收藏 ｜ 设为首页 广告服务 ｜ 联系我们 ｜ 在线留言
高级检索

干旱区地理 >

2023 , Vol. 46 >Issue 4: 636 - 648

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.224

区域发展

中国西部省会城市新型城镇化发展水平演化研究

  • 邹亚锋 ,
  • 张倩 ,
  • 饶钰飞 ,
  • 邓敏 ,
  • 王淇
展开
  • 1.福州大学环境与安全工程学院，福建 福州 350158
    2.内蒙古大学公共管理学院，内蒙古 呼和浩特 010021
    3.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所，北京 100101
    4.北京师范大学地理科学学部，北京 100875
邹亚锋（1984-），男，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，主要从事国土空间规划与土地可持续利用等方面的研究. E-mail: zouyafeng2003@sina.com

收稿日期: 2022-05-16

  修回日期: 2022-08-15

  网络出版日期: 2023-04-28

基金资助

内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2020MS04016);福州大学人才引进项目(XRC-22026);教育部人文社科一般项目青年基金(21YJC840028)

收起

Evolution of new urbanization of provincial capitals in western China

  • Yafeng ZOU ,
  • Qian ZHANG ,
  • Yufei RAO ,
  • Min DEND ,
  • Qi WANG
Expand
  • 1. College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350158, Fujian, China
    2. College of Public Administration, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, Inner Mongolia, China
    3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    4. Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received date: 2022-05-16

  Revised date: 2022-08-15

  Online published: 2023-04-28

Fold

摘要

新型城镇化是以城乡统筹、城乡一体、产业互动、节约集约、生态宜居、和谐发展为基本特征的城镇化，主要表现在人口、经济、土地、社会和生态等方面。为揭示中国西部省会城市新型城镇化发展水平，从人口城镇化、经济城镇化、土地城镇化、社会城镇化、生态城镇化5个方面构建中国西部省会城市新型城镇化综合测评指标体系，利用熵值法和加权求和法计算各市2005—2019年新型城镇化综合得分、各因素层得分，并结合Q型聚类分析法及偏相关分析法对中国西部省会城市新型城镇化的综合水平、单项水平以及单项水平相关性进行分析。结果表明：（1）各市15 a间新型城镇化发展水平各异，区内及区际差异大。（2）各市人才吸引力较弱，经济及社会发展不均衡，城市建设力度大，生态文明建设有待提升。（3）仅经济-生态实现了协调发展，且土地城镇化快于人口城镇化。研究结果为中国西部地区新型城镇化发展提供决策支持。

关键词： 新型城镇化; 熵值法; 质量评价; 中国西部省会城市

本文引用格式

邹亚锋 , 张倩 , 饶钰飞 , 邓敏 , 王淇 . 中国西部省会城市新型城镇化发展水平演化研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023 , 46(4) : 636 -648 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.224

Abstract

New urbanization includes the basic characteristics of urban-rural coordination, urban-rural integration, industrial interaction, conservation and intensiveness, ecological livability, and harmonious development. It is mainly manifested in terms of population, economy, land, society, and ecology. This study constructed a comprehensive evaluation index system from five factors, i.e., population urbanization, economic urbanization, land urbanization, social urbanization, and ecological civilization, to reveal the quality of new urbanization in provincial capitals of western China and determine its development trend. For this, the comprehensive scores of new urbanization of provincial capitals in western China and the scores of each factor layer in each city from 2005 to 2019 were calculated by means of entropy and weighted summation method. The Q-type cluster analysis method and partial correlation analysis method were used to calculate the comprehensive level, single item level, and single item level correlation of new urbanization in provincial capitals of western China. The analyses revealed the following results: (1) New urbanization in different cities has different and unstable development levels, and the construction of new urbanization is still in the exploratory stage. The development imbalance within and among the three regions is prominent; the cities’ comprehensive scores of new urbanization in the northwest region are far behind the southwest region and the middle reaches of the Yellow River. (2) Provincial capitals of western China have a weak attraction for talents. The economic level and social development show great differences, indicating that the quality of life of the residents needs to be improved. (3) Economy and ecology have achieved coordinated development; however, other single urbanization factors exhibit imbalances. Cities should use land more economically and intensively since land urbanization is faster than population urbanization. Based on the above conclusions, related recommendations are also presented. The findings of this study can contribute to the development of new urbanization in western China.

