Conceptual evolution and classification system reconstruction of urban fringe
Received date: 2023-03-13
Revised date: 2023-04-27
Online published: 2023-12-05
The structure and framework of an urban fringe area considerably influence sustainable urban development as it is a dynamic region in the urbanization process. Hence, this area becomes an essential subject in the fields of geography and planning, prompting numerous studies to comprehend its dynamics. Based on relevant literature from 1991 to 2021, we explore in-depth the conceptual evolution of the urban fringe areas. We analyze the connotations of the urban fringe concept and establish a research framework for connotative analysis from three perspectives: characteristic elements, research perspectives, and derivative concepts. Utilizing this framework, we reclassify the types of urban fringe areas to establish a classification system for urban-rural, urban-urban, and urban-field fringe areas. Furthermore, based on fringe area theory, we gain a deep understanding of urban fringe concepts. Studies reveal the complexity and extensive nature of the concept of urban fringe areas. While scholars generally agree on its cognitive and essential connotations, there exist variations in its interpretations. The urban shadow area and the urban-rural interface are described from urban and suburban viewpoints, respectively, while the urban-rural linkage and urban-rural fringe encompass both urban and suburban perspectives. Urban-rural linkage denotes a stage of integration between urban and rural areas, marked by temporal and spatial distinctions. Additionally, the urban-rural fringe, a native concept, focuses more on sociological issues within the region. The periurban and urban fringe areas combine urban, rural, and suburban elements, exhibiting diverse composite characteristics. Conversely, urban fringe areas offer a more balanced analytical perspective, better describing interactions within the region. Analysis of urban-rural social and economic factors indicates that 84.42% of research on territorial spatial evolution in the fringe area focuses on land, population, and economic factor interactions. However, other critical factors necessitate further research. The fringe area can be understood from a systematic and integrated perspective, encompassing urban, rural, and field spaces, with the urban-rural fringe area being the most widely recognized framework. Thus, future work should focus on enhancing the theoretical framework of urban fringe areas and gathering data to establish a comprehensive evaluation system that considers multiple factors, scales, and dimensions. Moreover, dynamic research on small and medium cities over a long period is crucial. This will enable the investigation of inter-regional correlations and couplings, leading to rational planning and sustainable urban-space development.
Bing XUE , Bo FU . Conceptual evolution and classification system reconstruction of urban fringe[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023 , 46(11) : 1903 -1914 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.111
| [1] | 郭华东, 梁栋, 陈方, 等. 地球大数据促进联合国可持续发展目标实现[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(8): 874-884. |
| [1] | [ Guo Huadong, Liang Dong, Chen Fang, et al. Big earth data facilitates sustainable development goals[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(8): 874-884. ] |
| [2] | 张春荣, 刘春芳, 张志英, 等. “流空间”视角下省际边缘区城乡要素空间流动特征与优化——以庆阳市为例[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(8): 113-120. |
| [2] | [ Zhang Chunrong, Liu Chunfang, Zhang Zhiying, et al. The spatial flow characteristics and optimization of urban and rural elements in provincsial fringe areas from the perspective of “flow space”: A case study of Qingyang[J]. Soft Science, 2021, 35(8): 113-120. ] |
| [3] | 张杰, 盛科荣, 王传阳. 中国城市网络的核心-边缘结构演化研究——基于证券服务联系的视角[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(5): 1659-1670. |
| [3] | [ Zhang Jie, Sheng Kerong, Wang Chuanyang. Core-periphery dynamics of the urban network in China: A study based on securities service relationships[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(5): 1659-1670. ] |
| [4] | 邢忠. 边缘区与边缘效应[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 30-68. |
| [4] | [ Xing Zhong. Fringe area and fringe effect[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2007: 30-68. ] |
| [5] | 韩炜, 蔡建明, 赵一夫. 多元主体视角下大城市边缘区空间治理结构、机制及路径研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(10): 1730-1745. |
| [5] | [ Han Wei, Cai Jianming, Zhao Yifu. Structure, mechanism, and paths of spatial governance in metropolitan fringe with the participation of multi-subjects[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(10): 1730-1745. ] |
| [6] | 刘彦随, 严镔, 王艳飞. 新时期中国城乡发展的主要问题与转型对策[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(7): 1-8. |
| [6] | [ Liu Yansui, Yan Bin, Wang Yanfei. Urban-rural development problems and transformation counter measures in the new period in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(7): 1-8. ] |
| [7] | 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. |
| [7] | [ Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. ] |
| [8] | 邢忠, 汤西子, 徐晓波. 城市边缘区生态环境保护研究综述[J]. 国际城市规划, 2014, 29(5): 30-41. |
| [8] | [ Xing Zhong, Tang Xizi, Xu Xiaobo. Review of research and management on ecological environment conservation of urban fringe zone[J]. Urban Planning International, 2014, 29(5): 30-41. ] |
| [9] | Cui L, Wang J, Sun L, et al. Construction and optimization of green space ecological networks in urban fringe areas: A case study with the urban fringe area of Tongzhou District in Beijing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276(10): 124266, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro. 2020.124266. |
| [10] | 田健, 黄晶涛, 曾穗平. 基于复合生态平衡的城市边缘区生态安全格局重构——以铜陵东湖地区为例[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(2): 92-97. |
| [10] | [ Tian Jian, Huang Jingtao, Zeng Suiping. Research on the reconstruction of ecological security pattern in urban fringe based on the compound ecological balance: A case study of Donghu District in Tongling City[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(2): 92-97. ] |
| [11] | Liu Z L, Robinson G M. Residential development in the peri-urban fringe: The example of Adelaide, south Australia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57: 179-192. |
| [12] | Wang Y, Han Y L, Pu L J, et al. A novel model for detecting urban fringe and its expanding patterns: An application in Harbin City, China[J]. Land, 2021, 10(8): 876, doi: 10.3390/land10080876. |
| [13] | Theobald D M. Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe[J]. Geographical Review, 2001, 91(3): 544-564. |
| [14] | 曹广忠, 缪杨兵, 刘涛. 基于产业活动的城市边缘区空间划分方法——以北京主城区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(3): 771-780. |
| [14] | [ Cao Guangzhong, Miao Yangbing, Liu Tao. Seeking a method for identifying the urban fringe spatially based on industrial activities: A case study of Beijing City[J]. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(3): 771-780. ] |
| [15] | 周玉璇, 李郇, 申龙. 资本循环视角下的城市空间结构演变机制研究——以海珠区为例[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(4): 68-75. |
| [15] | [ Zhou Yuxuan, Li Xun, Shen Long. Research on the evolution mechanism of urban spatial structure in the view of capital circuit theory of harvey: A case of Haizhu District[J]. Human Geography, 2018, 33(4): 68-75. ] |
| [16] | Mckain W C, Burnight R G. The sociological significance of the rural urban fringe from the rural point of view[J]. Rural Sociology, 1953, 18(2): 108-120. |
| [17] | 魏伟, 周婕. 中国大城市边缘区的概念辨析及其划分[J]. 人文地理, 2006, 21(4): 29-33. |
| [17] | [ Zhou Jie. The concept and dividing on urban fringe in China[J]. Human Geography, 2006, 21(4): 29-33. ] |
| [18] | Mcgee T G. The emergence of Desakota regions in Asia: Expanding hypothesis in Ginsburg, the extended metropolis: Settlement transition in Asia[M]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1991: 1-10. |
| [19] | 姚月. 城市边缘区空间发展探讨——以北京市海淀区为例[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2014, 16(2): 214-224. |
| [19] | [ Yao Yue. Spatial development of urban fringe: A case study of Haidian District, Beijing[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2014, 16(2): 214-224. ] |
| [20] | Zhao P J, Zhang M Z. Informal suburbanization in Beijing: An investigation of informal gated communities on the urban fringe[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 77: 130-142. |
| [21] | 孙施文, 冷方兴. 上海城市边缘区空间形态演变研究——以闵行区莘庄镇为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2017(6): 16-24. |
| [21] | [ Sun Shiwen, Leng Fangxing. Study on the spatial morphology evolution of Shanghai urban fringe: A case study of Xinzhuang Town, Minhang District[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2017(6): 16-24. ] |
| [22] | 吴廷烨, 刘云刚, 王丰龙. 城乡结合部流动人口聚居区的空间生产——以广州市瑞宝村为例[J]. 人文地理, 2013, 28(6): 86-91. |
| [22] | [ Wu Tingye, Liu Yungang, Wang Fenglong. Production of space in the urban-rural frontier: A case study of Rainbow, a floating population concentrated community in Guangzhou[J]. Human Geography, 2013, 28(6): 86-91. ] |
| [23] | Feng L, Du P J, Zhu L J, et al. Investigating sprawl along China’s urban fringe from a spatio-temporal perspective[J]. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 2016, 9(2): 233-250. |
| [24] | 齐建华. 城乡接合部应实行土地一体化管理[J]. 中国土地, 2015(10): 50-51. |
| [24] | [ Qi Jianhua. Land integration management shall be carried out by the urban-rural junction ministry[J]. China Land, 2015(10): 50-51. ] |
| [25] | 赵自胜, 陈金. 城乡结合部土地利用研究——以开封市为例[J]. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 1996(1): 67-70. |
| [25] | [ Zhao Zisheng, Chen Jin. A study on the land utilization of transition region of city and countryside: Take Kaifeng for example[J]. Journal of Henan University (Natural Science Edition), 1996(1): 67-70. ] |
| [26] | 黄公元. 城乡结合部的流动人口[J]. 杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版), 1998(1): 119-124. |
| [26] | [ Huang Gongyuan. Floating population at the urban-rural fringe[J]. Journal of Hangzhou Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 1998(1): 119-124. ] |
| [27] | 刘洪彬, 王秋兵, 董秀茹, 等. 城乡结合部区域农户土地利用行为差异及其政策启示——以沈阳市苏家屯区238户农户调查为例[J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(5): 113-119. |
| [27] | [ Liu Hongbin, Wang Qiubing, Dong Xiuru, et al. The characteristic and policy implication of the farmer land use in rural-urban fringe: A case study in Sujiatun District of Shenyang City, Liaoning Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2012, 32(5): 113-119. ] |
| [28] | 刘玉, 郑国楠. 城乡结合部功能定位与规划管理国际经验[J]. 国际城市规划, 2014, 29(4): 33-38. |
| [28] | [ Liu Yu, Zheng Guonan. Function, planning and administration of rural-urban fringe: International experience discussion[J]. Urban Planning International, 2014, 29(4): 33-38. ] |
| [29] | 余强毅, 陈佑启, 许新国. 土地利用科学中的“城乡交错带”概念辨析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2010, 24(8): 46-51. |
| [29] | [ Yu Qiangyi, Chen Youqi, Xu Xinguo. Concept discrimination on “rural-urban fringe” in land use science[J]. China Land Science, 2010, 24(8): 46-51. ] |
| [30] | 陈佑启. 城乡交错带名辩[J]. 地理学与国土研究, 1995(1): 47-52. |
| [30] | [ Chen Youqi. Discrimination of rural-urban fringe[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 1995(1): 47-52. ] |
| [31] | 张海鹏. 中国城乡关系演变70年: 从分割到融合[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(3): 2-18. |
| [31] | [ Zhang Haipeng. The evolution of China’s urban-rural relations in the past seven decades: From separation to integration[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(3): 2-18. ] |
| [32] | 杨俊宴, 马奔. 城市阴影区的形态特征及模式机制研究——上海“人-地-业”多源大数据视角的实证[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43(9): 95-106. |
