地表过程研究

聚乳酸(PLA)沙障凹曲面及沉积物粒度特征研究 

展开
  • 中国林业科学研究院华北林业实验中心,北京 102300

    国际竹藤中心,北京 100102

    北京林业大学水土保持学院,水土保持国家林业局重点实验室,北京 100083 4 宁夏盐池毛乌素沙地生态系统国家定位观测研究站,宁夏 盐池 751500

王艺钊(1994-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为荒漠化防治.E-mail:yizhao_wang@163.com

收稿日期: 2019-08-23

  修回日期: 2019-12-13

  网络出版日期: 2020-05-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31500586);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(CAFYBB2016QB015);国家自然科学基金项目(31270749)资助

Concave surface features and grainsize characteristics in polylactic acid sand barrier

Expand
  • Forestry experiment Center of North China,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 102300,China;

    International Center for Bamboo and Rattan,Beijing 100102,China;

    School of Soil and Water Conservation,Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;Yanchi Ecology Research Station of the Mu Us Desert,Yanchi 751500,Ningxia,China

Received date: 2019-08-23

  Revised date: 2019-12-13

  Online published: 2020-05-25

摘要

在乌兰布和沙漠平坦沙地布设1 m×1 m 1.5 m×1.5 m2 m×2 m规格的聚乳酸(PLA)沙袋格状沙障,在风季后利用插钎法和激光衍射法分别测量障格内部凹曲面形态、测定表面0~3 cm沉积物粒度组成,分析不同规格沙障内部凹曲面形态特征、蚀积效应,计算平均粒径、标准偏差等粒度参数。结果表明:3种规格PLA沙障内部均能发育成稳定凹曲面,凹曲面深度随着规格的增大而逐渐增加,蚀积系数则逐渐减小,保持在1/12~1/10之间;障格内不同方位蚀积剖面曲线基本符合二次函数,但蚀积强度差异较大;1 m×1 m1.5 m×1.5 m规格沙障处于堆积状态,堆积强度分别是侵蚀强度的50.1倍和5.6倍,易发生沙埋;2 m×2 m 规格障内单位体积蚀积量为0.02 g·cm-3,接近蚀积平衡状态,有利于长期发挥沙障防护效益;各规格障内沉积物均以极细沙和细沙为主,除1 m×1 m规格外,PLA沙障的阻滞作用使得极细颗粒含量百分比迅速下降。综合考虑沙障铺设成本和防护效果,得出在平坦沙地或者弱风区域内适合布设2 m×2 m 规格PLA沙障,研究结果可为PLA沙障在防沙工程中的合理应用提供科学参考。

本文引用格式

王艺钊, 原伟杰, 丁国栋, 虞毅, 高广磊, 章尧想, 王陇 . 聚乳酸(PLA)沙障凹曲面及沉积物粒度特征研究 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2020 , 43(3) : 671 -678 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.03.13

Abstract

The features of concave surfaces,the effect of erosion and deposition,grain size parameters of sediment (including average particle size,standard deviation,skewness,and kurtosis) were analyzed separately in three polylactic acid(PLA) sand barriers with different specifications,1 m × 1 m,1.5 m × 1.5 m,and 2 m × 2 m,which were laid on the flat sand in Ulan Buh Desert,Inner Mongolia,China.The concave surfaces and sediment grain size characteristics of the surface layer (0-3 cm) were measured using graduated sticks and laser diffraction methods after the wind season.The results showed the three kinds of PLA sand barriers could form stable concave surfaces.Along with the growth of sand barrier specification,the depth of surfaces increased while the erosiondeposition coefficient decreased in the range of 1/12-1/10.The profiles in different directions basically fitted the quadratic curve;nevertheless,the intensities of erosion-deposition varied widely.The 1 m × 1 m and 1.5 m × 1.5 m sand barriers stayed in the deposition,of which deposition intensities were respectively 50.08,5.6 times the erosion intensities.The deposition intensities were 1.1 times the erosion intensities and the erosiondeposition volume per unit was 0.02 g·cm-3 in the 2 m × 2 m sand barriers.In terms of particle size and composition,we found that the sediment was mainly composed of very fine sand,and with the exception of the 1 m × 1 m specification,the retardation effect of PLA sand barriers resulted in a rapid decrease in the content of very fine sand.The height of the PLA sand barriers was 6-8 cm.The 1 m × 1 m and 1.5 m × 1.5 m sand barriers with large deposition intensities were prone to sand burial and required additional labor costs for re-laying.The 2 m × 2 m sand barriers,blocked to erosion and deposition balance,were beneficial to perform the long-term protective effect of sand barriers.Considering the cost and protection effect of sand barriers,it was concluded that the 2 m × 2 m PLA sand barriers were suitable for flat sand or weak wind condition,and provided a scientific reference for reasonable application in sediment control engineering.

参考文献

[1]孙保平.荒漠化防治工程学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000:144-202.[SUN Baoping.Desertification engineering[M].Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House,2000:144-202.] [2]常兆丰,仲生年,韩福桂,等.粘土沙障及麦草沙障合理间距的调查研究[J].中国沙漠,2000,20(4):455-457.[CHANG Zhaofeng,ZHONG Shengnian,HAN Fugui,et al.Research of the suitable row spacing on clay barriers and straw barriers[J].Journal of Desert Research,2000,20(4):455-457.] [3]虞毅.一种利用可生物降解材料制成的沙障及其配置方法[P].中国专利:CN101614005,2008-06-26.[YU Yi.A sand barrier made of biodegradable materials and its allocation method[P].Chinese Patent:CN101614005,2008-06-26.] [4]原伟杰.聚乳酸纤维沙袋沙障降解老化性能研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2014.[YUAN Weijie.Study on the degradation and aging performance of polylactic acid fibre sandbag sandbarrier[D].Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry,2014.] [5]蒙仲举,任晓萌,高永.低立式纤维沙袋沙障防风固沙效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(2):294-296.[MENG Zhongju,REN Xiaomeng,GAO Yong.Effect of the low-fiber sandbag sand-barrier on windbreaking and sand-fixation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(2):294-296.] [6]袁立敏,高永,汪季,等.沙袋沙障对流动沙丘地表风沙及植被恢复的影响[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(1):46-50.[YUAN Limin,GAO Yong,WANG Ji,et al.Impacts of sandbag barrier on sand flow and vegetation restoration on mobile dunes[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,34(1):46-50.] [7]虞毅.沙袋沙障防沙治沙技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:22-25.[YU Yi.Sandbag sandbarrier sand control technology[M].Beijing:Science Press,2014:22-25.] [8]原伟杰,虞毅,岳永德,等.沙丘部位对聚乳酸纤维沙袋沙障降解速度的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(4):166-171.[YUAN Weijie,YU Yi,YUE Yongde,et al.Effects of slope position on the degradation of PLA sand barriers[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2015,29(4):166-171.] [9]周丹丹,虞毅,胡生荣,等.沙袋沙障凹曲面特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(4):22-25.[ZHOU Dandan,YU Yi,HU Shengrong,et al.Concave surface characteristics of sandbag sand barrier[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,29(4):22-25.] [10]李锦荣,孙保平,高永,等.基于空气动力学的沙袋沙障气流场模拟[J].北京理工大学学报,2010,30(6):749-752.[LI Jinrong,SUN Baoping,GAO Yong,et al.Simulation of sand-bag barrier wind flow field based on aero dynamics[J].Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology,2010,30(6):749-752.] [11]党晓宏,虞毅,高永,等.PLA沙障对沙丘土壤粒径的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):16-19.[DANG Xiaohong,YU Yi,GAO Yong,et al.Analysis on impact of PLA barrier on soil particle sizes of sand dunes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(3):16-19.] [12]高永,丁延龙,汪季,等.不同植物灌丛沙丘表面沉积物粒度变化及其固沙能力[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(22):143-150.[GAO Yong,DING Yanlong,WANG Ji,et al.Sediments particle size changes and its sand fixation ability for different shrub dunes[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2017,33(22):143-150.] [13]钱广强,董治宝,罗万银,等.巴丹吉林沙漠地表沉积物粒度特征及区域差异[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1357-1364.[QIAN Guangqiang,DONG Zhibao,LUO Wanyin,et al.Grain size characteristics and spatial variation of surface sediment in the Badain Jaran Desert[J].Journal of Desert Research,2011,31(6):1357-1364.] [14]CATTLE S R,MCTAINSH G H,ELIAS S.Aeolian dust deposition rates,particlesizes and contributions to soils along a transect in semi-arid New South Wales,Australia[J].Sedimentology,2010,56(3):765-783. [15]周娜,张春来,田金鹭,等.