辽西北风沙地不同林草措施土壤水文效应研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取辽西北沙地典型农牧交错地带为研究区域，以荒草地作为对照，研究樟子松林地、杨树林地、灌木林地、人工草地4种植被恢复措施下0~100 cm土层内土壤容重、孔隙度、蓄水能力和土壤饱和导水率（K_fs）等土壤水分物理性质的变化特征。结果表明：杨树林地表层土壤容重最小，其次是灌木林地、樟子松林地、人工草地，荒草地最大；随土层的递增，土壤容重均表现出增大的趋势。各样地土壤毛管孔隙度随着土壤深度的增加均呈现出明显的下降趋势，与土壤容重呈显著负相关关系（p=-0.583^*，n=5）。不同植被恢复措施土壤蓄水容量具有一定差异，其范围在3 761.59~4 366.94 t·hm^-2之间，其中蓄水容量最高的是杨树林地，达到了4 366.94 t·hm^-2，蓄水容量最低的是荒草地，为3 761.59 t·hm^-2。不同植被恢复措施有效蓄容位于1 315.50~2 047.62 t·hm^-2之间，其中以杨树林地最大，樟子松林地最小。5种沙地类型K_fs排序为灌木林地（2.49 mm·min^-1）>人工草地（1.81 mm·min^-1）>荒草地（1.73 mm·min^-1）>樟子松林地（1.61 mm·min^-1）>杨树林地（1.44 mm·min^-1），人工草地和荒草地的K_fs随土层增加先减小后增大，樟子松林地、杨树林地和灌木林地先增大后减小。该地区林木恢复措施效果优于草地，应着重发展林木恢复措施。

关键词: 辽西北, 风沙地, 水文效应, 植被恢复

Abstract: This paper took the agriculture and pasturage interlaced zone of the typical sandy land in northwestern Liaoning as the study area.With the wild grass ground being the reference,the change characteristics of the physical properties of the soil moisture within 0-100 cm soil layer, such as soil bulk density,porosity,water holding capacity and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity,were investigated for different types of land cover including the Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica land,poplar forest land,shrub land and artificial grassland.The results showed that the surface soil bulk density of the poplar forest land was the minimum,followed by shrub land, Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica,artificial grassland and wild grassland.The soil bulk density showed an increasing trend with the increase of soil layer depth.The soil capillary porosity showed a significant downward trend with the increase of soil depth and had a significant negative correlation with the soil bulk density ( p=-0.583^*, n=5).The soil water holding capacity under different vegetation restoration measures were different with a range of variation from 3 761.59 to 4 366.94 t·hm^-2,and the poplar forest land held the highest of 4 366.94 t·hm^-2 and the artificial grassland,the lowest of 4 055.34 t·hm^-2.The effective capacity of different vegetation restoration measures ranged from 1 315.50 to 2 047.62 t·hm^-2,among which the maximal is the poplar forest land and the minimum,the Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica.The ranking of the five types of sandy land on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity was as follows:shrub land(2.49 mm·min^-1)>artificial grassland(1.81 mm·min^-1)>wild grassland (1.73 mm·min^-1)> Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica land(1.61 mm·min^-1)>poplar forest land(1.44 mm·min^-1).With the increase of soil depth,the soil saturated hydraulic conductivity of artificial grassland and wild grassland was decreased first and then increased,while for the Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica,poplar forest land and shrub land,it was increased first and then decreased.The effect of forest restoration measures in Horqin Sandy Land is better than that of grassland and therefore the forest restoration measures should take the priority.

Key words: northwestern Liaoning Province, wind sandy land, hydrological effects, vegetation restoration measures

中图分类号:

P152.7⁺5

吕刚, 王韫策, 李叶鑫, 王婷, 翟景轩, 王磊. 辽西北风沙地不同林草措施土壤水文效应研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(2): 342-348.

LV Gang, WANG Yun-ce, LI Ye-xin, WANG Ting, ZHAI Jing-xuan, WANG Lei. Hydrological effects of different forest and grass measures on the soil in wind sandy land of Northwestern Liaoning Province[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(2): 342-348.