Key words： new urbanization; entropy method; quality evaluation; provincial capitals of western China

参考文献

[1] Wei C, Wang Z Q, Lan X, et al. The spatial-temporal characteristics and dilemmas of sustainable urbanization in China: A new perspective based on the concept of Five-in-One[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(12): 1-28.
[2] Cai Z Y, Liu Z X, Zuo S M, et al. Finding a peaceful road to urbanization in China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 83: 560-563.
[3] Guan X L, Wei H K, Lu S S, et al. Assessment on the urbanization strategy in China: Achievements, challenges and reflections[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 71: 97-109.
[4] Chen M X, Liu W D, Lu D D, et al. Progress of China’s new-type urbanization construction since 2014: A preliminary assessment[J]. Cities, 2018, 78: 180-193.
[5] Li Y H, Jia L R, Wu W H, et al. Urbanization for rural sustainability-rethinking China’s urbanization strategy[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 178: 580-586.
[6] Gu C L, Wu L, Cook L. Progress in research on Chinese urbanization[J]. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2012, 1(2): 101-149.
[7] 许皓, 李百浩. Urbanization在中国——从都市化到新型城镇化[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43(2): 22-28.
[7] [Xu Hao, Li Baihao, Urbanization in China: A study from the perspective of conceptual history[J]. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(2): 22-28.]
[8] 田雪原. 城镇化还是城市化[J]. 人口学刊, 2013, 35(6): 5-10.
[8] [Tian Xueyuan. What is the connotation of urbanization in China?[J]. Population Journal, 2013, 35(6): 5-10.]
[9] 李智, 张小林. 中国地理学对乡村发展的多元视角研究及思考[J]. 人文地理, 2017, 32(5): 1-8.
[9] [Li Zhi, Zhang Xiaolin. Pluralistic perspectives and thinking of Chinese rural development in geography study[J]. Human Geography, 2017, 32(5): 1-8.]
[10] 姚士谋, 张平宇, 余成, 等. 中国新型城镇化理论与实践问题[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(6): 641-647.
[10] [Yao Shimou, Zhang Pingyu, Yu Cheng, et al. The theory and practice of new urbanization in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(6): 641-647.]
[11] 董晓峰, 杨春志, 刘星光. 中国新型城镇化理论探讨[J]. 城市发展研究, 2017, 24(1): 26-34.
[11] [Dong Xiaofeng, Yang Chunzhi, Liu Xingguang. The exploration of China new urbanization theory[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2017, 24(1): 26-34.]
[12] Wang X R, Hui E C-M, Choguill C, et al. The new urbanization policy in China: Which way forward?[J]. Habitat International, 2015, 47: 279-284.
[13] Chen M X, Liu W D, Lu D D. Challenges and the way forward in China’s new-type urbanization[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 55: 334-339.
[14] 叶爱山, 夏海力. 新型城镇化对工业产能利用率的影响效应[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(6): 118-121.
[14] [Ye Aishan, Xia Haili. The effect of new urbanization on the utilization rate of industrial capacity[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2021, 37(6): 118-121.]
[15] Zhao J J, Wang M Y. A novel assessment of urbanization quality and its applications[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 508: 141-154.
[16] Zhang W J, Wang M Y. Spatial-temporal characteristics and determinants of land urbanization quality in China: Evidence from 285 prefecture-level cities[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 38: 70-79.
[17] Yang W P, Lu X L. An assessment of China’s new urbanization level-based on the vertical and horizontal levels of the grade method[J]. Economic Horizons, 2016, 18(3): 199-211.
[18] 邹亚锋, 李亚静, 袁志鸿. 西部省会城市新型城镇化水平综合测度研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(6): 1612-1621.
[18] [Zou Yafeng, Li Yajing, Yuan Zhihong. Comprehensive research on new urbanization level of provincial capital cities in western China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(6): 1612-1621.]
[19] 南瑞江, 李雪涛, 陈迪芳. 新型城镇化协调发展测度及其空间格局——以东北三省为例[J]. 东北农业科学, 2020, 45(4): 90-94.
[19] [Nan Ruijiang, Li Xuetao, Chen Difang. Measure of coordinated development of new urbanization and its spatial pattern: Taking the three northeastern provinces as an example[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 45(4): 90-94.]
[20] 牟玲玲, 尹赛. 基于社会网络分析的京津冀新型城镇化发展水平研究——以新沂市为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2019(6): 95-101.
[20] [Mu Lingling, Yin Sai. Research on new-type urbanization development level of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei based on social network analysis[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2019(6): 95-101.]
[21] 蒋正云, 胡艳. 中国新型城镇化高质量发展时空格局及异质性演化分析[J]. 城市问题, 2021(3): 4-16.
[21] [Jiang Zhengyun, Hu Yan. Analysis on the spatiotemporal pattern and heterogeneous evolution of high-quality development of new urbanization in China[J]. Urban Problems, 2021(3): 4-16.]
[22] 李刚. 基于DEA的地级市新型城镇化效率差异化研究——以河南省为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(2): 109-115.
[22] [Li Gang. Study on the efficiency differentiation of new urbanization in prefecture level cities based on DEA: A case study in Henan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(2): 109-115.]
[23] 黄茂兴, 张建威. 生态文明建设与新型城镇化协调发展的时空格局及影响因素——以福建省为例[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(1): 40-54, 169-170.
[23] [Huang Maoxing, Zhang Jianwei. Spatio-temporal pattern and influencing factors of coordinated development of ecological civilization construction and new urbanization: Taking Fujian as an example[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021(1): 40-54, 169-170.]
[24] 杨佩卿. 新发展理念下新型城镇化发展水平评价——以西部地区为例[J]. 当代经济科学, 2019, 41(3): 92-102.
[24] [Yang Peiqing. Evaluation of new-style urbanization development level from the view of new development concept: Take western China as an example[J]. Modern Economic Science, 2019, 41(3): 92-102.]
[25] 惠调艳, 郭筱. 西部地区经济-资源-环境协调发展水平测度[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(11): 124-128.
[25] [Hui Tiaoyan, Guo Xiao. The measurement of the coordinated development level of economy-resources-environment in western regions[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2019, 35(11): 124-128.]
[26] 杨骞, 刘华军. 污染排放约束下中国农业水资源效率的区域差异与影响因素[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2015, 32(1): 114-128, 158.
[26] [Yang Qian, Liu Huajun. Regional disparity and influencing factors of agricultural water resources efficiency with the constraint of pollution[J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2015, 32(1): 114-128, 158.]
[27] 孔阳, 何伟军, 覃朝晖, 等. 中国西部大开发政策净效应评估[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(24): 91-95.
[27] [Kong Yang, He Weijun, Qin Zhaohui, et al. Net effect evaluation on China’s western development policy[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2018, 34(24): 91-95.]
[28] 袁媛, 伍彬, 古叶恒. 重庆市城市贫困空间特征和影响因素研究——兼论东西部城市的异同[J]. 人文地理, 2015, 30(1): 70-77.
[28] [Wu Bin, Gu Yeheng. Spatial pattern and driving forces of urban poverty of Chongqing City: Discussion on similarities and differences between eastern and western cities in China[J]. Human Geography, 2015, 30(1): 70-77.]
[29] 李豫新, 郑李昂. 西部省份经济增长效率及影响因素研究——基于SFA模型的实证分析[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(3): 57-62.
[29] [Li Yuxin, Zheng Li’ang. Study on economic growth efficiency and influencing factors in western provinces: An empirical analysis based on SFA model[J]. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35(3): 57-62.]
[30] 张军民, 荣城, 马玉香. 新疆城镇化绿色发展时空分异及驱动因子探究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(1): 251-262.
[30] [Zhang Junmin, Rong Cheng, Ma Yuxiang. Spatial and temporal differences and driving factors of the green development of urbanization in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(1): 251-262.]
[31] 刘浩, 刘树霖. 高质量发展框架下新型城镇化发展质量测度[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(13): 112-116.
[31] [Liu Hao, Liu Shulin. Quality measurement of new urbanization development under the framework of high-quality development[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2021, 37(13): 112-116.]
[32] 杨群叶, 梁彦庆, 黄志英, 等. 中国城市空气质量与土地集约利用的匹配关系及影响因素[J]. 科技导报, 2022, 40(7): 54-64.
[32] [Yang Qunye, Liang Yanqing, Huang Zhiying, et al. Matching relationship and influencing factors between urban air quality and land intensive use in Chinese cities[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022, 40(7): 54-64.]
[33] 徐维祥, 徐志雄, 刘程军. 黄河流域地级城市土地集约利用效率与生态福利绩效的耦合性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 114-130.
[33] [Xu Weiyang, Xu Zhixiong, Liu Chengjun. Coupling analysis of land intensive use efficiency and ecological well-being performance of cities in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(1): 114-130.]
[34] 宁雷, 连华, 牛月, 等. 城镇发展的收缩状态识别、分类及因素探讨——以黄河流域甘肃段为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(3): 492-504.
[34] [Ning Lei, Lian Hua, Niu Yue, et al. Identification, classification and factors of contraction of urban development: Take the Gansu section of Yellow River Basin as an example[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 492-504.
[35] 汤国安, 宋佳. 基于DEM坡度图制图中坡度分级方法的比较研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(2): 157-160, 192.
[35] [Tang Guo’an, Song Jia. Comparison of slope classification methods in slope mapping from DEMs[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(2): 157-160, 192.]
[36] 宫同伟, 运迎霞. 基于因子分析和聚类分析的城市轨交站区功能识别方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(5): 177-180.
[36] [Gong Tongwei, Yun Yingxia. Function identification method of urban rail transit station area based on factor analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2020, 36(5): 177-180.]
[37] 范辉, 刘卫东, 吴泽斌, 等. 浙江省人口城市化与土地城市化的耦合协调关系评价[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(12): 21-28.
[37] [Fan Hui, Liu Weidong, Wu Zebin, et al. The coupling coordination evaluation between population urbanization and land urbanization in Zhejiang Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(12): 21-28.]
[38] Taylor J R. The China dream is an urban dream: Assessing the CPC’s national new-type urbanization plan[J]. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 2015, 20(2): 107-120.
[39] Griffiths M, Schiavone M. China’s new urbanisation plan 2014—2020[J]. China Report, 2016, 52(2): 73-91.
[40] Li H F, De Jong M. Citizen participation in China’s eco-city development. Will ‘new-type urbanization’ generate a breakthrough in realizing it?[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 162: 1085-1094.
[41] Bai Y P, Deng X Z, Jiang S J, et al. Exploring the relationship between urbanization and urban eco-efficiency: Evidence from prefecture-level cities in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 195: 1487-1496.
[42] Chen M X, Gong Y H, Lu D D, et al. Build a people-oriented urbanization: China’s new-type urbanization dream and Anhui model[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 80: 1-9.
[43] Zhao Z, Bai Y P, Wang G F, et al. Land eco-efficiency for new-type urbanization in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 137: 19-26.
[44] 单卓然, 黄亚平. “新型城镇化”概念内涵、目标内容、规划策略及认知误区解析[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2013(2): 16-22.
[44] [Shan Zhuoran, Huang Yaping. An analysis of the concept, goals, contents, planning strategies and misunderstandings of new urbanization[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2013(2): 16-22.]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