干旱区流域治理中的府际合作网络研究
收稿日期: 2024-05-08
修回日期: 2024-06-03
网络出版日期: 2025-02-25
基金资助
国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BZZ095)
Intergovernmental cooperation network in watershed management in arid regions
Received date: 2024-05-08
Revised date: 2024-06-03
Online published: 2025-02-25
随着跨域公共事务频现对于政府治理结构及其治理能力提出新的挑战,构建跨域府际合作逐渐成为流域治理等公共问题的必然选择。现有研究主要以湿润地区流域府际合作为研究对象,对干旱地区流域治理的研究较为匮乏。以新疆南疆地区喀什噶尔河流域治理中的府际合作网络为研究对象,运用社会网络分析方法,对流域2018—2022年5 a的阶段网络和整体网络进行研究,以廓清喀什噶尔河流域府际合作网络的演进逻辑、整体性特征和府际合作网络结构的底层逻辑。结果表明:(1) 喀什噶尔河流域治理已形成相对稳定的多主体府际合作网络。流域治理逐渐呈现多元协同的治理趋势,涉水部门间的合作不断加深,逐渐将生态环境局等相关部门纳入府际合作框架之中。(2) 喀什噶尔河流域治理呈现“核心-外围”式府际合作网络结构。流域治理仍以流域管理机构和水利部门为核心主体,通过横向辐射,带动多部门协同行动。(3) 纵向权力形塑喀什噶尔河流域府际合作结构。促进流域地方政府突破制度惰性和部门割裂,推动跨部门合作的有效执行。
艾比努尔·木拉提 , 赵丽江 . 干旱区流域治理中的府际合作网络研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2025 , 48(2) : 357 -366 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.284
The increasing prevalence of cross-domain public affairs presents new challenges to government structures and governance capacity. In this context, building cross-domain intergovernmental cooperation has become essential for addressing public issues like river basin governance. While existing research has mainly focused on intergovernmental cooperation in watersheds of humid areas, studies on watershed management in arid regions remain scarce. To address this gap, this study examines the cooperative network in river basin governance formed by the government and local governments of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China in the Kashgar River Basin. Using social network analysis, we explore the evolution, structure, and internal dynamics of this cooperative network, analyzing the forms, characteristics, and results of intergovernmental cooperation in river basin governance. Data was collected from the regulations and policies on Kashgar River Basin governance published by the official websites of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region government and local governments, focusing on intergovernmental cooperation documents for the social network analysis. The findings reveal the following: (1) The Kashgar River Basin governance has developed a stable, multi-agent intergovernmental cooperation network. River basin governance is increasingly characterized by multi-coordination, with deepening cooperation among water-related departments and the inclusion of ecological and other related departments. (2) The governance structure of the Kashgar River Basin follows a “core-periphery” model, where river basin management institutions and water conservancy departments hold core positions, driving multisectoral coordinated actions through horizontal collaboration. (3) Vertical power dynamics shape the intergovernmental cooperation structure, encouraging local governments in the basin to overcome institutional inertia and departmental silos, fostering effective cross-sectoral cooperation. This study offers valuable insights for optimizing intergovernmental governance structures in river basins and exploring ways to achieve regional win-win outcomes in river basin management in arid regions.
[1] | Youm J, Feiock R C. Interlocal collaboration and local climate protection[J]. Local Government Studies, 2019, 45(6): 777-802. |
[2] | 孙宇, 刘维忠, 盛洋. 基于PSR模型的新疆水资源经济生态韧性时空差异及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(12): 2017-2028. |
[Sun Yu, Liu Weizhong, Sheng Yang. Spatiotemporal differences and influencing factors of economic and ecological resilience of water resources in Xinjiang based on the PSR model[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(12): 2017-2028. ] | |
[3] | 刘慧, 孙思奥, 方创琳, 等. 1990—2020年新疆用水量时空演化格局及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(9): 1451-1461. |
[Liu Hui, Sun Si’ao, Fang Chuanglin, et al. Spatiotemporal evolutionary patterns and influencing factors of water use in Xinjiang from 1990 to 2020[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(9): 1451-1461. ] | |
[4] | 郭钰. 跨区域生态环境合作治理中利益整合机制研究[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(12): 159-164. |
[Guo Yu. A study on the integration mechanism of interest of across boundary cooperative governance of ecological environment[J]. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35(12): 159-164. ] | |
[5] | Hartley K. Environmental resilience and intergovernmental collaboration in the Pearl River Delta[J]. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2018, 34(4): 525-546. |
[6] | 邢华, 邢普耀. 强扭的瓜不一定不甜: 纵向干预在横向政府间合作过程中的作用[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2021(4): 84-94. |
[Xing Hua, Xing Puyao. Mandate is also effective: The role of hierarchical intervention in the process of interlocal collaboration[J]. Comparative Economic & Social Systems, 2021(4): 84-94. ] | |
[7] | 彭勃, 庞锐. 机制演进的分水岭: 流域污染治理中纵向压力如何推动横向协作?[J]. 行政论坛, 2022, 29(4): 38-47. |
[Peng Bo, Pang Rui. Watershed of mechanism evolution: How does hierarchical pressure promote horizontal collaboration in river basin pollution control?[J]. Administrative Tribune, 2022, 29(4): 38-47. ] | |
[8] | 朱德米, 李明. 基于交易成本视角的水污染防治政策分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2013(8): 41-44. |
[Zhu Demi, Li Ming. Water pollution prevention and control policy analysis: A transaction cost approach[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2013(8): 41-44. ] | |
[9] | 朱仁显, 李佩姿. 跨区流域生态补偿如何实现横向协同?——基于13个流域生态补偿案例的定性比较分析[J]. 公共行政评论, 2021, 14(1): 170-190. |
[Zhu Renxian, Li Peizi. How to achieve horizontal coordination of cross-regional river basin ecological compensation: A qualitative comparative analysis of 13 watershed ecological compensation cases[J]. Journal of Public Administration, 2021, 14(1): 170-190. ] | |
[10] | Moseley A, James O. Central state steering of local collaboration: Assessing the impact of tools of meta-governance in homelessness services in England[J]. Public Organization Review, 2008, 8(2): 117-136. |
[11] | Kurt T, Curtis W. Interlocal agreements as overlapping social networks: Picket-fence regionalism in metropolitan Kansas City[J]. Public Administration Review, 2012, 62(5): 585-598. |
[12] | 马捷, 锁利铭. 城市间环境治理合作: 行动、网络及其演变——基于长三角30个城市的府际协议数据分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019(9): 41-49. |
[Ma Jie, Suo Liming. Interlocal environmental collaboration: Action, network structure and evolution[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2019(9): 41-49. ] | |
[13] | 李洄旭, 母睿, 刘兰剑, 等. “结构-特征”二维视角下的府际环境合作网络研究——基于长三角城市群的经验数据[J]. 中国环境管理, 2023, 15(2): 119-129. |
[Li Weixu, Mu Rui, Liu Lanjian, et al. Research on the cooperation network of intergovernmental environmental governance from the perspective of “structure-characteristics”: Based on the intergovernmental agreements data of the Yangtze River urban agglomeration[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 15(2): 119-129. ] | |
[14] | Cui C, Yi H T. What drives the performance of collaboration networks: A qualitative comparative analysis of local water governance in China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(6): 1819, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061819. |
[15] | 颜海娜, 郭佩文, 曾栋. 跨部门协同治理的“第三条道路”何以可能——基于300个治水案例的社会网络分析[J]. 学术研究, 2021(10): 67-74. |
[Yan Haina, Guo Peiwen, Zeng Dong. How is the “third way” of inter-departmental collaborative governance possible: Social network analysis based on 300 water control cases[J]. Academic Research, 2021(10): 67-74. ] | |
[16] | 刘军. 社会网络分析导论[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2004. |
[Liu Jun. An introduction to social network analysis[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2004. ] | |
[17] | 孙涛, 温雪梅. 动态演化视角下区域环境治理的府际合作网络研究——以京津冀大气治理为例[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(5): 83-89. |
[Sun Tao, Wen Xuemei. Network analysis of regional environmental governance under inter-government cooperation: An example of the regional air governance in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2018(5): 83-89. ] | |
[18] | 约翰·斯科特. 社会网络分析法[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2007. |
[Scott John. Social network analysis[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2007. ] | |
[19] | 胡春艳, 周付军, 周新章. 河长制何以成功——基于C县的个案观察[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2020(3): 19-28. |
[Hu Chunyan, Zhou Fujun, Zhou Xinzhang. How did the system of river-leader succeed?: A case study based on C County’s system of river-leader[J]. Journal of Gansu Administration Institute, 2020(3): 19-28. ] |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |