收藏 ｜ 设为首页 广告服务 ｜ 联系我们 ｜ 在线留言
高级检索

干旱区地理 >

2020 , Vol. 43 >Issue 6: 1667 - 1678

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.06.28

新疆乡村聚落特征及其区域融合发展探析

展开
  • 1 新疆大学资源与环境科学学院，新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046； 2 绿洲生态教育部重点实验室，新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046
张惠婷（1995-），女，新疆维吾尔自治区奎屯市，硕士研究生，研究方向为绿洲聚落景观与生态环境. E-mail：zhanght155@163.com

收稿日期: 2019-07-19

  修回日期: 2020-09-07

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金联合基金（NSFC—新疆联合基金）重点项目（U1603241）；国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目（41861037）

收起

Characteristics and regional integration development of rural settlements in Xinjiang

Expand
  • 1 College of Resources and Environment Science, Xinjiang University，Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Ministry of Education, Urumqi 830046，Xinjiang, China

Received date: 2019-07-19

  Revised date: 2020-09-07

  Online published: 2020-11-25

Fold

摘要

把握兵地聚落差异，以期为新疆兵地融合发展提供理论依据。基于土地利用数据，运用探 索式空间统计模型定量分析天山北坡兵地乡村聚落空间格局与经济发展差异，并基于其差异对其 融合发展提出相应对策。结果表明：（1）天山北坡兵团与地方乡村聚落在空间、规模、区位以及形 态分布特征上均呈现出明显的空间差异，乡村聚落空间整体上呈集聚分布模式，地方聚落集聚态 势较明显；聚落规模呈低值集聚的分布特征，兵团聚落大多为大规模聚落斑块，地方聚落则相反； 乡村聚落的分布具有明显的高程、坡度、道路、河流、城镇指向性，而兵团聚落分布于区位条件较差 地区；在乡村聚落的外部形态复杂度上，地方聚落大于兵团聚落；（2）经济发展方面，天山北坡整体 经济发展较为良好，兵团人均地区生产总值较高，以农业作为主要产业，地方经济结构较为多样， 除农业外，牧业也是其主要产业；（3）基于兵地聚落间差异，提出相应的融合对策，在空间格局上， 根据实际情况适当进行兵地聚落的迁移合并；在经济发展方面，有效利用优势互补原则，推进兵地 间产业融和。

关键词： 乡村聚落; 融合; 新疆

本文引用格式

张惠婷, 马利刚, 王宏卫, 王正伟, 高一薄, 樊 影 . 新疆乡村聚落特征及其区域融合发展探析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020 , 43(6) : 1667 -1678 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.06.28

Abstract

The northern slope of Tianshan Mountains has the largest continuous oasis in Xinjiang, China, and it is also the most economically developed area of Xinjiang. Comparative analysis of rural settlements in the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains determines the differences of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC) and local rural settlements and provides corresponding countermeasures for its integration and development to provide theoretical basis for the integration and development of XPCC and the local settlements in Xinjiang. Based on the land use data and exploratory spatial statistical model, differences of the spatial pattern and economic development of rural settlements in the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains are quantitatively analyzed and the corresponding countermeasures are put forward based on their differences. The results show that: with respect to the spatial distribution characteristics, scale distribution characteristics, location distribution characteristics, and morphological characteristics of the XPCC and local rural settlements in the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains show obvious spatial differences. In spatial distribution characteristics, the rural settlements space show agglomeration distribution pattern with high density in the center and low density in the surrounding. The ANN value of local settlements is larger than that of XPCC. So, the agglomeration trend of the local settlements is obvious. Density of local settlements is mainly in the range of 0.12 to 0.83 per square kilometer, and XPCC settlements are located in the area with a density of 0.12 to 0.38 per square kilometer. In location distribution, with the increase of elevation and slope, the number of rural settlements in the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains gradually decreases. Among them, 51% of the settlements are in the range of 200 m to 600 m elevation, while 76% of the settlements are in the range of 0° to 6° slope. The settlements of XPCC are distributed in the flat area of the downstream oasis than the local settlements. The distribution of rural settlements is influenced by factors of road, river, and town. About 50% of the settlements are within 0 km to 5 km of road and river, and within 0 km to 30 km of town. Compared with the local settlements, the XPCC settlements are located in poor conditions far from road, river, and town. In terms of the complexity of the external form of the rural settlements, the morphological characteristics of patch in settlement area are different. Because the construction and development of XPCC settlements are man-made interventions, its Landscape shape index LSI is smaller than that of the local settlements and the external form of settlement patch is more regular. The overall economic development of the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains is relatively good and the per capita gross domestic product of XPCC is higher than local. Moreover, agriculture is the main industry, the local economic structure is diversified, and in addition to agriculture, animal husbandry is main industry. In the end, taking economic development as the goal, the principle of seeking common ground while reserving differences must be adhered. Based on the differences between XPCC and local settlements, corresponding integration countermeasures must be put forward. In the spatial pattern, according to the actual situation, carrying out relocation and merging of the XPCC and local settlements promote the construction of new cities in XPCC. In the aspect of economic development, the principle of complementary advantages should be effectively used to promote the industrial integration between XPCC and local. This study aims to promote the integration development of the XPCC and local in the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains.

Key words： rural settlements; integration; Xinjiang

参考文献

[1] 周国华, 贺艳华, 唐承丽, 等. 中国农村聚居演变的驱动机制及 态势分析[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(4): 515-524. [ZHOU Guohua, HE Yanhua, TANG Chengli, et al. Dynamic mechanism and pres⁃ ent situation of rural settlement evolution in China[J], Acta Geo⁃ graphica Sinica, 2011, 66(4): 515-524. ] [2] 马利邦, 田亚亚, 谢作轮, 等. 微观尺度绿洲乡村聚落质量评价 及其空间重构[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(5): 227-234, 295- 296. [MA Libang, TIAN Yaya, XIE Zuolun, et al. Evaluation of quality and spatial reconstruction of oasis rural settlements based on micro- scale[J]. Transaction of Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(5): 227-234, 295-296. ] [3] GALLO D, CIMINALE M, BECKER H, et al. Remote sensing tech⁃ niques for reconstructing a vast Neolithic settlement in southern It⁃ aly[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, 36(1): 43-50. [4] BURCHARDT J. Historicizing counterurbanization[J]. Journal of Historical Geography, 2012, 38(2): 109-208. [5] INFANTE- AMATE J, VILLA I, JIMENEZ F, et al. The rise and fall of the cortijo system: Scattered rural settlements and the colo⁃ nization of land in Spain’s Mediterranean mountains since 1581 [J]. Journal of Historical Geography, 2016, 54: 63-75. [6] PAQETTE S, DOMON G. Changing ruralities, changing land⁃ scapes: Exploring social recomposition using a multi-scale approach [J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2003, 19(4). [7] 段小薇, 李小建. 山区县域聚落演化的空间分异特征及其影响 因 素 —— 以 豫 西 山 地 嵩 县 为 例 [J]. 地 理 研 究, 2018, 37(12): 2459- 2474. [DUAN Xiaowei, LI Xiaojian. Spatial differentiation and its influencing factors of settlements evolution in mountainous counties: A case study of Songxian County in western Henan Prov⁃ ince[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 7(12): 2459-2474. ] [8] 师满江, 颉耀文, 曹琦. 干旱区绿洲农村居民点景观格局演变及 机 制 分 析 [J]. 地 理 研 究, 2016, 35(4): 692- 702. [SHI Manjiang, XIE Yaowen, CAO Qi. The landscape evolution and mechanism analysis of rural settlements in the oasis of arid region[J]. Geo⁃ graphical Research, 2016, 35(4): 692-702. ] [9] 张素丽, 佟宝全, 郝晶晶. 牧区聚落时空特征及其形成机制—— 以正蓝旗为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(1): 227-234. [ZHANG Suli, TONG Baoquan, HAO Jingjing. Spatiotemporal evolution and their formation mechanism of settlements in pastoral area: A case study in Zhenglan Banner[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018, 35 (1): 227-234. ] [10] 刘香云, 王宏卫, 杨胜天, 等. 艾比湖流域绿洲乡村聚落空间格 局及其驱动力分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(4): 859-866. [LIU Xiangyun, WANG Hongwei, YANG Shengtian. et al. Spatial pat⁃ tern and driving force of oasis rural settlements in Ebinur Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2018, 41(4): 859-866. ] [11] 马雯秋, 何新, 姜广辉, 等. 基于土地功能的农村居民点内部用 地结构分类[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(4): 269-277. [MA Wen⁃ qiu, HE Xin, JIANG Guanghui. et al. Land use internal structure classification of rural settlements based on land use function[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(4): 269-277. ] [12] 刘志林, 李石华, 角媛梅, 等. 基于曲面耕作半径与 MaxENT 模 型 的 哈 尼 梯 田 区 聚 落 格 局 优 化 [J]. 农 业 工 程 学 报, 2019, 35 (20): 242-252. [LIU Zhilin, LI Shihua, JUE Yuanmei, et al. Opti⁃ mization of settlement pattern of Honghe Hani terrace based on surface farming radius and MaxENT model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(20): 242- 252. ] [13] 李传武, 梁双波, 车前进. 主体功能区视角下芜湖市乡村聚落空 间分类与重构[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1736- 1743. [LI Chuanwu, LIANG Shuangbo, CHE Qianjin. Spatial re⁃ construction of the rural settlements in Wuhu City based on the function oriented zoning[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(10): 1736-1743. ] [14] 孟令冉, 吴军, 董霁红. 山丘生态保护区乡村聚落空间分异及格 局优化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(10): 278-286. [MENG Lin⁃ gran, WU Jun, DONG Jihong. Spatial differentiation and layout op⁃ timization of rural settlements in hill ecological protection area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(10): 278－286. ] [15] 洪惠坤.“三生”功能协调下的重庆市乡村空间优化研究[D]. 重 庆: 西 南 大 学, 2016. [HONG Huikun. Research on the rural space optimization of Chongqing City from a coordination of“San⁃ sheng”function[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2016. ] [16] 周亮, 朱彦儒, 孙东琪. 河西走廊城乡居民点空间分异特征及绿 洲孕育度分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(1): 227-236. [ZHOU Li⁃ ang, ZHU Yanru, SUN Dongqi. Spatial differentiation characteris⁃ tics and oasis breed degree of urban and rural residents in Hexi Corridor[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(1): 227-236. ] [17] 张列. 乡村聚落用地功能的演进及其空间分异研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017. [ZHANG Lie. The land use functional evolution and its spatial differentiation of rural settlement[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2017. ] [18] 孙建伟, 孔雪松, 田雅丝, 等. 基于空间组合特征的农村居民点 重构方向识别[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(5): 748-755. [SUN Jian⁃ wei, KONG Xuesong, TIAN Yasi, et al. Identifying reconstruction directions of rural settlements based on analysis of spatial combi⁃ nation features[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(5): 748- 755. ] [19] 王盼. 团场向城市转变过程中的聚落景观变化与发展研究[D]. 乌 鲁 木 齐: 新 疆 大 学, 2019. [WANG Pan. Study on the change and development of settlement landscape during the transition from farm regiment to city[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2019. ] [20] 王保力, 苏向辉, 马瑛, 等. 基于熵权法的新疆兵团新型城镇化 发 展 质 量 评 价 [J]. 数 学 的 实 践 与 认 识, 2018, 48(19): 26- 33. [WANG Baoli, SU Xianghui, MA Ying, et al. The estimation on XPCC’s new-type urbanization development quality[J]. Mathemat⁃ icsin Practice and Theory, 2018, 48(19): 26-33. ] [21] 褚超. 新疆兵地融合发展模式研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2015. [CHU Chao. Xinjiang corps and local government integrated development model research[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2015. ] [22] 李雪伟. 新疆兵地融合发展: 困境破解与体系建构[J]. 新疆农垦 经济, 2017, (5): 28-36. [LI Xuewei. The integration and develop⁃ ment of Xinjiang corps and local: Solving the dilemma and con⁃ structing the system[J]. Xinjiang State Farms Economy, 2017, (5): 28-36. ] [23] 方创琳. 天山北坡城市群可持续发展战略思路与空间布局[J]. 干 旱 区 地 理, 2019, 42(1): 1- 11. [FANG Chuanglin. Strategic thinking and spatial layout for the sustainable development of ur⁃ ban agglomeration in northern slope of Tianshan Mountains[J]. Ar⁃ id Land Geography, 2019, 42(1): 1-11. ] [24] LEI Jun, DONG Wen, YANG Yu. Interactions between water-land resources and oasis urban development at the northern slopes of the Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2012, 4(2): 221-229. [25] 王盼, 王宏卫, 杨胜天, 等. 基于 GIS 的天山北坡聚落地名文化 景观分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(2): 516-524. [WANG Pan, WANG Hongwei, YANG Shengtian, et al. GIS- based analysis of cultural landscapes for settlement names on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(2): 516-524. ] [26] 宋文杰, 张清, 刘莎莎, 等. 基于 LUCC 的干旱区人为干扰与生 态安全分析——以天山北坡经济带绿洲为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(1): 235- 242. [SONG Wenjie, ZHANG Qing, LIU Sha⁃ sha, et al. LUCC-based human disturbance and ecological security in arid area: A case study in the economic zone on northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018, 35(1): 235-242. ] [27] 任平, 洪步庭, 刘寅, 等. 基于 RS 与 GIS 的农村居民点空间变化 特征与景观格局影响研究[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(12): 3331- 3340. [REN Ping, HONG Buting, LIU Yan, et al. A study of spa⁃ tial evolution characteristics of rural settlements and influences of landscape patterns on their distribution using GIS and RS[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(12): 3331-3340. ] [28] 李红波, 张小林, 吴江国, 等. 苏南地区乡村聚落空间格局及其 驱 动 机 制 [J]. 地 理 科 学, 2014, 34(4): 438- 446. [LI Hongbo, ZHANG Xiaolin, WU Jiangguo, et al. Spatial pattern and its driv⁃ ing mechanism of rural settlements in southern Jiangsu[J]. Scien⁃ tia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(4): 438-446. ] [29] 杨慧敏, 娄帆, 李小建. 等. 豫东平原聚落景观格局变化[J]. 生态 学 报, 2017, 37(16): 5313- 5323. [YANG Huimin, LOU Fan, LI Xiaojian, et al. Changing patterns of settlement landscape in the eastern plain of Henan Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(16): 5313-5323. ] [30] 王盼, 王宏卫, 杨胜天, 等. 兵团与地方绿洲乡村聚落格局差异 性 分 析 及 其 驱 动 初 探 [J]. 河 北 师 范 大 学 学 报 ( 自 然 科 学 版), 2019, 43(1): 83-92. [WANG Pan, WANG Hongwei, YANG Sheng⁃ tian, et al. Analysis of oasis rural settlements pattern diversity of XPCC and the locality and its driving[J]. Journal of Heibei Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(1): 83-92. ] [31] 吕敏娟, 郭文炯. 资源型区域乡村聚落规模结构及空间分异动 态 [J]. 经 济 地 理, 2016, 36(12): 126- 134. [LYU Minjuan, GUO Wenjiong. The dynamic hierarchy and spatial differentiation of ru⁃ ral settlements in resource- based region[J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(12): 126-134. ] [32] 李伯华, 曾荣倩, 刘沛林, 等. 基于 CAS 理论的传统村落人居环 境演化研究——以张谷英村为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(10): 1982- 1996. [LI Bohua, ZENG Rongqian, LIU Peilin, et al. Hu⁃ man settlement evolution of traditional village based on theory of complex adaptive system: A case study of Zhangguying Village[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(10): 1982-1996. ] [33] 方创琳. 中国西部地区城市群形成发育现状与建设重点[J]. 干 旱 区 地 理, 2010, 33(5): 667- 675. [FANG Chuanglin. Develop⁃ ment status quo and key points of construction of urban agglomera⁃ tions in west regions of China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2010, 33 (5): 667-675. ] [34] 黄明华, 曹慧泉. 由兵地分治走向兵地融合——新疆工作会议 背景下的呼图壁城镇体系发展探索[J]. 现代城市研究, 2012, 27(2): 60- 66. [HUANG Minghua, CAO Huiquan. From dividing and conquering to integration of corps and local: A study on urban system development of Hutubi against the background of Xinjiang working conference[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2012, 27(2): 60- 66. ] [35] 杨义渊. 新疆“兵地”农业科技服务协同发展——以新疆生产建 设 兵 团 第 12 师 与 乌 鲁 木 齐 市 为 例 [J]. 农 业 工 程, 2019, 9(3): 121- 123. [YANG Yiyuan. Agricultural science and technology services integration development of Xinjiang and XPCC: Taking the twelfth division and Urumqi City as an example[J]. Agricultur⁃ al Engineering, 2019, 9(3): 121-123. ] [36] 陈文新, 袁芳, 杨楠楠. 区域合作格局下的兵地融合发展研究 [J]. 新 疆 农 垦 经 济, 2017, (4): 60- 69. [CHEN Wenxin, YUAN Fang, YANG Nannan. Research on the integration and develop⁃ ment of corps and local of regional cooperation[J]. Xinjiang State Farms Economy, 2017, (4): 60-69. ] [37] 王蕾. 新疆兵团特色城镇化模式与路径研究[D]. 石河子: 石河 子 大 学, 2017. [WANG Lei. Research on characteristic urbaniza⁃ tion mode and path of corps in Xinjiang province[D]. Shihezi: Shi⁃ hezi University, 2017. ] [38] 方健, 杨兴柱, 朱琳. 黄山市乡村聚落空间格局特征及其影响因 素[J]. 热带地理, 2017, 37(2): 277-285, 292. [FANG Jian, YANG Xingzhu, ZHU Lin. Spatial pattern of rural settlements in Huang⁃ shan and its influencing factors[J]. Tropical Geography, 2017, 37 (2): 277-285, 292. ]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