收藏设为首页 广告服务联系我们在线留言

干旱区地理 ›› 1989, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 37-41.doi: 10.13826/j.cnki.cn65-1103/x.1989.02.006

• • 上一篇    下一篇

14C年龄测定中镁法和锂法的比较

骆君   

  1. 中国科学院新疆地理研究所
  • 出版日期:1989-06-25 发布日期:2025-12-25

Comparison of Magnesium Age Method with Lithium Age Method in C14 Datin

Luo Jun   

  1. Xingjiang Institute of Geography, Academia, sinica
  • Published:1989-06-25 Online:2025-12-25

Abstract: The preparation of acetylene by means of magnesium method and lithium method, the chemical fundamental of the making of benzene using the catalysts of CiOO3-AL2O3-Sio and the process are inrtoduced in the paper. The advantage and the shortcoming of the both methods are compared. The result indicates that the operaion is simple with lithium method and the preparation of the sample is convenient, the sample is not polluted easily by air, the rate of production is high, the method is safe and reliable, but the cost is high, it has a dange to be poisoned. The measure cost is low with magnesium method, but the rate of production is low, the process is long, the sample is polluted easily by air and there is a dange of exploration, so it is believed that magnesium method is advanced than lithium method in C14 dating.