| [32] | [ Yang Junyan, Ma Ben. Morphological characteristics and pattern mechanism of urban shadow area: A case study of Shanghai’s “human-land-industry” from a multi-source big data perspective[J]. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(9): 95-106. ] |
| [33] | 张京祥, 庄林德. 大都市阴影区演化机理及对策研究[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 2000(6): 687-692. |
| [33] | [ Zhang Jingxiang, Zhuang Linde. Mechanism of metropolitan shadow area evolution and its countermeasures[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Science Edition), 2000(6): 687-692. ] |
| [34] | 杨俊宴, 胡昕宇. 中心区圈核结构的阴影区现象研究[J]. 城市规划, 2012, 36(10): 26-33. |
| [34] | [ Yang Junyan, Hu Xinyu. Study on shadow area of city centers in circle-core structure mode[J]. City Planning Review, 2012, 36(10): 26-33. ] |
| [35] | 刘盛和, 张擎. 杭州市半城市化地区空间分布变化[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(5): 982-992. |
| [35] | [ Liu Shenghe, Zhang Qing. The change of spatial distribution of peri-urbanization areas in Hangzhou Municipality[J]. Geographical Research, 2008, 27(5): 982-992. ] |
| [36] | 陈贝贝. 半城市化地区的识别方法及其驱动机制研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 210-220. |
| [36] | [ Chen Beibei. Review on identification method and driving mechanism of peri-urban area[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(2): 210-220. ] |
| [37] | 何为, 黄贤金. 半城市化: 中国城市化进程中的两类异化现象研究[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2012(2): 24-32. |
| [37] | [ He Wei, Huang Xianjin. Semi-urbanization: Two types of alienation in the process of urbanization in China[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2012(2): 24-32. ] |
| [38] | 杨舒雅, 李刚. 我国半城市化空间的研究进展[J]. 南方建筑, 2020(6): 96-103. |
| [38] | [ Yang Shuya, Li Gang. The progression of peri-urbanized spaces in China[J]. South Architecture, 2020(6): 96-103. ] |
| [39] | 曹鸿兴, 封国林. 界壳论及其应用[J]. 气象科技进展, 2016, 6(1): 54-57. |
| [39] | [ Cao Hongxing, Feng Guolin. Bounded shell theory and its applications[J]. Advances in Meteorological Science and Technology, 2016, 6(1): 54-57. ] |
| [40] | 乔家君. 中国乡村社区空间论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 69-110. |
| [40] | [ Qiao Jiajun. Spatial theory of rural communities in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011: 69-110. ] |
| [41] | 马建华, 千怀遂, 管华, 等. 秦岭-黄淮平原交界带自然地理若干特征分析[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24(6): 666-673. |
| [41] | [ Ma Jianhua, Qian Huaisui, Guan Hua, et al. Some features of physical geography in transitional region between Qinling Mountains and Huanghuai Plain[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(6): 666-673. ] |
| [42] | Browder J O. The urban-rural interface: Urbanization and tropical forest cover change[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2002, 6: 21-41. |
| [43] | 李克煌, 管华, 马建华, 等. 自然地理界面理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1996: 50-86. |
| [43] | [ Li Kehuang, Guan Hua, Ma Jianhua, et al. Physical geography interface theory and practice[J]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1996: 50-86. ] |
| [44] | Borsdorf A. Population growth and urbanization in Latin America[J]. GeoJournal, 1978, 2(1): 47-60. |
| [45] | Tonini M, Parente J, Pereira M G. Global assessment of rural-urban interface in portugal related to land cover changes[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2018, 18(6): 1647-1664. |
| [46] | 乔家君, 马玉玲. 城乡界面的经济效应[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(9): 1-9. |
| [46] | [ Qiao Jiajun, Ma Yuling. Empirical analysis of economic effect of urban-rural interface[J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(9): 1-9. ] |
| [47] | 汤国安, 李吉龙, 熊礼阳, 等. 论地理边界的科学属性与表达[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(11): 2841-2852. |
| [47] | [ Tang Guo’an, Li Jilong, Xiong Liyang, et al. Scientific attributes and expression methods of geographical boundary[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(11): 2841-2852. ] |
| [48] | 周婷, 彭少麟. 边缘效应的空间尺度与测度[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(7): 3322-3333. |
| [48] | [ Zhou Ting, Peng Shaolin. Spatial scale and measurement of edge effect in ecology[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(7): 3322-3333. ] |
| [49] | 孙东琪, 张京祥, 胡毅, 等. “大都市阴影区”嘉兴市的形成机制解析——兼与苏州市的发展差异研究[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(1): 66-71. |
| [49] | [ Sun Dongqi, Zhang Jingxiang, Hu Yi, et al. Metropolitan shadow-analyze of the foundation of Jiaxing and the evolutionary diversity between Suzhou and Jiangsu[J]. Human Geography, 2014, 29(1): 66-71. ] |
| [50] | 金东海, 秦文利. 论城市化发展的自然资源基础[J]. 人文地理, 2004, 19(4): 64-67. |
| [50] | [ Jin Donghai, Qin Wenli. On natural resources base for urbanization[J]. Human Geography, 2004, 19(4): 64-67. ] |
| [51] | 薛冰, 李宏庆, 黄蓓佳, 等. 数据驱动的社会-经济-自然复合生态系统研究:尺度、过程及其决策关联[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3169-3176. |
| [51] | [ Xue Bing, Li Hongqing, Huang Beijia, et al. Data-driven study of complex socio-economic-natural ecosystems: Scales, processes and decision linkages[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(12): 3169-3176. ] |
| [52] | Peng J, Hu Y N, Liu Y X, et al. A new approach for urban-rural fringe identification: Integrating impervious surface area and spatial continuous wavelet transform[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 175: 72-79. |
| [53] | Yang J, Dong J W, Sun Y Z, et al. A constraint-based approach for identifying the urban-rural fringe of polycentric cities using multi-sourced data[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2022, 36(1): 114-136. |
| [54] | 裴鹰, 杨俊, 李冰心, 等. 城市边缘区生态承载力时空分异研究——以甘井子区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(5): 1715-1724. |
| [54] | [ Pei Ying, Yang Jun, Li Bingxin, et al. Study on spatial-temporal differentiation of ecological carrying capacity in urban fringe areas at community scale: A case study of Ganjingzi District in Dalian[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(5): 1715-1724. ] |
| [55] | Ning F, Ou S J, Hsu C Y, et al. Analysis of landscape spatial pattern changes in urban fringe area: A case study of Hunhe Niaodao Area in Shenyang City[J]. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2021, 17(4): 411-425. |
| [56] | Nallathiga R, Taneja S, Gupta A, et al. Sustainability of urban fringe development and management in NCT-Delhi: A case study[C]// Mukherjee J. Sustainable Urbanization in India. Exploring Urban Change in South Asia. Singapore: Springer, 2018. |
| [57] | 薛冰, 赵冰玉, 李京忠. 地理大数据中POI数据质量的评估与提升方法[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78(5): 1290-1303. |
| [57] | [ Xue Bing, Zhao Bingyu, Li Jingzhong. Evaluation and enhancement methods of POI data quality in the context of geographic big data[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(5): 1290-1303. ] |
| [58] | 周德, 戚佳玲, 钟文钰. 城乡融合评价研究综述: 内涵辨识、理论认知与体系重构[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(10): 2634-2651. |
| [58] | [ Zhou De, Qi Jialing, Zhong Wenyu. Review of urban-rural integration evaluation: Connotation identification, theoretical analysis, and system reconstruction[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(10): 2634-2651. ] |
| [59] | 张赓, 徐保风. 习近平生态文明思想研究述评[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 13(6): 7-14. |
| [59] | [ Zhang Geng, Xu Baofeng. A review of Xi Jinping’s thoughts on ecological civilization[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 13(6): 7-14. ] |
| [60] | Peng J, Liu Q H, Blaschke T, et al. Integrating land development size, pattern, and density to identify urban-rural fringe in a metropolitan region[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2020, 35(9): 2045-2059. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
