收稿日期: 2021-01-06
修回日期: 2021-04-01
网络出版日期: 2021-12-03
基金资助
国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAD06B00)
Land use transformation based on production-living-ecological functions and associated eco-environment effects: A case study in Yuli County
Received date: 2021-01-06
Revised date: 2021-04-01
Online published: 2021-12-03
为探讨尉犁县土地利用功能转型及其生态环境效应,利用1993、2001、2009、2017年4期TM影像数据解译获取土地利用变化数据,按照“三生”功能分类,通过面积加权法、土地利用转移矩阵、生态环境质量指数等方法,定量分析尉犁县土地利用功能数量变化、土地利用功能转型及其引致的生态环境效应。结果表明:(1) 1993—2017年,生产用地和生活用地持续增加,生态用地总体减少;土地利用功能转型中转入转出面积最大的是牧草生态用地,其次为其他生态用地,城镇生活用地转入转出面积最小。(2) 尉犁县生态环境质量指数,由1993年的0.07629减至2001年的0.06378,随后持续增至2017年的0.07339,整体生态环境质量有所恶化,但处于慢慢恢复改善状态。(3) 其他生态用地转入湿地生态用地和牧草生态用地是生态环境质量改善的主要原因,相反,其他生态用地和农业生产用地对牧草生态用地的占用则是生态环境质量恶化的主要原因。总体来看,过去25 a尉犁县生态环境恶化和改善趋势并存,但其改善趋势大于其恶化趋势。
帕茹克·吾斯曼江,郝晋珉,王楠,史云扬,张金懿,阿依吐尔逊·沙木西 . 基于“三生”功能的土地利用转型及其生态环境效应——以尉犁县为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021 , 44(6) : 1612 -1622 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000–6060.2021.06.10
Presently, based on the production-living-ecological function, the regional understanding of the transformation of land use function and the research results on eco-environmental effects in northwest eco-environmentally vulnerable areas of China remain relatively rare. Accordingly, this paper attempts to reveal the impact of land use function transformation on the ecological environment, hoping to provide a reference for promoting the rational allocation of regional land resources and guide the sustainable development of ecologically vulnerable areas to help construct an ecological civilization. We used thematic mapper image data from 1993, 2001, 2009, and 2017 to obtain land use change data of Yuli County, Xinjiang, China. According to the production-living-ecological function classification, we quantitatively analyzed the land use function change, land use function transformation, and the ecological impact in Yuli County using an area weighting method, land use transfer matrix, eco-environmental quality index, and ecological contribution rate of land use function transformation, among other methods. The results demonstrated the following: (1) From 1993 to 2017, both the area of production land and that of living land continued to increase, and the ecological land decreased as a whole. According to the transformation of land use function, the largest transfer-out area was grassland ecological land, followed by other ecological lands, whereas the urban living land was the smallest such area. (2) The ecological environment quality index of Yuli County decreased from 0.07629 in 1993 to 0.06378 in 2001, after which it continued to increase to 0.07339 in 2017. The overall ecological environment quality deteriorated but then entered a state of gradual recovery and improvement. (3) The transfer of other ecological lands with low ecological environment quality index to wetland ecological land and forage ecological land was the dominant factor in the improvement of ecological environment quality. By contrast, the occupation of forage ecological land by other ecological land and agricultural production land was the dominant factor in the deterioration of environmental quality. Generally speaking, over the past 25 years, trends of ecological environment deterioration and improvement have coexisted, although the trend of improvement has been stronger than that of deterioration.
[1] | 黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3):378-391. |
[1] | [ Huang Jinchuan, Lin Haoxi, Qi Xiaoxiao. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(3):378-391. ] |
[2] | 李广东, 方创琳. 城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1):49-65. |
[2] | [ Li Guangdong, Fang Chuanglin. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1):49-65. ] |
[3] | Grainger A. National land use morphology[J]. Geography, 1995, 80(3):235-245. |
[4] | 龙花楼. 土地利用转型——土地利用/覆被变化综合研究的新途径[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2003, 19(1):87-90. |
[4] | [ Long Hualou. Land use transition: A new integrated approach of land use/cover change study[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2003, 19(1):87-90. ] |
[5] | 高星, 刘泽伟, 李晨曦, 等. 基于“三生空间”的雄安新区土地利用功能转型与生态环境效应研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20):7113-7122. |
[5] | [ Gao Xing, Liu Zewei, Li Chenxi, et al. Land use function transformation in the Xiong’an New Area based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(20):7113-7122. ] |
[6] | 杨清可, 段学军, 王磊, 等. 基于“三生空间”的土地利用转型与生态环境效应——以长江三角洲核心区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(1):97-106. |
[6] | [ Yang Qingke, Duan Xuejun, Wang Lei, et al. Land use transformation based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects: A case study in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(1):97-106. ] |
[7] | 田培, 龚雨薇, 朱占亮, 等. 三峡水库坝区生态屏障区近25年土地利用变化评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):78-85. |
[7] | [ Tian Pei, Gong Yuwei, Zhu Zhanliang, et al. Evaluation of land use change in the ecological barrier zone of the dam area of the Three Gorges Reservoir in recent 25 years[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(2):78-85. ] |
[8] | 张帅, 汪洋, 夏婷婷, 等. 塔里木河生态输水条件下土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(3):739-749. |
[8] | [ Zhang Shuai, Wang Yang, Xia Tingting, et al. Effects of land use/cover change on ecosystem service value under the ecological water conveyance of Tarim River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(3):739-749. ] |
[9] | 马新萍, 韩申山, 王磊, 等. 大西安地区土地利用类型时空演变分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(2):499-507. |
[9] | [ Ma Xinping, Han Shenshan, Wang Lei, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution of land use types in the greater Xi’an area[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(2):499-507. ] |
[10] | 王宁, 杨光, 韩雪莹, 等. 内蒙古1990—2018年土地利用变化及生态系统服务价值[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5):244-250. |
[10] | [ Wang Ning, Yang Guang, Han Xueying, et al. Land use change and ecosystem service value in Inner Mongolia from 1990 to 2018[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(5):244-250. ] |
[11] | 王权, 李阳兵, 黄娟, 等. 喀斯特槽谷区土地利用转型过程对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(3):192-198. |
[11] | [ Wang Quan, Li Yangbing, Huang Juan, et al. Effect of land use transformation process on ecosystem service value in Karst trough valley area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(3):192-198. ] |
[12] | 龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与土地资源管理[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(9):1607-1618. |
[12] | [ Long Hualou. Land use transition and land management[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(9):1607-1618. ] |
[13] | 陈龙, 周生路, 周兵兵, 等. 基于主导功能的江苏省土地利用转型特征与驱动力[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(2):155-162. |
[13] | [ Chen Long, Zhou Shenglu, Zhou Bingbing, et al. Characteristics and driving forces of regional land use transition based on the leading function classification: A case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(2):155-162. ] |
[14] | 宋小青. 论土地利用转型的研究框架[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3):471-487. |
[14] | [ Song Xiaoqing. Discussion on land use transition research framework[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(3):471-487. ] |
[15] | 陈会, 李阳兵, 盛佳利. 基于土地利用变化的贵州坝子土地利用功能演变研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(24):9325-9338. |
[15] | [ Chen Hui, Li Yangbing, Sheng Jiali. Study on the evolution of land use function of basins based on land use change in Guizhou Province, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(24):9325-9338. ] |
[16] | 田俊峰, 王彬燕, 王士君. 东北地区土地利用转型特征测度与机制探索[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(9):184-195. |
[16] | [ Tian Junfeng, Wang Binyan, Wang Shijun. Land use transition in northeast China: Features measurement and mechanism exploration[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(9):184-195. ] |
[17] | 胡守庚, 童陆亿, 龙花楼. 论土地利用转型潜力及其评价的理论框架[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6):1367-1377. |
[17] | [ Hu Shougeng, Tong Luyi, Long Hualou. Land use transition potential and itsassessment framework[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(6):1367-1377. ] |
[18] | 张晓琳, 金晓斌, 范业婷, 等. 1995—2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4):689-706. |
[18] | [ Zhang Xiaolin, Jin Xiaobin, Fan Yeting, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination status of the land use function transition in Jiangsu Province from 1995 to 2015[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4):689-706. ] |
[19] | 龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 土地利用转型与乡村振兴[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(7):1-6. |
[19] | [ Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang. Land use transition and rural vitalization[J]. China Land Science, 2018, 32(7):1-6. ] |
[20] | 帕茹克·吾斯曼江, 阿依吐尔逊·沙木西, 刘新平, 等. 尉犁县土地利用/覆被变化的区域生态系统服务价值变化[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(3):325-330, 338. |
[20] | [ Wusimanjiang Paruke, Shamuxi Ayituerxun, Liu Xinping, et al. Change of regional ecosystem service value in the region with land use/cover change in Yuli County[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(3):325-330, 338. ] |
[21] | 张鹏飞, 古丽·加帕尔, 包安明, 等. 塔里木河流域近期综合治理工程生态成效评估[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(1):156-164. |
[21] | [ Zhang Pengfei, Jiapaer Guli, Bao Anming, et al. Ecological effects evaluation for short term planning of the Tarim River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2017, 40(1):156-164. ] |
[22] | 梁小英, 段宁, 刘康. 土地利用功能变化与农户响应研究进展[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(2):385-391. |
[22] | [ Liang Xiaoying, Duan Ning, Liu Kang. Research review on the land use function change and the farmers’response[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(2):385-391. ] |
[23] | 焦露, 薛哲进, 尹剑, 等. “三生空间”视角下喀斯特地区土地利用转型的生态环境效应——以贵州省为例[J]. 生态经济, 2020, 36(4):206-212. |
[23] | [ Jiao Lu, Xue Zhejin, Yin Jian, et al. Eco-environmental effects of land use transition in Karst area based on the view of“ecological-production-living spaces”: Taking Guizhou Province as an example[J]. Ecological Economy, 2020, 36(4):206-212. ] |
[24] | Asabere S B, Acheampong R A, Ashiagbor G, et al. Urbanization, land use transformation and spatio-environmental impacts: Analyses of trends and implications in major metropolitan regions of Ghana[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 96, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol. 2020.104707. |
[25] | 苑韶峰, 唐奕钰, 申屠楚宁. 土地利用转型时空演变及其生态环境效应——基于长江经济带127个地级市的实证研究[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(9):174-181. |
[25] | [ Yuan Shaofeng, Tang Yiyu, Shentu Chuning. Spatiotemporal change of land-use transformation and its eco-environmental response: A case of 127 counties in Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(9):174-181. ] |
[26] | 田俊峰, 王彬燕, 程利莎, 等. 政策主导下的区域土地利用转型过程与机制——以中国东北地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4):805-821. |
[26] | [ Tian Junfeng, Wang Binyan, Cheng Lisha, et al. The process and mechanism of regional land use transition guided by policy: A case study of northeast China[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(4):805-821. ] |
[27] | 许凤娇, 吕晓, 陈昌玲. 山东省城乡建设用地转型的时空格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(9):1554-1567. |
[27] | [ Xu Fengjiao, Lü Xiao, Chen Changlin. Spatial-temporal pattern of urban-rural construction land transition in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(9):1554-1567. ] |
[28] | 刘永强, 龙花楼, 李加林. 长江中游经济带土地利用转型及其生态服务功能交叉敏感性研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(5):1009-1022. |
[28] | [ Liu Yongqiang, Long Hualou, Li Jialin. Study on the land use transition and its cross-sensitivity of ecological service function in the middle of Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(5):1009-1022. ] |
[29] | 戈大专, 龙花楼, 屠爽爽, 等. 黄淮海地区土地利用转型与粮食产量耦合关系研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2017, 34(4):319-327. |
[29] | [ Ge Dazhuan, Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang, et al. Coupling relationship between land use transitions and grain yield in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2017, 34(4):319-327. ] |
[30] | 陈万旭, 李江风, 冉端. 长江中游城市群土地利用转型和城镇化之间的空间关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(5):1036-1048. |
[30] | [ Chen Wanxu, Li Jiangfeng, Ran Duan. On the spatial relationship between land use transition and urbanization in the middle Yangtze River urban cluster[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(5):1036-1048. ] |
[31] | 刘永强, 廖柳文, 龙花楼, 等. 土地利用转型的生态系统服务价值效应分析——以湖南省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(4):691-700. |
[31] | [ Liu Yongqiang, Liao Liuwen, Long Hualou, et al. Effects of land use transitions on ecosystem services value: A case study of Hunan Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(4):691-700. ] |
[32] | 吕立刚, 周生路, 周兵兵, 等. 区域发展过程中土地利用转型及其生态环境响应研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(12):1442-1449. |
[32] | [ Lü Ligang, Zhou Shenglu, Zhou Bingbing, et al. Land use transformation and its eco-environmental response in process of the regional development: A case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(12):1442-1449. ] |
/
〈 | 〉 |