Practice of high quality development in Xinjiang: Construction and measurement of evaluation system
Received date: 2024-02-04
Revised date: 2024-03-25
Online published: 2025-01-21
High-quality development is the cornerstone of building a modern socialist country. To advance high-quality development in Xinjiang, China, and accelerate its modernization, there is an urgent need for a scientific and rational evaluation index system to both reflect and guide progress. This study constructs a high-quality development evaluation index system for Xinjiang, incorporating primary indicators such as economic life, resource environment, innovation and opening up, regional integration and coordination, agricultural and cultural tourism industries, and eight major industrial clusters. Using the entropy method, the high-quality development index of Xinjiang is estimated. The coupling coordination degree model evaluates the degree of coordinated development of high-quality indicators in Xinjiang, while obstacle analysis identifies the factors constraining high-quality development. The findings reveal the following: (1) Xinjiang’s comprehensive high-quality development index increased from 0.172 in 2011 to 0.785 in 2022, reflecting a relatively favorable overall development level. The opening to the outside world, financial and insurance industries, economic development, and agricultural, cultural, and tourism industries have made increasingly significant contributions to high-quality development. However, challenges remain in the areas of science and technology input-output efficiency, human capital, the development gap with the national average, and low-carbon development. (2) The coupling coordination degree of Xinjiang’s high-quality development improved from 0.365 in 2011 to 0.883 in 2022, indicating strong inter-indicator correlation and a virtuous cycle. Between 2011 and 2014, the coupling and coordination degree of first-class indicators increased by 0.0715 per year, 0.0384 higher than the growth rate observed from 2015 to 2022, signaling a gradual slowdown. The degree of collaborative development between the two primary indicators, namely regional integration coordination and resource environment, is relatively low. (3) Analysis of indicators with obstacle values exceeding 0.05 over the years identifies forest coverage, natural gas production, added value of the financial industry, daily per capita domestic water consumption in cities, urban sewage treatment capacity, RMB deposits of financial institutions, registered urban unemployment rates, green coverage of built-up areas, rural electricity consumption, and reductions in chemical fertilizer use as key factors restricting Xinjiang’s high-quality development. To address these constraints, the study proposes optimizing the allocation of scientific and technological resources, enhancing the efficiency of technological investments, leveraging latecomer advantages, accelerating integration into national strategies, deepening supply-side structural reforms, and promoting industrial structural transformation.
LI Gang . Practice of high quality development in Xinjiang: Construction and measurement of evaluation system[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025 , 48(1) : 143 -152 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.079
[1] | 蔡昉. 中国经济增长如何转向全要素生产率驱动型[J]. 中国社会科学, 2013(1): 56-71, 206. |
[Cai Fang. How can Chinese economy achieve the transition toward total factor productivity growth[J]. Socil Sciences in China, 2013(1): 56-71, 206.] | |
[2] | 田秋生. 高质量发展的理论内涵和实践要求[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(6): 1-8. |
[Tian Qiusheng. Theoretical connotation and practical requirements for high-quality development[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018(6): 1-8.] | |
[3] | 任保平. 新时代中国经济从高速增长转向高质量发展: 理论阐释与实践取向[J]. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(3): 66-74, 86. |
[Ren Baoping. Theoretical interpretation and practical orientation of China’s economy from high speed growth to high quality development in new era[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(3): 66-74, 86.] | |
[4] | 赵剑波, 史丹, 邓洲. 高质量发展的内涵研究[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2019, 40(11): 15-31. |
[Zhao Jianbo, Shi Dan, Deng Zhou. A framework of China’s high-quality economic development[J]. Research on Economics and Management, 2019, 40(11): 15-31.] | |
[5] | Boldrin M, Canova F. Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: Reconsidering European regional policies[J]. Economic Policy, 2001, 16(32): 206-253. |
[6] | Globerman S, Cfa V Z. Best policy practices for promoting inward and outward foreign direct investment[R]. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada, 2010. |
[7] | 聂长飞, 简新华. 中国高质量发展的测度及省际现状的分析比较[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2020, 37(2): 26-47. |
[Nie Changfei, Jian Xinhua. Measurement of China’s high-quality development and analysis of provincial status[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2020, 37(2): 26-47.] | |
[8] | Svensson L. Factor trade and goods trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1984, 16(3-4): 365-378. |
[9] | Montfort M, Tapsoba R, Sampawende J, et al. A quality of growth index for developing countries: A proposal[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2017, 134(2): 675-710. |
[10] | 方大春, 马为彪. 中国省际高质量发展的测度及时空特征[J]. 区域经济评论, 2019(2): 61-70. |
[Fang Dachun, Ma Weibiao. Study on the measurement of China’s inter-provincial high-quality development and its spatial-temporal characteristics[J]. Regional Economic Review, 2019(2): 61-70.] | |
[11] | 李俊佳, 赵美风. 中国民族地区高质量发展空间演变及其影响机理[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(3): 496-505. |
[Li Junjia, Zhao Meifeng. Spatial evolution and influencing mechanism of high quality development in ethnic minority areas of China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(3): 496-505.] | |
[12] | 张侠, 许启发. 新时代中国省域经济高质量发展测度分析[J]. 经济问题, 2021(3): 16-25. |
[Zhang Xia, Xu Qifa. Measurement and analysis of China’s provincial economic high-quality development in the new era[J]. On Economic Problems, 2021(3): 16-25.] | |
[13] | 王伟. 中国经济高质量发展的测度与评估[J]. 华东经济管理, 2020, 34(6): 1-9. |
[Wang Wei. A study on the measurement and evaluation of the high-quality development of China’s economy[J]. East China Economic Management, 2020, 34(6): 1-9.] | |
[14] | 吕承超, 崔悦. 中国高质量发展地区差距及时空收敛性研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2020, 37(9): 62-79. |
[Lü Chengchao, Cui Yue. Research on the regional in equality and temporal-spatial convergence of high-quality development in China[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2020, 37(9): 62-79.] | |
[15] | 张震, 王泽宇, 李瑛. 中国区域经济高质量发展研究综述[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2021, 37(8): 928-933. |
[Zhang Zhen, Wang Zeyu, Li Ying. Review of researches on the high quality development of regional economy in China[J]. Resource Development Market, 2021, 37(8): 928-933.] | |
[16] | 孙豪, 桂河清, 杨冬. 中国省域经济高质量发展的测度与评价[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2020(8): 4-14, 155. |
[Sun Hao, Gui Heqing, Yang Dong. Measurement and evaluation of the high-quality of China’s provincial economic development[J]. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 2020(8): 4-14, 155.] | |
[17] | 孟晓, 田明华, 杜磊, 等. 中国农业农村现代化发展水平测度及其协调性研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(1): 137-146. |
[Meng Xiao, Tian Minghua, Du Lei, et al. Measurement and its coordination of the development level of agricultural and rural modernization in China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(1): 137-146.] | |
[18] | 刘会武, 赵祚翔, 马金秋. 区域高质量发展测度与创新驱动效应的耦合检验[J]. 技术经济, 2021, 40(9): 1-13. |
[Liu Huiwu, Zhao Zuoxiang, Ma Jinqiu. Coupling test of regional high-quality development measurement and innovation driving effect[J]. Journal of Technology Economics, 2021, 40(9): 1-13.] | |
[19] | 杨建, 方浩. 区域创新能力与高质量发展的耦合评价研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2022(6): 35-40. |
[Yang Jian, Fang Hao. Coupling evaluation research on regional innovation ability and high-quality development[J]. Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 2022(6): 35-40.] | |
[20] | 赵宏波, 马延吉. 东北粮食主产区耕地生态安全的时空格局及障碍因子——以吉林省为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2): 515-524. |
[Zhao Hongbo, Ma Yanji. Spatial-temporal pattern and obstacle factors of cultivated land ecological security in major grain producing areas of northeast China: A case study in Jilin Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(2): 515-524.] | |
[21] | 鲁邦克, 邢茂源, 杨青龙. 中国经济高质量发展水平的测度与时空差异分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(21): 113-117. |
[Lu Bangke, Xing Maoyuan, Yang Qinglong. Measurement and spatio-temporal differences analysis of high quality development level of China’s economy[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2019, 35(21): 113-117.] | |
[22] | 马茹, 罗晖, 王宏伟, 等. 中国区域经济高质量发展评价指标体系及测度研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2019(7): 60-67. |
[Ma Ru, Luo Hui, Wang Hongwei, et al. Study of evaluating high-quality economic development in Chinese regions[J]. China Soft Science, 2019(7): 60-67.] |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |