区域发展

甘南藏区游牧民定居工程满意度研究——以夏河县为例

展开
  • (西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院,甘肃 兰州 730070)

雒占福(1975-),男,甘肃通渭人,副教授,博士,研究方向为城乡人居环境发展研究. E-mail:luozf200@163.com

收稿日期: 2018-11-19

  修回日期: 2019-02-20

  网络出版日期: 2019-05-21

Satisfaction degree of herdsmen settlement project in Southern Gansu Tibetan area:A case of Xiahe County

Expand
  •  (College of Geography and Environmental Science,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou 730070,Gansu,China)

Received date: 2018-11-19

  Revised date: 2019-02-20

  Online published: 2019-05-21

摘要

甘南藏区的游牧民定居工程既是减轻草场压力、恢复生态的重大生态工程,又是促进牧民脱离贫困、改善聚居环境的重大民生工程,其定居点满意度研究既具有城市与乡村人居环境研究的复合性特点,又具有特殊的地域性与民族性特点。在乡村振兴战略背景下,基于使用后评价视角,采用问卷调查法,运用模糊综合评价模型对夏河县游牧民定居点人居环境满意度进行评价研究,定量认识定居工程的良好表现及其存在的问题,对进一步优化生态定居工程策略具有重要的借鉴意义,结果表明:(1)夏河县牧民定居点人居环境满意度模糊综合评价结果为比较满意,各维度评价结果差异明显,呈现出“公共基础服务设施满意度>自然环境满意度>人文环境满意度>居住环境满意度”的递减特征。(2)夏河县定居牧民对定居点选址环境、空气质量与水草源配置的满意度较高,对定居工程未能解决草场退化问题与有悖于牧民崇山敬水的佛教环境伦理观的垃圾污染问题而对其不满意。(3)夏河县定居牧民对定居后的饮食结构与亲朋邻里感比较满意,对定居后多样化的家庭收入基本满意,而对定居环境的地方心理归属感及其与原有宗教信仰、生活习俗的融合不满意。(4)夏河县定居牧民对居住环境的房屋质量与朝向非常满意,对家庭宗教空间设置基本满意,对缺少个性化、地方化和乡村化的过于统一的色调风貌与不适应民族生活习惯的现代厨卫浴设置表现为不满意。(5)夏河县定居工程保障了定居牧民日常生活照明、供水、用能的水电供应条件,教育设施缩短了学龄孩子的就学距离而提高了入学率,公共活动场所增加了体育锻炼健身和传统习俗的发展空间,定居牧民对此支撑体系的大幅提升比较满意,而对成效因素复杂的地方政府提供的技术服务培训表现为不满意。(6)甘南藏区游牧民定居点满意度兼具乡村与城市人居环境满意度的复合性,对定居工程的不满意体现了游牧民对原有乡村人居环境的留恋与传统文化信仰的坚守,而对定居工程满意则体现了对城市人居环境建设的接受与认可。

本文引用格式

雒占福, 范圆圆, 杨哲, 张金, 朱立祥 . 甘南藏区游牧民定居工程满意度研究——以夏河县为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019 , 42(3) : 636 -644 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2019.03.20

