收藏 ｜ 设为首页 广告服务 ｜ 联系我们 ｜ 在线留言
高级检索

干旱区地理 >

2025 , Vol. 48 >Issue 2: 190 - 201

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.190

气候与水文

区分由气候变化和人类活动引起的黄河流域水储量变化的不同组分

  • 姚笛 ,
  • 张子文 ,
  • 韩卫卫
展开
  • 1.濮阳职业技术学院，河南 濮阳 457000
    2.广州交通大学，广东 广州 510725
姚笛（1981-），男，副教授，主要从事卫星大地测量与地壳形变以及GNSS高精度数据处理与变形监测等方面的研究.
E-mail: 10011@pyvtc.edu.cn
韩卫卫（1979-），男，讲师，主要从事无人机测绘和建筑智能化工程技术等方面的研究. E-mail: 10012@pyvtc.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-03-23

  修回日期: 2024-07-24

  网络出版日期: 2025-02-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年基金(61974035);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2021A1515110638)

收起

Distinguishing climate- and human-driven water storage anomalies in the Yellow River Basin

  • YAO Di ,
  • ZHANG Ziwen ,
  • HAN Weiwei
Expand
  • 1. Puyang Vocational and Technical College, Puyang 457000, Henan, China
    2. Guangzhou Jiaotong University, Guangzhou 510725, Guangdong, China

Received date: 2024-03-23

  Revised date: 2024-07-24

  Online published: 2025-02-25

Fold

摘要

厘清流域气候变化和人类活动如何影响水储量变化有利于水资源精准管理和保护。以黄河流域为研究区，基于统计模型从降水量和气温中重建0.25°格网尺度气候变化驱动的水储量异常（Climate-driven water storage anomalies，CWSA）信息，并从GRACE重力卫星提供的陆地总水储量异常（Terrestrial water storage anomalies，TWSA）中分离出人类活动驱动的水储量异常（Human-driven water storage anomalies，HWSA）信息。结果表明：（1） 黄河流域CWSA整体呈显著上升趋势，流域平均上升速率为3.6 mm·a-1，其变化主要由流域内增加的降水量引起。（2） 黄河流域HWSA整体呈显著下降趋势，流域平均下降速率为8.9 mm·a-1，其中下降速率较大的区域集中在中下游地区，造成其下降的主要因素可能是人类活动中的地下水过度抽采。（3） TWSA分别与CWSA和HWSA的相关性分析表明黄河上游源区的TWSA主要受CWSA影响，而在广大中下游地区则受HWSA影响更大。研究通过量化的方式分离了气候变化和人类活动引起的流域水储量变化量，并区分了二者对黄河流域水储量变化的影响。

关键词： 气候变化; 人类活动; 水储量变化重建; 水储量变化分离

本文引用格式

姚笛 , 张子文 , 韩卫卫 . 区分由气候变化和人类活动引起的黄河流域水储量变化的不同组分[J]. 干旱区地理, 2025 , 48(2) : 190 -201 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.190

Abstract

Clarifying the impacts of climate change and human activities on water storage changes in a basin is essential for effective water resource management and protection. Using a statistical model, we reconstructed climate-driven water storage anomalies (CWSA) from precipitation and temperature data at a 0.25° grid scale in the Yellow River Basin, China and isolated human-driven water storage anomalies (HWSA) from terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWSA) derived from GRACE satellite data. The results reveal the following trends: (1) CWSA in the Yellow River Basin shows a significant upward trend, with an average increase of 3.6 mm·a-1, mainly due to increased rainfall. (2) HWSA in the basin shows a significant downward trend, with an average decrease of 8.9 mm·a-1, with higher decreases in the middle and lower reaches, likely driven by excessive groundwater extraction. (3) Correlation analysis indicates that TWSA in the upper Yellow River is primarily influenced by CWSA, while in the middle and lower reaches, it is mainly influenced by HWSA. This study separately quantifies the effects of climate change and human activities on water storage changes in the Yellow River Basin.

