关性显著（P<0.01），其中沙丘高度与水平尺度相关性较好，沙丘垂向发育速度快于水平扩展。（2）风影沙丘与植物形态参数间亦存在相关性，受植物生物特性的影响，不同植物的相关性差异较大，其中碱蓬呈高度正相关（R>0.85，沙丘背风坡坡度除外），盐穗木次之，柽柳灌丛相关性微弱。（3）在相同的区域环境下，3种植物的单株阻沙能力呈柽柳 > 盐穗木 > 碱蓬，盐穗木、碱蓬积沙量受株高影响较大，两者呈二次函数关系；柽柳积沙量主要取决于灌丛迎风剖面的面积。

关键词: 形态特征, 风影沙丘, 阻沙能力, 干涸湖盆

Abstract: Nebkhas was widely distributed in the arid region of northwest China. More researches on the sand-pile and sandbags stage of nebkhas have been done in recent years, but few have been conducted on the shadow dune originated from the plants. Therefore, in this study, the morphological parameters of shadow dunes of three plant species,Halostachys caspica,Tamarix ramosissima and Suaeda glauca,were studied at dry lakebed of Taitema Lake. The morphological characteristics of shadow dunes and sand trapping capability of three plant species were compared and analyzed by the approaches of least significant difference, correlation analysis and regression analysis. The results indicate that the length, width and height of three kinds of shadow dunes presented a significant correlation(P<0.01)with the correlation coefficients ranging from 0.392 to 0.995. There was a better correlation between the height and horizontal scale of shadow dunes(R>0.6). The vertical development of the dunes was faster than the horizontal expansion. The morphological parameters of shadow dunes were correlated with the morphological parameters of their plants. But the correlation between different plants and their shadow dunes were different. This difference was mainly influenced by the biological nature of the plant. In the same area, the sand trapping capability of individuals of three plants was shown as Tamarix ramosissima > Halostachys caspica > Suaeda glauca, the amount of sand trapped by on average unit crown volume of the plant was Suaeda glauca > Halostachys caspica > Tamarix ramosissima. The amount of deposited sand trapped by Halostachys caspica and Suaeda glauca kept a quadratic relationship with plant height. The sand trapped by Tamarix ramosissima dune was mainly influenced by the windward area of the shrub. The result of this paper was of great significance for understanding the interaction between plants and sand-blown activities, and evaluating the sand trapping capability of plants.

Key words: morphological character, shadow dunes, sand trapping capability, dry lakebed

中图分类号:

P931.3

蔡东旭, 李生宇, 刘耀中, 俞祥祥, 王海峰, 雷加强, 雷加强, 武新成, 彭琴, 屈磊. 台特玛湖干涸湖盆区植物风影沙丘的形态特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(5): 1020-1028.

CAI Dong-xu, LI Sheng-yu, LIU Yao-zhong, YU Xiang-xiang, WANG Hai-feng, LEI Jia-qiang, WU Xin-cheng, PENG Qin, QU Lei. Morphological characteristics of shadow dunes of plant at dry lakebed of Taitema Lake[J]. , 2017, 40(5): 1020-1028.

参考文献

[1] HESP P A.The formation of shadow dunes[J]. Sedimentary Petrology, 1981, 51:101-112.

[2] TENGBERG A. Nebkha dunes as indicators of wind erosion and land degradation in the Sahel zone of Burkina Faso[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1995, 30(3):265-282.

[3] 岳兴玲, 哈斯, 庄燕美, 等. 沙质草原灌丛沙堆研究综述[J].中国沙漠, 2005, 25(5):738-743[. YUE Xingling, Hasi, ZHUANG Yanmei, et al. Studies on sandy grassland nebkhas:a review[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2005, 25(5):738-743.]

[4] 王雪芹, 胡永锋, 杨东亮, 等. 绿洲-沙漠过渡带骆驼刺群落的防风阻沙作用[J]. 干旱区地理, 2011, 34(6):919-925[. WANG Xueqin, HU Yongfeng, YANG Dongliang, et al. Effect of Alhagi sparsifolia community on wind block and drift sand control in the oasis-desert ecotone[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2011, 34(6):919-925.]

[5] WOLFES A, NICKLING W G.The protective role of sparse vegetation in wind erosion[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 1993, 17(1):50-68.

[6] XIAO J H, QU J J, YAO Z Y, et al. Morphology and formation mechanism of sand shadow dunes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7(1):10-26.

[7] WANG X M, WANG T, DONG Z B, et al. Nebkha development and its significance to wind erosion and land degradation in semi-arid northern China[J].Journal of Arid Environments, 2006, 65(1):129-141.

[8] 曾凡江, 张希明, 李小明. 骆驼刺植被及其资源保护与开发的意义[J]. 干旱区地理, 2002, 25(3):286-288[. ZENG Fanjiang, ZHANG Ximing, LI Xiaoming. Study on the characteristics of Alhagi and its impact on resource protection and development[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2002, 25(3):286-288.]

[9] 唐艳, 刘连友, 哈斯, 等. 毛乌素沙地南缘3灌草丛形态与阻沙能力的对比研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2008, 15(2):44-48.[TANG Yan, LIU Lianyou, HASI Eerdun, et al. Comparison on morphology and sand trapping capability of three shrubs in south edge of Mu Us Sandland[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 15(2):44-48.]

[10] 穆桂金. 塔克拉玛干沙漠灌草丘的发育特征及环境意义[J]. 干旱区研究, 1994, 11(1):34-40.[MU Guijin. The Environmental significance of vegetation cones of the Taklimakan Desert, China[J]. Arid Zone Research, 1994, 11(1):34-40.]

