地表过程研究

黄河下游冲积平原潮土土壤孔隙微形态特征

展开
  • 聊城大学环境与规划学院,山东 聊城 252000
张保华(1971-),男,教授,博士,主要从事土壤地理与微形态、土地资源学研究.E-mail:zhangbaohua@lcu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2019-06-20

  修回日期: 2019-09-04

  网络出版日期: 2020-05-25

基金资助

山东省自然科学基金(ZR2016DM14;山东省高等学校科技发展计划(J15Lh09)资助

Micromorphological characteristics of soil voids of fluvoaquic soil in the alluvial plain of the lower Yellow River

Expand
  • College of Environment and Planning,Liaocheng University,Liaocheng 252000,Shandong,China

Received date: 2019-06-20

  Revised date: 2019-09-04

  Online published: 2020-05-25

摘要

土壤颗粒排列是影响孔隙特征的最基本因素。土壤薄片能够直接观察且定量的分析土壤孔隙特征。为了解不同质地土壤的孔隙差异,于山东省东昌府区采集不同质地土壤(壤土、黏壤土、砂质壤土),通过常规方法和土壤微形态技术对比分析土壤孔隙特征。结果表明:三类样地土壤孔隙度均为表层向下逐渐减少。表层、底层差异在砂质壤土中主要体现于总孔隙度与毛管孔隙度,黏壤土、壤土则主要体现为总孔隙度与非毛管孔隙度。砂质壤土中各土层均以简单堆集孔隙为主;而0~10 cm黏壤土、壤土以复合堆积孔隙为主,其下复合堆积孔隙减少、其他形状孔隙增多。薄片图像测定孔隙数量可反映常规分析总孔隙度的50%左右,对于非毛管孔隙度则可反映80%左右。因此,土壤薄片更适合分析土壤非毛管孔隙。

本文引用格式

张保华, 陶宝先, 曹建荣, 刘子亭 .

黄河下游冲积平原潮土土壤孔隙微形态特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020 , 43(3) : 687 -693 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.03.15

Abstract

The arrangement of soil particles is a basic factor affecting soil pores.The characteristics of soil voids can be directly observed and quantitatively analyzed through the method of soil micromorphology.Liaocheng City is in the west part of Shandong Province,China and is located at the Yellow River alluvial plain.The fluvo-aquic soil accounts for 94% of the total soil area in Liaocheng City.In order to determine the effect of soil texture on soil voids of fluvo-aquic soil,the samples of loam,clay loam,and sandy loam were collected in Liaocheng City.The comparative analysis of soil voids was conducted using the method of soil micromorphology and the normal method of soil physical analysis.The results showed as follows:(1) based on the normal method of soil physical analysis,the average total soil porosity in the depth of 0-25 cm was 54.29% in clay loam,50.16% in sandy loam and 50.40% in loam,and the average soil noncapillary porosity in the depth of 0-25 cm was 43.79% in clay loam,42.00% in sandy loam and 41.11% in loam.(2) the total soil porosity of three types of soil decreased from surface to subsurface soil layer.With respect to sandy loam,the difference of soil porosity between surface and subsurface soil layer is attributed to the soil capillary pores,which decreases from 55.89% to 6.40%.As with loam and clay loam,the difference of soil porosity between surface and subsurface soil layer was ascribed to soil noncapillary porosity.The soil noncapillary porosity decreased from 15.86% in the surface soil layer to 7.22% in the subsurface layer in clay loam and decreased from 16.38% in the surface soil layer to 5.02% in the subsurface layer in loam.(3) according to the thin sections of soil,the main shape of soil void in the depth of 0-25 cm is simple packing voids in the sandy loam.With respect to clay loam and loam,the main shape of soil void is compound packing voids in the depth of 0-10 cm,and the number of compound packing voids decreased in the depth of 10-25 cm,and (4) the total soil porosity analyzed by the thin sections of soil only account for 44.22% to 59.72% of those analyzed by normal method,whereas the soil non-capillary porosity measured by the thin sections of soil account for 73.50% to 95.02%of those measured by normal method.Thus,the thin section of soil is suitable for analyzing the characteristics of non-capillary porosities.

参考文献

[1]孙梅,黄运湘,孙楠,等.农田土壤孔隙及其影响因素研究进展[J].土壤通报,2015,46(1):233-238.[SUN Mei,HUANG Yunxiang,SUN Nan,et al.Advance in soil pore and its influencing factors[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2015,46(1):233-238.] [2]黄昌勇.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:66-97.[HUANG Changyong.Pedology[M].Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2000:66-97.] [3]姚贤良,程云生.土壤物理学[M].北京:农业出版社.1986:84-89.[YAO Xianliang,CHENG Yunsheng.Soil physics[M].Beijing:China Agriculture Press,1986:84-89.] [4]熊毅,李庆逵.中国土壤[M].二版.北京:科学出版社,1987:164-338.[XIONG Yi,LI Qingkui.Chinese soil[M].2nd ed.Beijing:Science Press,1987:164-338.] [5]山东省土壤肥料工作站.山东土壤[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994:173-333.[Shandong Workstation of Soil and Fertilizer.Shandong soils[M].Beijing:China Agriculture Press,1994:173-333.] [6]LARS J M,RICHARD J,BILL D,et al.Relationship between soil aggregate strength, shape and porosity for soils under different long-term management[J].Geoderma, 2016,268:52-59. [7]CHIARA P,NICOLA D F,GIANLUCA S,et al.Nano to macro pore structure changes induced by longterm residue management in three different soils[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2016,217:49-58. [8]周虎,李保国,吕贻忠,等.不同耕作措施下土壤孔隙的多重分形特征[J].土壤学报,2010,47(6):1094-1100.[ZHOU Hu,LI Baoguo,LV Yizhong,et al.Multifractal characteristics of soil pore structure under different tillage systems[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2010,47(6):1094-1100.] [9]郭海斌,冀保毅,王巧锋,等.深耕与秸秆还田对不同质地土壤物理性状和作物产量的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2014,48(4):505-510.[GUO Haibin,JI Baoyi,WANG Qiaofeng,et al.Effects of deep tillage and straw returing on soil physical properties and grain yield of different soil texture[J].Journal of Henan Agricultural University,2014,48(4):505-510.] [10]TOMASZ G,KATARZYNA P,STANISLAW P,et al.Effect of organic farming on a stagnic luvisol soil physical quality[J].Geoderma,2016,282:16-25. [11]赵世伟,赵勇钢,吴金水.黄土高原植被演替下土壤孔隙的定量分析[J].中国科学:地球科学,2010,40(2):223-231.[ZHAO Shiwei,ZHAO Yonggang,WU Jinshui.Quantitative analysis of soil pores under natural vegetation successions on the Loess Plateau[J].Scientia Sinica (Terrae),2010,40(2): 223-231.] [12]刘艳丽,李成亮,高明秀,等.不同土地利用方式对黄河三角洲土壤物理特性的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(15):5183-5190.[LIU Yanli, LI Chengliang, GAO Mingxiu, et al.Effect of different land-use patterns on physical characteristics of the soil in the Yellow River delta region[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(15):5183-5190.] [13]张卫青,庞奖励,张彩云.陕西渭北旱塬典型苹果园土壤基本性质与微形态特征研究[J].干旱区地理,2010,33(4):564-571.[ZHANG Weiqing,PANG Jiangli,ZHANG Caiyun.Soil properties and soil micromorphological characteristics of the apple orchard in the Weibei Dry High land,Shaanxi Province[J].Arid Land Geography,2010,33(4):564-571.] [14]张金萍,张保华,刘子亭.山东省聊城市耕层土壤有机碳储量动态研究[J].河南农业科学,2007,36(11):67-69.[ZHANG Jinping, ZHANG Baohua,LIU Ziting.Dynamic change of organic carbon storage in top soils in Liaocheng City of Shandong Province[J].Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences,2007,36(11):67-69.] [15]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:12-288.[LU Rukun.Methods for agricultural chemical analysis of soil[M].Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2000:12-288.] [16]STOOPS G.Guidelines for analysis and description of soil and regolith thin sections[M].Soil Science Society of America,Madison,2003. [17]中科院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室.土壤物理性质测定法[M].北京:科学出版社,1978:66-76.[Institute of Soil Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences.Methods of soil physics[M].Beijing:Science Press,1978:66-76.] [18]张保华,苑学亮,刘子亭,等.聊城市耕地地力监测点土壤有机碳含量变化研究[J].山东农业科学,2015,47(5):78-80.[ZHANG Baohua,YUAN Xueliang,LIU Ziting,et al.Study on soil organic matter content change of farmland productivity monitoring sites in Liaocheng City[J].Shandong Agricultural Sciences,2015,47(5):78-80.] [19]TISDALL J M,OADES J M.Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils[J].Journal of Soil Science,1982,33:141-163.
文章导航

/