Key words： climate change; anthropogenic activities; water storage change reconstruction; water storage change separation

参考文献

[1] Latrubesse E M, Arima E Y, Dunne T, et al. Damming the rivers of the Amazon Basin[J]. Nature, 2017, 546(7658): 363-369.
[2] Liu B, Zou X, Yi S, et al. Identifying and separating climate- and human-driven water storage anomalies using GRACE satellite data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 263: 112559, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112559.
[3] Felfelani F, Wada Y, Longuevergne L. Natural and human-induced terrestrial water storage change: A global analysis using hydrological models and GRACE[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 553: 105-118.
[4] Huang Y, Salama M, Krol M, et al. Estimation of human-induced changes in terrestrial water storage through integration of GRACE satellite detection and hydrological modeling: A case study of the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(10): 8494-8516.
[5] 吕美霞, 马柱国, 李明星. 气候变化、植被改变及人类用水与黄河流域水循环的研究进展[J]. 大气科学学报, 2023, 46(6): 801-812.
  [Lü Meixia, Ma Zhuguo, Li Mingxing. A review on the changing water cycle of the Yellow River Basin under changes in climate, vegetation, and human water use[J]. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 2023, 46(6): 801-812. ]
[6] Reager J T, Thomas B F, Famiglietti J S. River basin flood potential inferred using GRACE gravity observations at several months lead time[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2014, 7(8): 588-592.
[7] MacDonald A, Bonsor H, Ahmed K, et al. Groundwater quality and depletion in the Indo-Gangetic Basin mapped from in situ observations[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2016, 9(10): 762-766.
[8] Syed T, Famiglietti J, Rodell M, et al. Analysis of terrestrial water storage changes from GRACE and GLDAS[J]. Water Resources Research, 2008, 44(2): W02433, doi: 10.1029/2006WR005779.
[9] Long D, Yang W, Scanlon B, et al. South-to-North Water Diversion stabilizing Beijing’s groundwater levels[J]. Nature Communication, 2020, 11(1): 3665, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17428-6.
[10] Pan Y, Zhang C, Gong H, et al. Detection of human-induced evapotranspiration using GRACE satellite observations in the Haihe River Basin of China[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017, 44(1): 190-199.
[11] Karesdotter E, Destouni G, Ghajarnia N, et al. Distinguishing direct human-driven effects on the global terrestrial water cycle[J]. Earths Future, 2022, 10(8): e2022EF002848, doi: 10.1029/2022EF002848.
[12] Scanlon B, Zhang Z, Save H. Global models underestimate large decadal declining and rising water storage trends relative to GRACE satellite data[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(6): 1080-1089.
[13] Humphrey V, Gudmundsson L. GRACE-REC: A reconstruction of climate-driven water storage changes over the last century[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2019, 11(3): 1153-1170.
[14] Humphrey V, Gudmundsson L, Seneviratne S I. Global reconstruction of climate-driven subdecadal water storage variability[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017, 44(5): 2300-2309.
[15] Qi W, Liu J, Chen D. Evaluations and improvements of GLDAS2.0 and GLDAS2.1 forcing data’s applicability for basin scale hydrological simulations in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2018, 123(23): 13128-13148.
[16] 成硕, 李艳忠, 星寅聪, 等. 遥感降水产品对黄河源区水文干旱特征的模拟性能分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(7): 1063-1072.
  [Cheng Shuo, Li Yanzhong, Xing Yincong, et al. Simulation performance of remote sensing precipitation products on hydrological drought characteristics in the source region of the Yellow River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(7): 1063-1072. ]
[17] 卓静, 胡皓, 何慧娟, 等. 陕北黄土高原生态脆弱性时空变异及驱动因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(11): 1768-1777.
  [Zhuo Jing, Hu Hao, He Huijuan, et al. Spatiotemporal variation and driving factors of ecological vulnerability in the Loess Plateau of northern Shaanxi[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(11): 1768-1777. ]
[18] 李海生. 黄河流域生态环境问题系统识别与展望[J]. 环境科学研究, 2024, 37(1): 1-10.
  [Li Haisheng. Systematic identification and prospect of eco-environmental problems in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2024, 37(1): 1-10. ]
[19] 张岚, 孙文科. 重力卫星 GRACE Mascon 产品的应用研究进展与展望[J]. 地球与行星物理论评, 2022, 53(1): 35-52.
  [Zhang Lan, Sun Wenke. Progress and prospect of GRACE Mascon product and its application[J]. Reviews of Geophysiscs and Planetary Physics, 2022, 53(1): 35-52. ]
[20] Zhang W X, Zhou T J, Wu P L. Anthropogenic amplification of precipitation variability over the past century[J]. Science, 2024, 385:427-432.
[21] Zhang W X, Furtado K, Wu P L, et al. Increasing precipitation variability on daily-to-multiyear time scales in a warmer world[J]. Science Advances, 2021, 7(31): eabf8021, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf8021.
[22] 韩双宝, 李甫成, 王赛, 等. 黄河流域地下水资源状况及其生态环境问题[J]. 中国地质, 2021, 48(4): 1001-1019.
  [Han Shuangbao, Li Fucheng, Wang Sai, et al. Groundwater resource and eco-environmental problem of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Geology of China, 2021, 48(4): 1001-1019. ]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