收藏设为首页 广告服务联系我们在线留言

干旱区地理 ›› 2022, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1659-1670.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2021.618

• 区域发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国城市网络的核心-边缘结构演化研究——基于证券服务联系的视角

张杰(),盛科荣(),王传阳   

  1. 山东理工大学经济学院,山东 淄博 255012
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-30 修回日期:2022-02-15 出版日期:2022-09-25 发布日期:2022-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 盛科荣
  • 作者简介:张杰(1997-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事城市地理和区域经济研究. E-mail: chamjay@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(41771173)

Core-periphery dynamics of the urban network in China: A study based on securities service relationships

ZHANG Jie(),SHENG Kerong(),WANG Chuanyang   

  1. School of Economics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2021-12-30 Revised:2022-02-15 Online:2022-09-25 Published:2022-10-20
  • Contact: Kerong SHENG

摘要:

核心-边缘结构的研究将加深对城市网络演化规律的理解。基于证券服务联系视角,解析了2005—2019年中国城市网络的核心-边缘结构演化特征及其影响因素。结果表明:(1) 中国城市网络核心区块的规模稳步扩张,同时城市核心度的分布趋于分散,推动着城市网络向多中心格局发展;城市网络的核心区块主要由城市群的核心城市组成,城市网络连通度的分布收敛于Zipf法则,预示着中国城市网络将呈现持续的等级结构特征。(2) 政治权力、市场潜力、知识资本、航空联系和经济开放决定了证券企业获取有价值信息流的能力,进而构成了中国城市网络核心-边缘结构生长发育的基础;城市的网络地位在很大程度上源于“场所空间”中的影响力,这意味着城市网络的发展可能会加剧中国城市经济的发展差距。

关键词: 证券企业, 链锁网络模型, 核心-边缘结构, 信息腹地

Abstract:

Securitization has been a key aspect of China’s financial development. Since the implementation of the Reform and Opening-up policy, China’s securities industry has experienced rapid development. A large number of securities firms have grown over the past 40 years, and the distribution of the branches of these firms has expanded rapidly. In this context, securities service relationships provide important insights for the study of urban networks and are strengthening links between cities. This paper aims to analyze the core-periphery structure dynamics and as well as underlying factors of the urban network in China. First, data on headquarter and branch locations of securities firms in China is analyzed using the interlocking network model to approximate the urban network, resulting in a 293×293 valued urban network. Then, using the information hinterland theory and two types of econometric models, the pooled logit and pooled probit models, the paper identifies factors underlying variations in the network status of cities. Finally, by combining the structural dynamics and underlying factors of the urban network in China, this paper proposes a preliminary core-periphery dynamic model for further discussion of the securities service relationships in the context of the urban network. Major findings include: (1) A developing core-periphery structure in China’s urban network within securities service relationships. From 2005 to 2019, the size of the core block has expanded, and the distribution of cities’ cores tends to be decentralized, which signals the emergence of a polycentric pattern in urban network structure. The spatial pattern of the core-periphery structure corresponds to current inequalities, and overall, cities located in the four major metropolises of Beijing-Tianjin area, Yangtze Delta area, Pearl Delta area and Chengdu-Chongqing area are better positioned than those in other regions. The core block consists primarily of core cities in China’s major metropolitan areas. This is a departure from the core-periphery model in the “space of places”. Connectivity distribution in cities has shown a trend consistent with Zipf’s law, which outlined a lasting hierarchical structure in the urban network. (2) Information hinterlands are shown to decisively affect cities’ network status within securities service relationships. On the one hand, the characteristics of a given city, including political rank, market potential, knowledge base, air travel accessibility and economic openness, determine whether securities firms might profitably exploit information flows. Therefore, these characteristics are key factors underlying the core-periphery dynamics in the urban network. On the other hand, information hinterland factors are regionally heterogeneous: political rank, knowledge base, transport accessibility and economic openness have greater marginal impacts on the status of cities in the central and western regions, while market potential plays a more prominent role in China’s eastern regions. The results demonstrate that a given city’s network status is rooted in its own influence or power in the “space of places”. Network development would, therefore, not lead to a reduction of spatial economic inequality but rather, reinforce it.

Key words: securities firms, interlocking network model, core-periphery structure, information hinterland