参考文献

[1] 赵世伟,周印东,吴金水.子午岭北部不同植被类型土壤水分特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(4):119-122.[ZHAO Shiwei,ZHOU Yindong,WU Jinshui.Soil moisture characteristics of different vegetations in northern of Ziwuling[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,16(4):119-122.]
[2] 张光灿,夏江宝,王贵霞,等.鲁中花岗山区人工林土壤水分物理性质[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):44-48.[ZHANG Guangcan,XIA Jiangbao,WANG Guixia,et al.Study on soil moisture physical characteristics of artificial forest in granite mountainous region[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,19(6):44-48.]
[3] 李德生,张萍,张水龙,等.黄前库区经济林土壤水文效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(1):141-143.[LI Desheng,ZHANG Ping,ZHANG Shuilong,et al.Study on soil hydraulic effect of economic forest in Huangqian Reservoir Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(1):141-143.]
[4] 冯起,程国栋.我国沙地水分分布状况及其意义[J].土壤学报,1999,6(2):225-236.[FENG Qi,CHENG Guodong.Moisture distribution and movement in sandy lands of China[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,1999,6(2):225-236.]
[5] 何修道.科尔沁沙地樟子松人工林土壤水分动态变化研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016.[HE Daoxiu.Study of soil water dynamics of Pinus syluestris var.mongolicaplantation in Horgin Sandy Land[D].Lanzhou:Gansu Agricultural University,2016.]
[6] 李裕元,邵明安,陈洪松,等.水蚀风蚀交错带植被恢复对土壤物理性质的影响生[J].生态学报,2010,30(16):4306-4316.[LI Yuyuan,SHAO Ming'an,CHEN Hongsong,et al.Impacts of vegetation recovery on soil physical properties in the cross area of wind-water erosion[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(16):4306-4316.]
[7] 黄晓强,赵云杰,信忠保,等.北京山区典型土地利用方式对土壤理化性质及可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):5-10.[HUANG Xiaoqiang,ZHAO Yunjie,XIN Zhongbao,et al.Influence of typical land use types on soil physico-chemical properties and erodibility in Beijing Mountainous[J].Research of soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(1):5-10.]
[8] 刘世梁,傅伯杰,吕一河,等.坡面土地利用方式与景观位置对土壤质量的影响[J].生态学报,2003,23(3):414-420.[LIU ShiLiang,FU BoJie,LU Yihe,et al.Assessment of soil quality in relation to land use and landscape position on slope[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2003,23(3):414-420.]
[9] 刘春利,邵明安.黄土高原六道沟流域不同土地利用方式下土壤水力特性及其对土壤水分的影响[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(11):2400-2407.[LIU Chunli,SHAO Ming'an.Soil hydraulic properties and their influences on soil water content under different land uses in Liudaogou Watershed of Loess Plateau[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2008,19(11):2400-2407.]
[10] 朱雅娟,贾志清,刘丽颖,等.民勤绿洲外围不同林龄人工梭梭林的土壤水分特征[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(2):442-446.[ZHU Yajuan,JIA Zhiqing,LIU Liying,et al.Soil water in planted Haloxylon ammodendron shrubland of different age outside Minqin Oasis[J].Journal of Desert Research,2011,31(2):442-446.]
[11] 蒋德明,曹成有,李雪华,等.科尔沁沙地植被恢复及其对土壤的改良效应[J].生态环境学报,2008,17(3):1135-1139.[JIANG Deming,CAO Chengyou,LI Xuehua,et al.Vegetation restoration and its effects on soil improvement in Horqin Sandy Land[J].Ecology and Environment Sciences,2008,17(3):1135-1139.]
[12] 王蕾,哈斯.科尔沁沙地沙漠化研究进展[J].自然灾害学报,2004,13(4):8-14.[WANG Lei,HA Si.Advances in desertification research of Horqin Sandy Land[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2004,13(4):8-14.]
[13] 李铭,姜继元,窦中江,等.绿洲与荒漠交错带植被恢复区土壤水分变化研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(2):156-161.[LI Ming,JIANG Jiyuan,DOU Zhongjiang,et al.Soil moisture dynamic changes in the revegetated regions of the ecotone between oasis and desert[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2011,25(2):156-161.]
[14] 安云.毛乌素沙地四种典型植被恢复模式生态效益分析[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.[AN Yun.Analysis of ecoefficiency on 4 kinds of typical vegetation restoration mode in Mu Us Sandy Land[D].Beijing:Beijing Forestry University,2013.]
