收藏 ｜ 设为首页 广告服务 ｜ 联系我们 ｜ 在线留言
高级检索

干旱区地理 >

2018 , Vol. 41 >Issue 4: 851 - 858

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2018.04.22

区域发展

基于改进当量的甘肃省耕地生态系统服务价值及其与区域经济发展的空间关系研究

展开
  • 1. 甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    2. 甘肃农业大学管理学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    3. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070
赵鸿雁,女,硕士研究生,主要从事农业生态学方面的研究.E-mail:glzlqw211117@126.com

收稿日期: 2018-01-12

  修回日期: 2018-04-23

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目（71563001）资助

收起

Ecosystem service value of cultivated land and its spatial relationship with regional economic development in Gansu Province based on improved equivalent

Expand
  • 1. College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China;
    2. College of Management, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China;
    3. College of Rangeland Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China

Received date: 2018-01-12

  Revised date: 2018-04-23

Fold

摘要

为量化分析耕地生态系统服务价值及其与区域经济发展的空间关系，采用改进的耕地当量因子，对甘肃省2014年耕地生态系统服务价值进行定量化研究，并采用双变量空间自相关探讨其与区域经济发展在空间上的关联关系。结果表明：（1）在GPP修正的基础上估算得到的甘肃省2014年耕地生态系统服务价值为4.96×1011元，其中水资源供给功能的价值为负，食物生产功能的生态系统服务价值相对较高，美学景观功能的生态系统服务价值最低。（2）双变量空间自相关显示人均国内生产总值与耕地生态系统服务价值在空间上存在显著的负相关关系，Moran’s I指数为-0.252 3。局部双变量空间自相关LISA图也显示低—高聚集区主要分布在经济发展相对落后、具有明显生态优势的东南部地区；而高—低聚集区则主要分布在经济高速发展，生态环境相对恶劣的西北部地区。研究结果可为甘肃省生态环境管护与区域经济发展提供决策参考，为实现经济增长与生态保护统筹协调发展提供参考依据。

关键词： 生态系统服务价值; 区域经济发展; 双变量空间自相关; 甘肃省

本文引用格式

赵鸿雁, 陈英, 杨洁, 裴婷婷 . 基于改进当量的甘肃省耕地生态系统服务价值及其与区域经济发展的空间关系研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018 , 41(4) : 851 -858 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2018.04.22

Abstract

Ecosystem service links the natural ecosystems and socioeconomic systems,and it is a hot topic in ecology,geography and other disciplines.The cultivated land ecosystem is closely related to the national food security,therefore,to quantify the ecosystem service value of cultivated land and analyze its relationship with regional economic development have great significance.This study uses an improved equivalent factor of cultivated land to quantify the ecosystem service value of cultivated land in Gansu Province,China,in 2014,and uses the method of spatial autocorrelation to explore the spatial relationship between the cultivated land ecosystem service value and regional economic development at the county scale.The results showed at follows:(1) As a supply land of the major food,the ecosystem service value of cultivated land of Gansu Province was 4.96×1011 yuan in 2014,and its food production function is relatively high,and the relatively backward economy has basically resulted in its relatively low aesthetic landscape function. (2) The univariate spatial autocorrelation indicated a significant positive correlation in space between its per capita GDP and the ecosystem service value of cultivated land in the areas with good regional economic development.The bivariate spatial autocorrelation indicated a significant negative correlation in space between its per capita GDP and the ecosystem service value of cultivated land.And the Moran'sI index is 0.510 6 and 0.604 1 respectively.The global Moran's I index is -0.252 3.The local bivariate spatial autocorrelation LISA map also shows that the Low-High areas were mainly distributed in the southeastern area where the economic development is relatively backward and there is obvious ecological advantages;however,the High-Low areas were basically the opposite.This research can provide decision-making reference for ecological environment management and protection and regional economic development of Gansu Province,and can also provide reference for the coordinated development of economic growth and ecological protection.

Key words： ecosystem service value (ESV); regional economic development; bivariate spatial autocorrelation; Gansu Province

参考文献

[1] 彭建,胡晓旭,赵明月,等.生态系统服务权衡研究进展:从认知到决策[J].地理学报,2017,72(6):960-973.[PENG Jian,HU Xiaoxu,ZHAO Mingyue,et al.Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs:From cognition to decision-making[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2017,72(6):960-973.]
[2] 傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446.[FU Bojie,ZHANG Liwei.Land-use change and ecosystem services:Concepts,methods and progress[J].Progress in Geography,2014,33(4):441-446.]
[3] 付意成,杜霞,彭文启,等.流域农业土地生态价值内涵及应用分析[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(8):243-250.[FU Yicheng,DU Xia,PENG Wenqi,et al.Agro-ecosystem value connotation based on watershed land use[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE),2015,31(8):243-250.]
[4] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment).Ecosystems and human well-being:Synthesis[M].Washington,DC:Island Press,2005.
[5] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.生态系统服务的供给、消费和价值化[J].资源科学,2008,30(1):93-99.[XIE Gaodi,ZHEN Lin,LU Chunxia,et al.Supply,consumption and valuation of ecosystem services in China[J].Resources Science,2008,30(1):93-99.]
[6] KADA R Yohei.Valuation of non-marketed agricultural ecosystem services,and food security in southeast Asia[M].Tokyo:Springer Japan,2014:111-121.
[7] 鲁的苗.基于能值分析的无锡市生态系统健康评价研究[D].南京:南京大学.2017.[LU Dimiao.The research of urban ecosystem health assessment in Wuxi City based on energy analysis[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University,2017.]
[8] 赵景柱,肖寒,吴刚.生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):290-292.[ZHAO Jingzhu,XIAO Han,WU Gang.Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystems services[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2000,11(2):290-292.]
[9] 李敏.基于InVEST模型的生态系统服务功能评价研究[D].北京:北京林业大学.2016.[LI Min.Ecosystem services evaluation based on Invest model:A case study of Yanqing,Beijing[D].Beijing:Beijing Forestry University,2016.]
[10] 杨圆圆,戴尔阜,付华.基于InVEST模型的生态系统服务功能价值评估研究框架[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,33(3):41-47.[YANG Yuanyuan,DAI Erfu,FU hua.The assessment framework of ecosystem service value based on InVEST model[J].Journal of Capital Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2012,33(3):41-47.]
[11] 王金伟.双鸭山市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2015.[WANG Jinwei.Research on land utilization to the value of the ecosystem services of the effect in Shuangyashan[D].Harbin:Northeast Agricultural University,2015.]
[12] 唐秀美,潘瑜春,程晋南,等.高标准基本农田建设对耕地生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(24):8009-8015.[TANG Xiumei,PAN Yuchun,CHENG Jinnan,et al.Impact of high-standard prime farmland construction on ecosystem service value in Beijing[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(24):8009-8015.]
[13] 李冬玉,任志远,刘宪锋,等.陕西省耕地生态系统服务价值动态测评[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(7):40-45.[LI Dongyu,REN Zhiyuan,LIU Xianfeng,et al.Dynamic change of ecological service value of cultivated land in Shaanxi Province[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2013,27(7):40-45.]
[14] 李广,黄高宝,王琦,等.陇东耕地净第一性生产力及生态服务价值的时空分异研究[J].草业学报,2011,20(6):18-25.[LI Guang,HUANG Gaobao,WANG Qi,et al.Spatial-temporal distribution of the ecological service value and NPP of cultivated land on Longdong Loess Plateau[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2011,20(6):18-25.]
[15] 陈彧.湖北省土地生态服务价值时空分异及驱动因素研究[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2015.[CHEN Yu.Study on spatial-temporal differentiation of land ecosystem service value and the driving factors in Hubei Province[D].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences,2015.]
[16] 高婧明.成都市耕地生态系统服务价值支付意愿及其影响因素研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2015.[GAO Jingming.The study of the payment willingness and influencing factor of plough eco-system service in Chendu[D].Chengdu:Sichuan Agricultural University,2015.]
[17] 刘世梁,安南南,王军.土地整理对生态系统服务影响的评价研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2014,22(9):1010-1019.[LIU Shiliang,AN Nannan,WANG Jun.Research progress on the effects of land consolidation on ecosystem services[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2014,22(9):1010-1019.]
[18] 张晓锁.基于生态系统服务理论的土地整理生态效益研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2009.[ZHNG Xiaosuo.Study on the eco-benefits of land consolidation upon the ESV theory[D].Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University,2009.]
[19] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,(8):1243-1254.[XIE Gaodi,ZHANG Caixia,ZHANG Leiming,et al.Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2015,(8):1243-1254.]
[20] YU Z Y,BI H.The key problems and future direction of ecosystem services research[J].Energy Procedia,2011,(5):64-68.
[21] YU Z Y,BI H.Status quo of research on ecosystem services value in China and suggestions to future research[J].Energy Procedia,2011,(5):1044-1048.
[22] SUN J.Research advances and trends in ecosystem services and evaluation in China[J].Procedia Environmental Sciences,2011,(10):1791-1796.
[23] COSTANZA R,GROOT R,SUTTON P,et al.Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J].Global Environmental Change,2014,(26):152-158.
[24] WANG W J,GUO H C,CHUAI X W,et al.The impact of land use change on the temporospatial variations of ecosystems services value in China and an optimized land use solution[J].Environmental Science & Policy,2014,44:62-72.
[25] CONSTANZA R,ARGE R,GROOT R,The Value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,386:253-260.
[26] 贺申泰.基于土地利用的生态服务价值估算及其与经济发展的关系[J].湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版),2012,30(4):462-465.[HE Shengtai.Interrelationship between economy index and ecological service value based on land use[J].Journal of Hubei University for Nationalities(Natural Science Edition),2012,30(4):462-465.]
[27] 刘会芳.苜蓿、小麦和玉米的经济效益分析——以甘肃省农户为例[D].兰州:兰州大学,2016.[LIU Huifang.The productive efficiency of alfalfa,wheat and maize:A case study of households in Gansu Province[D].Lanzhou:Lanzhou University,2016.]
[28] 董婷婷,王振颖,武玉峰.水浇地与旱地分类的研究进展[J].遥感信息,2010,(110):127-132.[DONG Tingting,WANG Zhenying,WU Yufeng.Progress in the research on classification of irrigated land and dry land[J].Remote Sensing Information,2010,(110):127-132.]
[29] 靳彦华,熊黑钢,张芳.水浇地与旱地春小麦冠层高光谱反射特征比较[J].国土资源遥感,2014,26(3):24-30.[JIN Yanhua,XIONG Heigang,ZHANG Fang.Comparative study of canopy spectral reflectance characteristics of spring wheat in irrigated land and dry land[J].Remote Sensing for Land and Resources,2014,26(3):24-30.]
[30] 曹宗龙.安徽省植被潜在生产力探究[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2011,30(2):77-83.[CAO Zonglong.On potential productivity of vegetation in Anhui Province[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2011,30(2):77-83.]
[31] 姚小薇,曾杰,李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):249-256.[YAO Xiaowei,ZENG Jie,LI Wangjun.Spatial correlation characteristics of urbanization and land ecosystem service value in Wuhan urban agglomeration[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2015,31(9):249-256.]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