贸易便利化、对外直接投资的出口效应分析

干旱区地理 ›› 2017, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1111-1117.

贸易便利化、对外直接投资的出口效应分析

丁广伟, 张磊

新疆财经大学中亚经贸研究院, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830012

收稿日期:2017-04-12 修回日期:2017-07-28 出版日期:2017-09-25
通讯作者: 张磊,(1967-),男,湖南宁乡人,中亚经贸研究院教授,经济学博士,主要研究中亚贸易.Email:leizhang.xj@163.com
作者简介:丁广伟(1991-),男,河南周口人,中亚经贸研究院博士生,主要研究国际贸易.Email:dingweimail@126.com
基金资助:
国家社科基金重大招标项目：中国新疆周边国家经济安全机制比较和整合研究（14ZDA088）

Trade facilitation's and OFDI's export effect

DING Guang-wei, ZHANG Lei

School of Central Asia Economics, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, Xinjiang, China

Received:2017-04-12 Revised:2017-07-28 Online:2017-09-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 贸易便利化、对外直接投资是影响出口的重要因素。运用主成分分析法对全球123个国家（地区）2009-2015年间的贸易便利化水平进行测算，并结合中国相应年份的对外直接投资、出口等相关数据构建随机前沿引力模型，分析贸易便利化、对外直接投资的出口效应，为进一步探析在贸易便利化不同的区域，中国对外直接投资与贸易便利化共同对中国出口的影响，依据贸易便利化水平的高低将样本分为便利化高、低的两组，分别再次进行回归分析。研究表明，贸易的便利化、对外直接投资可显著的促进中国出口，其每增长1%，可分别带动出口0.212%、0.56%的增长；东道国贸易便利化较好区域，对外直接投资、贸易便利化两者交叉项系数达0.23，而较差区域仅为0.07。

关键词: 贸易便利化, 对外直接投资, 出口效应

Abstract: Because of the weak recovery of global economy, slow development of European market and American market, the decline of major international commodity prices, the appreciation of RMB and other factors, foreign trade has gone into a serious situation and we need to explore a new mechanism of trade growth. Trade facilitation will reduce trade costs and promote bilateral trade. Direct investment towards foreign countries has an important influence on export. However, there is few people studying on whether the export of direct investment towards foreign countries is effected by trade facilitation. In order to analyze trade facilitation, the effect of direct investment towards foreign countries on export and whether the export of direct investment towards foreign countries is effected by trade facilitation, this essay constructs trade facilitation Index system, measure trade facilitation level of 123 countries(regions included)of the world from 2009 to 2015 with principal components analytic method, construct the stochastic frontier gravity model combined with GDP, population, spatial distance, direct investment towards foreign countries and export data. In order to analyze whether the export of direct investment towards foreign countries is effected by trade facilitation, this essay will split the samples into higher group and lower group according to the level of trade facilitation and analyze again separately. According to researches, first of all, trade facilitation and direct investment towards foreign countries greatly motivates Chinese export. Every 1% increase of the former will give 0.212%、0.56% increase of the latter. Second, the increase of trade facilitation level will remarkably stimulate the export of direct investment towards foreign countries. Their cross term coefficient reaches 0.23. In separately analysis, regions with high level of trade facilitation has a 0.37 high level of cross term coefficient, which is much higher than 0.06 of regions with low level of trade facilitation. Therefore, speaking of direct investment towards foreign countries, the investment towards regions with high level of trade facilitation needs to be reinforced to stimulate export.

Key words: trade facilitation, OFDI, export effect

中图分类号:

F752.62

丁广伟, 张磊. 贸易便利化、对外直接投资的出口效应分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(5): 1111-1117.

DING Guang-wei, ZHANG Lei. Trade facilitation's and OFDI's export effect[J]. , 2017, 40(5): 1111-1117.

参考文献

[1] 孔庆峰, 董虹蔚."一带一路"国家的贸易便利化水平测算与贸易潜力研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2015,(12):159-168[. KONG Qingfeng, DONG Hongwei. Trade facilitation and trade potential of countries along "One Belt One Road" route[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2015,(12):158-168.]

[2] 谢娟娟, 岳静. 贸易便利化对中国-东盟贸易影响的实证分析[J]. 世界经济研究, 2011,(8):81-86[. XIE Juanjuan, YUE Jing. Trade facilitation empirical analysis of the impact of China-asean trade[J]. Journal of Research of the World Economy, 2011,(8):81-86.]

[3] HELPMAN E. A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1984, 92(3):451-471.

[4] 刘洪铎, 曹翔, 李文宇. 双边贸易成本与对外直接投资:抑制还是促进?——基于中国的经验证据[J]. 产业经济研究, 2016, (2):96-108[. LIU Hongduo, CAO Xiang, LI Wenyu. Does bilateral trade cost promote or inhibit China's outward foreign direct investment?:evidences from China[J]. Industrial Economic Research, 2016,(2):96-108.]

[5] HORST T. The industrial composition of U.S. experts and subsidiary to the Canadian market[M]. Pittsburgh:American Economic Review, 1972:76-85.

[6] CAMARERO M, TAMARIT C. Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise[J]. American Economic Review, 2004, 91(3):693-708.

[7] 石天戈, 张小雷, 杜宏茹, 等. 中亚制造业发展的空间差异与结构特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(4) 749-756[. SHI Tiange, ZHANG Xiaolei, DU Hongru, et al. Manufacturing spatial distribution and structural characteristics in Central Asia[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2013, 36(4):749-756.]

[8] COLLIED R. Multilateral trade liberalization, foreign direct investment and the volume of world trade[J]. Economics letters, 2011, 113(1):47-49.

[9] DUVAL, UTOKTHAM. Impact of trade facilitation on foreign direct investment[R]. TID Working Paper No.04/14, 2014.

[10] 于晓华, 方创琳, 罗奎. 丝绸之路经济带陆路边境口岸城市地缘战略优势度综合评估[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(5):967-978.[YU Xiaohua, FANG Chuanglin. Comprehensive evaluation of the advantage value of geopolitical strategy of frontier port cities under the background of the Silk Road Economic Belt[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2016, 39(5):967-978]

[11] 齐胜达, 雷军, 段祖亮, 等. 中国丝绸之路经济带区域物流空间差异及其演化研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(1):207-215.[QI Shengda, LEI Jun, DUAN Zuliang, et al. Spatial difference and evolution of regional logistic in Silk-road Economic Belt in China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2016, 39(1):207-215.]

[12] 魏晓旭, 赵军. 丝绸之路经济带中国段经济发展时空演化特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2015, 38(6):1300-1309[. WEI xiaoxu, ZHAO Jun. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of economic development in Chinese section of Silk Road Economic Belt[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2015, 38(6):1300-1309.]

[13] 方创琳, 何伦志, 王岩. 丝绸之路经济带中国-哈萨克斯坦国际合作示范区建设的战略思路与重点[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(5):967-978[. FANG Chuanglin, HE Lunzhi, WANG YanStrategic thought and focus of Sino-Kazakhstan international cooperation demonstration zone in Silk Road Economic Belt[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2016, 39(5):925-934.]