[15] 李海东,秦卫华,张涛,等.西藏高寒河谷流动沙地植被恢复潜力综合评价模型[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(16):220-228.[LI Haidong,QIN Weihua,ZHANG Tao,et al.Comprehensive evaluation model for revegetation potentiality on moving sandy land in alpine valley of Tibet,China[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2015,31(16):220-228.]
[16] 张玉兰,陈利军.沙漠化逆转过程中土壤性状演变综述[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(7):1440-1450.[ZHANG Yulan,CHEN Lijun.Evolvement of soil properties during reversal of desertification research progress[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2010,29(7):1440-1450.]
[17] 段民福,廖超英,孙长忠,等.毛乌素沙地樟子松人工林土壤物理性质的时空变异规律[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(3):188-192.[DUAN Minfu,LIAO Chaoying,SUN Changzhong,et al.Spatio-temporal variabilities of soil physical properties of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica artificial forest in Mu Us Desert[J].Acta Agriculturae Bereali-occidentalis Sinica,2012,21(3):188-192.]
[18] 吕刚,吴祥云,雷泽勇,等.辽西半干旱低山丘陵区人工林地表层土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(5):204-208.[LV Gang,WU Xiangyun,LEI Zeyong,et al.Hydrology effect of artificial woodland surface soil in semi-arid low mountainous upland region of western Liaoning Province[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,22(5):204-208.]
[19] 田超,杨新兵,李军,等.冀北山地不同海拔蒙古栎林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):221-226.[TIAN Chao,YANG Xinbing,LI Jun,et al.Hydrological effects of forest litters and soil of quercus mongolicain the different altitudes of north mountain of Hebei Province[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,25(4):221-226.]
[20] 梁向锋,赵世伟,张扬,等.子午岭植被恢复对土壤饱和导水率的影响[J].生态学报,2009,29(2):636-642.[LIANG Xiangfeng,ZHAO Shiwei,ZHANG Yang,et al.Effects of vegetation rehabilitation on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in Ziwuling forest area[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2009,29(2):636-642.]
[21] 郑纪勇,邵明安,张兴昌.黄土区坡面表层土壤容重和饱和导水率空间变异特征[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(3):53-56.[ZHENG Jiyong,SHAO Ming'an,ZHANG Xingchang.Spatial variation of surface soil bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity on slope in loess region[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,18(3):53-56.]
[22] 李保国,胡克林.农田土壤表层饱和导水率的条件模拟[J].水利学报,2002,33(2):36-40.[LI Baoguo,HU Kelin.Conditional simulation of soil surface saturated hydraulic conductivity at field scale[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineeing,2002,33(2):36-40.]
[23] 胡克林,李保国,陈研.表层土壤饱和导水率的空间变异对农田水分渗漏的影响[J].水利学报,2006,37(10):1217-1223.[HU Kelin,LI Baoguo,CHEN Yan.Effect of spatial variability of surface soil saturated hydraulic conductivity on water drainage at field scale[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineeing,2006,37(10):1217-1223.]
[24] 赵建生,王永明,杨新兵.冀北山地森林土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):201-205.[ZHAO Jiansheng,WANG Yongming,YANG Xinbing.Hydrological effects of forest soil in mountain area of northern Hebei[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(3):201-205.]
[25] 赵学勇,左小安,赵哈林,等.科尔沁不同类型沙地土壤水分在降水后的空间变异特征[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(2):275-281.[ZHAO Xueyong,ZUO Xiaoan,ZHAO Halin,et al.Spatial variability of soil moisture after rainfall in different type sands of Horqin Sand[J].Arid Land Geography,2006,29(2):275-281.]
[26] WANG TJ,ZLOTNIK V A,WEDIN D,et al.Spatial trends in saturated hydraulic conductivity of vegetated dunes in the nebraska sand hills:Effects of depth and topography[J].Journal of Hydrology,2008,49(1/2):88-97.
[27] 姚淑霞,赵传成,张铜会.科尔沁不同沙地土壤饱和导水率比较研究[J].土壤学报,2013,50(3):469-477.[YAO Shuxia,ZHAO Chuancheng,ZHANG Tonghui.A comparison of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity(K_fs) in different Horqin Sand Land[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2013,50(3):469-477.]