Abstract

The nomadic settlement project in Southern Gansu Tibetan area,Gansu Province,China is not only a major ecological project to reduce the pressure and restore the ecology of the pasture,but also a major livelihood project to help the herdsmen to break away from poverty and to improve the inhabitation environment.The study of residentssatisfaction has a compound characteristic between urban and rural human settlements,and also has special regional and ethnic characteristics.Under the background of Rural Revitalization Strategy,based on the perspective of post occupancy evaluation,the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model was used to evaluate the satisfaction of the nomadic settlement project in Xiahe County with the questionnaire survey data in order to understand quantitatively the performance and the existing problems,and then to optimize strategy for the future nomadic settlement project.The results show as follows: (1) the results of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation on the satisfaction of the herdsmen living environment in Xiahe County are satisfactory,and the results of each dimension are obviously different,which showed a decline order list as follows:satisfaction about public infrastructure service facilities>satisfaction about natural environment>satisfaction about human environment>satisfaction about living environment. (2) The settled herdsman in Xiahe County have higher satisfaction with the air quality and the source of the water and grass of the settlement allocation,and have dissatisfaction with the problem of the degradation of the grassland and the garbage pollution against the Buddhist environmental ethics with reverence to  mountains and water. (3) The settled herdsman in Xiahe County are satisfied with the diet structure and family feeling,and the diversified family income,but not satisfied with the sense of local psychological attachment and the integration of the original religious beliefs and living customs. (4) The settled herdsmen in Xiahe County are very satisfied with the housing quality and orientation of the living environment,and are basically satisfied with the setting of the family religious space,but are dissatisfied with the modern kitchen and bathroom setting which are not adapted to national living habits,as well as the overunified color style which are lack of the personalization,localization and rural style. (5) The settled herdsmen in Xiahe County are very satisfied with the support system of the settlement project that supply the daily living lighting,water supply,educational facilities that shortens the school distance for schoolage children and increases the enrollment rate.The settled herdsmen are very satisfied with the space for physical exercise and for the development of traditional customs,but dissatisfied with the training of technical services provided by local governments with complex factors. (6) The satisfaction degree of nomadic settlement in Southern Gansu Tibetan area is a combination of the satisfaction degree of rural and urban human settlements.The dissatisfaction with the settlement project reflects nomadsnostalgia for the original rural human settlements and their adherence to traditional cultural beliefs,while the satisfaction with the settlement project reflects their acceptance and recognition of the construction of urban human settlements.

参考文献

[1]吴良镛.人居环境科学导论[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001:38.[WU Liangyong.Introduction to sciences of human settlements[M].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press,2001:38.] [2] UKOHA O M,BEAMISH J O.Assessment of residents[JP8]’[JP] satisfaction with public housing in Abuja,Nigeria[J].Habitat International,1997,21(4):445-460. [3] MOHIT M A,IBRAHIM M,YONG R R.Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public lowcost housing in Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia[J].Habitat International,2010,34(1):18-27.[JP] [4] AMOLE D.Residential satisfaction in students[JP8]’[JP] housing[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2009,29(1):76-85. [5] RIOUX L,WERNER C.Residential satisfaction among aging people living in place[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2011,31(2):158-169. [6] HAMERSMA M,TILLERMA T,SUSSMAN J,et al.Residential satisfaction close to highways:The impact of accessibility,nuisances and highway adjustment projects[J].Transportation Research Part A,2014,59(59):106-121. [7] 李伯华,刘传明,曾菊新.乡村人居环境的居民满意度评价及其优化策略研究——以石首市久合垸乡为例[J].人文地理,2009,24(1):28-32.[LI Bohua,LIU Chuanming,ZENG Juxin.An evaluation on the satisfaction degree and optimization strategy of rural human settlements:A case study of Jiuheyuan Town in Shishou City[J].Human Geography,2009,24(1):28-32.] [8] 曾灿,裴福旦.湘西地区传统村落人居环境调查及保护研究——以古丈县李家村为例[J].中外建筑,2017,23(9):107-112.[ZENG Can,PEI Fudan.Investigation and protection of human settlements in traditional villages in western Hunan Province:With Li Villages of Guzhang County as an example[J].Chinese and Overseas Architecture,2017,23(9):107-112.] [9] 杨兴柱,王群.皖南旅游区乡村人居环境质量评价及影响分析[J].地理学报,2013,68(6):851-867.[YANG Xingzhu,WANG qun.Evaluation of rural human settlement quality difference and its driving factors in tourism area of southern Anhui Province[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2013,68(6):851-867.] [10] 汪侠,甄峰,沈丽珍,等.基于贫困居民视角的旅游扶贫满意度评价[J].地理研究,2017,36(12):2355-2368.[WANG Xia,ZHEN Feng,SHEN Lizhen,et al.Evaluation of poor residents[JP8]’[JP] satisfaction with tourism poverty alleviation[J].Geographical Research,2017,36(12):2355-2368.] [11] 李俊峰,高凌宇,马作幸.跨江择居居民的居住满意度及影响因素——以南京市浦口区为例[J].地理研究,2017,36(12):2383-2392.[LI Junfeng,GAO Lingyu,MA Zuoxing.Residential satisfaction and its influencing factors of the residents choosing to live transYangtze River[J].Geographical Research,2017,36(12):2383-2392.] [12] 雷军,王建锋,段祖亮.基于城市地理学视角的社区居民满意度研究——以乌鲁木齐市为例[J].干旱区地理,2014,37(1):153-162.[LEI Jun,WANG Jianfeng,DUAN Zuliang.Community residengts[JP8]’[JP] satisfaction based on the perspective of urban geography:A case Urumqi City[J].Arid Land Geography,2014,37(1):153-162.] [13] 彭定萍,贺卫光.夏河游牧民定居社区适应性的现状研究——基于夏河牧区定居新村的实地调查[J].西北民族大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2009,31(1):57-62.[PENG Dingping,HE Weiguang.Studies on the current situation of Xiahe nomads[JP8]’[JP] adaptability of settlement in community:Based on the field study of Xiahe pastoral areas settlement in new community[J].Northwest University for National(Philosophy and Social Science),2009,31(1):57-62.] [14] 黄研.基于POE评价的移民安置区人居环境研究——以陕南移民搬迁为例[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2016,46(5):751-754.[HUANG Yan.The human settlement environment of resettlement area based on POE evaluation:Take the relocation in southern Shaanxi for example[J].Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2016,46(5):751-754.] [15] 马文参,徐增让.基于高分影像的牧区聚落演变及其影响因子——以西藏当曲流域为例[J].经济地理,2017,37(6):215-223.[MA Wencan,XU Zengrang.Settlements change and influencing factors in pastoral area based on highresolutioon remote sensing image:A case study of Dangqu Watershed in Tibet[J].Economic Geography,2017,37(6):215-223.] [16] 王炳煜,韩天虎,孙斌,等.基于3S技术的夏河县天然草原的载畜能力评价[J].中国草食动物科学,2010,30(5):46-48.[WANG Bingyu,HAN Tianhu,SUN Bin,et al.Evaluation of carrying capacity of natural grassland in Xiahe County based on 3S Technology[J].China Herbivores,2010,30(5):46-48.] [17] 赵雪雁,毛笑文.社会资本对农户生活满意度的影响——基于甘肃省的调查数据[J].干旱区地理,2015,38(5):1040-1048.[ZHAO Xueyan,MAO Xiaowen.Impact of social capital on the farmer[JP8]’[JP]s life satisfaction:Based on investigation data in Gansu Province[J].Arid Land Geography,2015,38(5):1040-1048.] [18] 王子侨,石育中,杨新军,等.外部社会资本视角下的黄土高原农户生活满意度研究——以陕西省长武县洪家镇为例[J].干旱区地理,2017,40(6):1317-1327.[WANG Ziqiao,SHI Yuzhong,YANG Xinjun,et al.Impact of social capital on the ryral households[JP8]’[JP] life satisfaction in the loess plateau: A case of Hongjia Town in Changwu County[J].Arid Land Geography,2017,40(6):1317-1327.] [19] 李志刚.中国城市“新移民”聚居区居住满意度研究——以北京、上海、广州为例[J].城市规划,2011,35(12):75-82.[LI Zhigang.A study of residential satisfaction in the NeoMigrant enclaves of Chinese cities:A case of Beijing,Shanghai and Guangzhou[J].City Planning Review,2011,35(12):75-82.] [20] 彭陟焱,叶健.藏传佛教中的藏族家庭神圣空间探析——以拉萨市当巴社区为例[J].西藏民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,36(3):27-33.[PENG Zhiyan,YE Jian.Analysis of sacred space of Tibetan household:Taking DanBag of Lhasa as an example[J].Journal of Xizang University for Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Science),2015,36(3):27-33.] [21] 王丽佳,刘兴元.牧民对草地生态补偿政策的满意度实证研究[J].生态学报,2017,37(17):5798-5806.[WANG Lijia,LIU Xingyuan.Satisfaction with grassland ecocompensation policies for herders:An empirical study on the Gansu pastoral area[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(17):5798-5806.]
文章导航

/