新疆区域经济增长中的全要素生产率的实证分析——基于非参数Malmquist指数方法

干旱区地理 ›› 2012, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (03): 503-508.

新疆区域经济增长中的全要素生产率的实证分析——基于非参数Malmquist指数方法

宋亚君¹,²,高志刚³,韩延玲³,王垚³

1中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所，新疆乌鲁木齐 830011；2中国科学院研究生院，北京1000492；3新疆财经大学，新疆乌鲁木齐830012

收稿日期:2011-09-19 修回日期:2011-12-02 出版日期:2012-05-25
通讯作者: 宋亚君
作者简介:宋亚君(1971-)，男，河南淅川人，博士研究生，研究方向为区域与城市规划
基金资助:
国家社科基金项目《经济全球化视角下的新疆区域竞争力多维评价与对策研究》(07XJY002)

Empirical analysis of total factor productivity of Xinjiang: a nonparametric malmquist index approach

SONG Yajun¹,²,GAO Zhigang³,HAN Yanling³,WANG Yao³

1Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Urumqi 830011,Xinjiang，China;2Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100049，China; 3Xinjiang University of Finance Economy， Urumqi 830012， Xinjiang, China

Received:2011-09-19 Revised:2011-12-02 Online:2012-05-25
Contact: SONG Yajun

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 新疆作为经济发展较为落后的地区，人力资源和资金缺乏严重，因此提高全要素生产力对新疆经济发展意义更为重大。依据2005-2009年新疆地州级面板数据，采用非参数Malmquist指数方法，实证分析了新疆经济增长过程中全要素生产率的变动状况，并将其进一步分解为技术效率和技术进步。结果表明：2005-2009年新疆绝大多数地州和新疆平均全要素生产率小于1，主要受到技术进步、技术效率和规模效率的综合影响。尽管技术进步水平不断提高，但技术效率和规模效率下降产生的负面影响起到了较大的抵消作用。技术效率的下降阻碍了技术进步速度，新技术引进后利用效率不高。尤其是各地区出现规模效率下降的情况，说明技术效率不高的主要原因在于规模不经济，用大量资源投入换取经济增长，造成资源浪费。不同地州由于经济发展水平不同，对科技发展的重视不同，技术效率、技术进步和规模效率变动的状况还不完全相同，按照纯技术效率和规模效率是否大于1将新疆各地州可分为4种类型。因此在进行区域规划时，既要考虑新疆整体变化情况，还应当根据各区域的特点采取不同的策略。

关键词: 全要素生产率, 技术进步, 技术效率, Malmquist指数

Abstract: As a comparatively backward area of economic development, Xinjiang is in a serious lack of human resource and funds, so increase the total factor productivity is more important to the economic development of Xinjiang. Through a nonparametric Malmquist index approach, this paper has analyzed total factor productivity change in Xinjiang’s economics developments with panel data from 2005 to 2009, which is decomposed into technical efficiency and technical progress. The results show that the average growth rate of Xinjiang’s total factor productivity index from 2005 to 2009 is below 1, which is mainly due to the constraints of technical progress, technical efficiency and scale efficiency. Although the technical progress is growing fast, the negative effect of the decline of technical efficiency and scale efficiency could not be neglected, and this is varying with different place. The decline of technical efficiency hindered the technology progress speed, and new technology introduction in the use efficiency is not high. The emergence of the decline of scale efficiency in different regions particularly shows that the main reason of low technical efficiency is scale diseconomy, which has caused resources waste with plenty of resources for economic growth. Due to different levels of economic development, the emphasis on technological development is varying with different states. The variation of technical efficiency, technical progress and scale efficiency is not exactly the same, all states of Xinjiang could be divided into four types according to whether the pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency is above 1.Therefore, we must not only consider the entirety variation in Xinjiang, but also adopt different tactics according to the characteristics of each area in the regional planning. To increase the total factor productivity of Xinjiang, we should pay attention to enhance technical efficiency, technological progress level and scale efficiency at the same time. The growth of total factor productivity is limited if depending solely on one aspect.

Key words: total factor productivity, technical progress, technical efficiency, Malmquist index

中图分类号:

F061.5

宋亚君,高志刚,韩延玲,王垚. 新疆区域经济增长中的全要素生产率的实证分析——基于非参数Malmquist指数方法[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(03): 503-508.

SONG Yajun,GAO Zhigang,HAN Yanling,WANG Yao. Empirical analysis of total factor productivity of Xinjiang: a nonparametric malmquist index approach[J]. , 2012, 35(03): 503-508.

参考文献

胡鞍钢. 未来经济增长取决于TFP〔J〕.珠江经济, 2001,(7)：4-5. 〔HU Angang. Future economic growth depends on TFP〔J〕. Pearl River Economy. 2001,(7)：4-5.〕

王楠.中国改革开放三十年的技术进步与经济增长-基于TFP的实证研究〔J〕.经济研究导刊,2009,(31):1-2.

张林,高安刚.基于全要素生产率的我国区域内生增长的差异分析〔J〕.安徽农业科学,2011,39(34):21414-21418.

曹泽, 段宗志, 吴昌宇.中国区域TFP增长的R&D贡献测度与评价〔J〕.中国人口.资源与环境, 2011,（7）：146-152.

李斌,李书辉.湖南省各市州全要素生产率增长率的实证研究〔J〕.工业技术经济,2010,(11):50-56.

杜凤莲,董竞泽,高国鹏，等.技术效率、全要素增长率与地区间经济增长差异——以内蒙古为例〔J〕.经济理论与经济管理,2011,(5):90-97.

FARE R,GROSSKOPF S,NORRIS M,et al.Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries〔J〕.American Economic Review,1994,84:66-83.

FARE R,GROSSKOPF S,LOVELL C A K.Productivity change in Swedish pharmacies 1980-1989:a nonparametric Malmquist approach〔J〕.Journal of Productivity Analysis,1992,(3):85-101.

卢思佳, 张小雷, 雷军,等.新疆城市经济区划分及影响范围〔J〕.干旱区地理，2010, 33(2) 300-305.

翟玲红,李荣.新疆科技促进经济社会发展的分析〔J〕.决策咨询通讯,2007,(1):46-48.

张涌.产业集群与区域经济增长之间关系的研究〔D〕.大连:大连理工大学,2009.

韩春鲜, 马耀峰, 罗辉. 新疆区域经济发展空间差异与演变机制分析〔J〕. 干旱区地理, 2010,33(3)：449-455.

袁鹏, 陈圻, 胡荣. 我国区域创新绩效动态变化的Malmquist指数分析〔J〕. 科学学与科学技术管理，2007，(1):44-49.

[1]	何昭丽, 孙慧, 张振龙. 中国入境旅游发展效率及其影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(6): 1282-1289.
[2]	王兴民, 王强, 董洁芳. 新疆全要素生产率估算及其经济增长源泉分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(4): 888-896.
[3]	汪行, 范中启. 技术进步、能源结构与能源效率的动态关系研究——基于VAR模型的实证分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(3): 700-704.
[4]	徐妍. 新疆县域工业生产率时空演化特征研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(4): 895-902.
[5]	张煜, 孙慧. 基于DEA-Malmquist指数法的省域全要素生产率比较研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(2): 435-442.