[11] 王翠, 雷加强, 李生宇, 等. 新疆策勒绿洲沙漠过渡带花花柴(Karelinia caspica)沙堆的形态特征[J].中国沙漠, 2013, 33(4):981-989.[WANG Cui, LEI Jiaqiang, LI Shengyu, et al. Morphological characteristics of Karelinia caspica nebkhas in the oasis-desert ecotone in Cele, Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2013, 33(4):981-989.]

[12] 刘金伟, 李志忠, 武胜利. 新疆艾比湖周边白刺沙堆形态特征空间异质性研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(4):628-635[. LIU Jinwei, LI Zhizhong, WU Shengli, et al. The spatial heterogeneity of morphologic feature of Nitraria nebkhas around Ebinur Lake, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2009, 29(4):628-635.]

[13] 武胜利, 李志忠, 惠军, 等. 灌丛沙堆表面压力分布特征的实验研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2006, 29(6):790-796[. WU Shengli, LI Zhizhong, HUI Jun, et al. Study on the distribution character of surface pressure of nabkha in wind-tunnel imitative experiment[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2006, 29(6):790-796.]

[14] 杨帆, 郑新倩, 王雪芹, 等. 绿洲-沙漠过渡带柽柳灌丛沙堆表面的蚀、积特征[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2013, 7(5):55-61.[YANG Fan, ZHENG Xinqian, WANG Xueqin, et al. The surface erosion-deposition characteristic of Tamarix ramosissima nebkhas in Cele oasis-desert ecotone[J]. Desert and Oasis Meteorology, 2013, 7(5):55-61.]

[15] 朱军涛, 李向义, 张希明, 等. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘3种荒漠植物光合特性的比较[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(1):171-176.[ZHU Juntao, LI Xiangyi, ZHANG Ximing, et al. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics of three species growing at the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2012, 35(1):171-176.]

[16] ROLES B, DONDERS, WERGER M J A, et al. Relation of wind-induced sand displacement to plant biomass and plant sand-binding capacity[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2001, 43(9):979-982.

[17] 武胜利, 李志忠, 肖晨曦, 等. 灌丛沙堆研究进展与意义[J]. 中国沙漠, 2006, 26(5):734-738.[WU Shengli, LI Zhizhong, XIAO Chengxi, et al. Research progress on nabkhas and research significance[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2006, 26(5):734-738.]

[18] 唐艳, 刘连友, 屈志强, 等. 植物阻沙能力研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2011, 31(1):43-48[. TANG Yan, LIU Lianyou, QU Zhiqiang, et al. Research review of capacity of plant for trapping blown sand[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2011, 31(1):43-48.]

[19] HESP P. Foredune sand blowouts:initiation,geomorphology and dynamics[J]. Geomorphology, 2002, 48:245-268.

[20] 朱震达, 陈广庭. 中国土地沙质荒漠化[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1994:20-27[. ZHU Zhenda, CHEN Guangting. Sandy desertification in China[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1994:20-27.]

[21] 张萍, 哈斯, 岳兴玲, 等. 白刺灌丛沙堆形态与沉积特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2008, 31(6):926-932[. ZHANG Ping, HASI Eerdun, YUE Xingling, et al. Nitaria nebkhas:morphology and sediments[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2008, 31(6):926-932.]

[22] 张锦春, 刘长仲, 姚拓, 等. 库姆塔格柽柳沙包年层粒度特征及其沉积环境探讨[J]. 干旱区地理, 2014, 37(6):1155-1162.[ZHANG Jinchun, LIU Changzhong, YAO Tou, et al. Exploration to sedimentary environment and grain-size characteristics in age layers of Tamarix sand-hillocks in Kumtag Desert[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2014, 37(6):1155-1162.]

[23] TENGBERG A, CHEN D L. A comparative analysis of nebkhas in central Tunisia and northern Burkina Faso[J]. Geomorphology, 1998, 22(2):182-192.

[24] KHALAFF I,MISAK R,ALDOUSARI A. Sedimentological and morphological characteristics of some nabkha deposits in the northern coastal plain of Kuwait, Arabia[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1995, 29(3):267-292.

[25] ELBANA M I, NIJSI, KOCKELBERGH F. Microenvironmental and vegetational heterogeneity induced by phytogenic nebkhas in an arid coastal ecosystem[J]. Plant and Soil, 2002, 247(2):283-293.

[26] MAUN M A. Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dune[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1998, 76:713-738.

[27] 杜建会, 严平, 董玉祥, 等. 干旱地区灌丛沙堆研究现状与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(3):339-350[. DU Jianhui, YAN Ping, DONG Yuxiang, et al. The progress and prospects of nebkhas in arid areas[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(3):339-350.]

[28] 孙丽坤, 刘万秋, 陈拓, 等. 柽柳属(Tamarix)植物生境适应机制与资源价值研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(2):349-356.[SUN Likun, LIU Wanqiu, CHEN Tuo, et al. Review on mechanism of habitat adaptability and resource value of Tamarix species[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2016, 36(2):349-356.]

[29] 郑婷婷, 李生宇, 靳正忠, 等. 4种固沙植物在塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地的水势特征[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011, 26(3):21-25.[ZHENG Tingting, LI Shengyu, JIN Zhengzhong, et al. Characteristics of water potential of four kinds of plants in the Taklimakan Desert[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2011, 26(3):21-25.]