半隐蔽式草方格沙障凹曲面形成的流场解析及沉积表征[J].地理研究,2014,33(11):2145-2156.[ZHOU Na,ZHANG Chunlai,TIAN Jinlu,et al.Flow field controlling the concave surface of the semi-buried checkerboards and its characterization by grain sizes of sediments[J].Geographical Research,2014,33(11):2145-2156.] [16]马学喜,李生宇,王海峰,等.固沙网沙障积沙凹曲面特征及其固沙效益分析[J].干旱区研究,2016,33(4):898-904.[MA Xuexi,LI Shengyu,WANG Haifeng,et al.Concave surface features in sand-fixing net barriers and evaluation of sand-fixing benefits[J].Arid Zone Research,2016,33(4):898-904.] [17]马学喜,王海峰,李生宇,等.两种固沙方格沙障的防护效益及地形适应性对比[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):344-349.[MA Xuexi,WANG Haifeng,LI Shengyu,et al.Comparison of sand-protecting effciency and terrain adapted of two checker board barriers[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,35(2):344-349. [18]高广磊,丁国栋,赵媛媛,等.四种粒径分级制度对土壤体积分形维数测定的影响[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2014,22(6):1060-1068.[GAO Guanglei,DING Guodong,ZHAO Yuanyuan,et al.Effects of soil particle size classification system on calculating volume-based fractal dimension[J].Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,2014,22(6):1060-1068.] [19]FOLK P L,WARD W D.Brazos river bar:A study in the significance of grain size parameters[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,1957,27(1):3-26. [20]屈建军,凌裕泉,俎瑞平,等.半隐蔽格状沙障的综合防护效益观测研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(3):329-335.[QU Jianjun,LING Yuquan,ZU Ruiping,et al.Study on comprehensive sand protecting efficiency of semi-buried checkerboard sandbarriers [J].Journal of Desert Research,2005,25(3):329-335.] [21]刘贤万.实验风沙物理与风沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,1995:11-14.[LIU Xianwan.Experimental aeolian physics and aeolian engineering[M].Beijing:Science Press,1995:11-14.] [22]吴正.风沙地貌与治沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003,35-38.[WU Zheng.Aeolian landforms and sand control engineering[M].Beijing:Science Press,2003:35-38.] [23]丁泊元,丁国栋,李炯书,等.沙袋沙障对沙地公路路域生态系统的影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2013,31(2):145-150.[DING Boyuan,DING Guodong,LI Jiongshu,et al.Effect of sandbag barrier on the ecosystem in highway in sandyland[J].Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University,2013,31(2):145-150.] [24]陈新闯,郭建英,董智,等.乌兰布和沙漠流动沙丘下风向降尘粒度特征[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(2):295-301.[CHEN Xinchuang,GUO Jianying,DONG Zhi,et al.Grain size characteristics of dustfall in the Ulan Buh Desert[J].Journal of Desert Research,2016,36(2):295-301.] [25]张登山,吴汪洋,田丽慧,等.青海湖沙地麦草方格沙障的蚀积效应与规格选取[J].地理科学,2014,34(5):627-634.[ZHANG Dengshan,WU Wangyang,TIAN Lihui,et al.Effects of erosion and deposition and dimensions selection of straw-checkerboard barriers in the desert of Qinghai Lake[J].Scientia Geographical Sinica,2014,34(5):627-634.] [26]丁延龙,高永,汪季,等.生物基可降解聚乳酸(PLA)沙障对沙丘表层沉积物粒度特征的影响[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(2): 262-269.[DING Yanlong,GAO Yong,WANG Ji,et al.Effects of biodegradable poly lactic acid sand barriers on surface sediment grain-size characteristics at sand dunes[J].Journal of Desert Research,2018,38(2):262-269.]
文章导航

/