收藏 ｜ 设为首页 广告服务 ｜ 联系我们 ｜ 在线留言
高级检索

干旱区地理 >

2023 , Vol. 46 >Issue 3: 471 - 480

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.337

区域发展

疏勒河流域生态系统服务供需空间匹配特征

  • 周凡 ,
  • 周冬梅 ,
  • 金银丽 ,
  • 马静 ,
  • 杨静 ,
  • 朱小燕 ,
  • 张军
展开
  • 1.甘肃农业大学管理学院，甘肃 兰州 730070
    2.甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院，甘肃 兰州 730070
    3.甘肃省节水农业工程技术研究中心，甘肃 兰州 730070
    4.干旱生境作物学国家重点实验室，甘肃 兰州 730070
周凡（1996-），女，硕士研究生，主要从事生态系统服务方面的研究. E-mail: 1993680289@qq.com

收稿日期: 2022-07-06

  修回日期: 2022-08-02

  网络出版日期: 2023-03-31

基金资助

甘肃省高等学校创新基金(2021A-061);甘肃省自然科学基金(21JR7RA811);甘肃省林业和草原科技创新计划(LCKJCX202- 205)

收起

Spatial matching characteristics of supply and demand of ecosystem services in the Shule River Basin

  • Fan ZHOU ,
  • Dongmei ZHOU ,
  • Yinli JIN ,
  • Jing MA ,
  • Jing YANG ,
  • Xiaoyan ZHU ,
  • Jun ZHANG
Expand
  • 1. College of Management, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    2. College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    3. Research Center for Water-Saving Agriculture in Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    4. State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China

Received date: 2022-07-06

  Revised date: 2022-08-02

  Online published: 2023-03-31

Fold

摘要

生态系统服务与人类可持续发展紧密相连，研究区域生态系统服务供需特征，了解其空间匹配状况是实现生态资源有效配置和推动区域生态安全的重要前提。基于多源数据，在InVEST模型、ArcGIS和GeoDA软件的支撑下，分析疏勒河流域产水服务、固碳服务、食物服务供需特征和空间匹配状况。结果表明：（1） 除产水服务外，疏勒河流域其他各项生态系统服务供给均大于需求，但不同区域和生态系统服务间存在差异。（2） 疏勒河流域综合服务供需比为0.063，不同生态系统服务的供需比由高到低依此为：固碳服务（0.1854）、食物服务（0.0078）和产水服务（-0.0043）。（3） 产水服务和固碳服务空间匹配类型都主要以低高型空间错位和高低型空间错位为主，食物服务空间匹配类型主要以低低型空间匹配为主，其中产水服务的空间匹配错位现象最严重。

关键词： 生态系统服务; 供需关系; 空间匹配; 疏勒河流域

本文引用格式

周凡 , 周冬梅 , 金银丽 , 马静 , 杨静 , 朱小燕 , 张军 . 疏勒河流域生态系统服务供需空间匹配特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023 , 46(3) : 471 -480 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.337

Abstract

Ecosystem services are closely linked to sustainable human development. Studying the supply and demand characteristics of regional ecosystem services and comprehending their spatial matching status are essential prerequisites for achieving the efficient allocation of ecological resources and promoting regional ecological security. The water production, carbon sequestration, and food services of the Shule River Basin in the Gansu Province of China were all examined on the basis of multisource data and with the assistance of the InVEST model as well as the ArcGIS and GeoDA software. The following are the results of this study: (1) There are discrepancies between different regions and ecosystem services; except for water production services, the supply of other ecosystem services in the Shule River Basin is more than the demand. (2) The supply-demand ratio of comprehensive services in the Shule River Basin is 0.063, and the supply-demand ratios of different ecosystem services are carbon sequestration services (0.1854)>food services (0.0078)>water production services (-0.0043). (3) Water production and carbon sequestration service spaces are mainly based on low-high-type and high-low-type spatial dislocation, respectively, whereas food service spaces are primarily based on low-low-type spatial matching, among which the spatial mismatch of water production services is the most severe.

Key words： ecosystem services; relationship between supply and demand; spatial matching; Shule River Basin

参考文献

[1] 巩杰, 柳冬青, 高秉丽, 等. 西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系——以甘肃白龙江流域为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4): 1278-1288.
[1] [ Gong Jie, Liu Dongqing, Gao Bingli, et al. Tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in western mountainous China: A case study of the Bailongjiang watershed in Gansu, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(4): 1278-1288. ]
[2] 赵晓冏, 苏军德, 王建, 等. 甘肃省生态服务供需关系及影响因子研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(10): 4926-4941.
[2] [ Zhao Xiaojiong, Su Junde, Wang Jian, et al. A study on the relationship between supply-demand relationship of ecosystem services and impact factors in Gansu Province[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(10): 4926-4941. ]
[3] Costanza R, Groot R D, Braat L, et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 28: 1-16.
[4] Zhai T L, Wang J, Jin Z F, et al. Did improvements of ecosystem services supply-demand imbalance change environmental spatial injustices?[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 111(C): 106068, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106068.
[5] 翟天林, 王静, 金志丰, 等. 长江经济带生态系统服务供需格局变化与关联性分析[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(15): 5414-5424.
[5] [ Zhai Tianlin, Wang Jing, Jin Zhifeng, et al. Change and correlation analysis of the supply-demand pattern of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(15): 5414-5424. ]
[6] 陈骏宇, 王慧敏, 刘钢, 等. “水-能-粮”视角下杭嘉湖区域生态系统服务供需测度及政策研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(3): 542-553.
[6] [ Chen Junyu, Wang Huimin, Liu Gang, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem services and its adaptive policies in the Hangjiahu region under water-energy-food nexus[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(3): 542-553. ]
[7] Vigl L E, Depellegrin D, Pereira P, et al. Mapping the ecosystem service delivery chain: Capacity, flow, and demand pertaining to aesthetic experiences in mountain landscapes[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 574: 422-436.
[8] 杨丽雯, 董丽青, 张立伟, 等. 固碳服务供需平衡和服务流量化评估——以引黄入晋南干线为例[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(3): 557-571.
[8] [ Yang Liwen, Dong Liqing, Zhang Liwei, et al. Quantitative assessment of carbon sequestration servic supply and demand and service flows: A case study of the Yellow River diversion project south line[J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(3): 557-571. ]
[9] 刘晶晶, 王静, 戴建旺, 等. 黄河流域县域尺度生态系统服务供给和需求核算及时空变异[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 148-161.
[9] [ Liu Jingjing, Wang Jing, Dai Jianwang, et al. The relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services and its spatio-temporal variation in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(1): 148-161. ]
[10] 张平, 朱翔, 贺清云, 等. 长江经济带生态系统服务供需时空分异与平衡格局分析[J]. 生态科学, 2020, 39(6): 155-166.
[10] [ Zhang Ping, Zhu Xiang, He Qingyun, et al. Analysis on the spatial-temporal differentiation and supply-demand balance pattern of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Zone[J]. Ecological Science, 2020, 39(6): 155-166. ]
[11] Talukdar S, Singha P, Shahfahad, et al. Dynamics of ecosystem services (ESs) in response to land use land cover (LU/LC) changes in the lower Gangetic Plain of India[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 112(C): 106121, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106121
[12] Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F, et al. Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services: A concept for land-cover based assessments[J]. Landscape Online, 2009, 15: 1-22.
[13] 胡忠秀, 周忠学. 西安市绿地生态系统服务功能测算及其空间格局研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(3): 553-561.
[13] [ Hu Zhongxiu, Zhou Zhongxue. Ecosystem services evaluation and its spatial pattern analysis of urban green land in Xi’an City[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2013, 36(3): 553-561. ]
[14] Costanza R, Ralph A, Groot R D, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
[15] Wolff S, Schulp C J E, Kastner T, et al. Quantifying spatial variation in ecosystem services demand: A global mapping approach[J]. Ecological Economics, 2017, 136: 14-29.
[16] Ala-Hulkko T, Kotavaara O, Alahuhta J, et al. Mapping supply and demand of a provisioning ecosystem service across Europe[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 103: 520-529.
[17] Schirpke U, Candiago S, Vigl L E, et al. Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 651: 928-941.
[18] 马琳, 刘浩, 彭建, 等. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1277-1289.
[18] [ Ma Lin, Liu Hao, Peng Jian, et al. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(7): 1277-1289. ]
[19] 刘慧敏, 范玉龙, 丁圣彦. 生态系统服务流定量化研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(7): 2161-2171.
[19] [ Liu Huimin, Fan Yulong, Ding Shengyan. Progress of quantitative analysis of ecosystem service flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(7): 2161-2171. ]
[20] 申嘉澍, 李双成, 梁泽, 等. 生态系统服务供需关系研究进展与趋势展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(8): 1909-1922.
[20] [ Shen Jiashu, Li Shuangcheng, Liang Ze, et al. Research progress and prospect for the relationships between ecosystem services supplies and demands[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(8): 1909-1922. ]
[21] 刘立程, 刘春芳, 王川, 等. 黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究——以兰州市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937.
[21] [ Liu Licheng, Liu Chunfang, Wang Chuan, et al. Supply and demand matching of ecosystem services in loess hilly region: A case study of Lanzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(9): 1921-1937. ]
[22] Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets[J]. Ecological lndicator, 2012, 21: 17-29.
[23] 赵雪雁, 马平易, 李文青, 等. 黄土高原生态系统服务供需关系的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(11): 2780-2796.
[23] [ Zhao Xueyan, Ma Pingyi, Li Wenqing, et al. Spatiotemporal changes of supply and demand relationships of ecosystem services in the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(11): 2780-2796. ]
[24] 胡其玉, 陈松林. 基于生态系统服务供需的厦漳泉地区生态网络空间优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 342-355.
[24] [ Hu Qiyu, Chen Songlin. Optimizing the ecological networks based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services in Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou region[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(2): 342-355. ]
[25] 岳东霞, 李晨, 周妍妍, 等. 疏勒河流域夏季土壤含水量时空变化[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 58(2): 179-185.
[25] [ Yue Dongxia, Li Chen, Zhou Yanyan, et al. Spatiotemporal changes in soil water content in the Shule River Basin in summer[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(2): 179-185. ]
[26] 周妍妍, 朱敏翔, 郭晓娟, 等. 疏勒河流域气候变化和人类活动对植被NPP的相对影响评价[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(14): 5127-5137.
[26] [ Zhou Yanyan, Zhu Minxiang, Guo Xiaojuan, et al. Relative effects of climate change and human activities on net primary productivity in Shule River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(14): 5127-5137. ]
[27] 孙丽蓉, 周冬梅, 岑国璋, 等. 基于地理探测器模型的疏勒河流域景观生态风险评价及驱动因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(5): 1384-1395.
[27] [ Sun Lirong, Zhou Dongmei, Cen Guozhang, et al. Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factors of the Shule River Basin based on the geographic detector model[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(5): 1384-1395. ]
[28] 周彬, 余新晓, 陈丽华, 等. 基于InVEST模型的北京山区土壤侵蚀模拟[J]. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(6): 9-13, 19.
[28] [ Zhou Bin, Yu Xinxiao, Chen Lihua, et al. Soil erosion simulation in mountain areas of Beijing based on InVEST model[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 17(6): 9-13, 19. ]
[29] Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes W R, et al. A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration[J]. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40(2): 89-97.
[30] 张雪峰, 牛建明, 张庆, 等. 内蒙古锡林河流域草地生态系统水源涵养功能空间格局[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(4): 814-821.
[30] [ Zhang Xuefeng, Niu Jianming, Zhang Qing, et al. Spatial pattern of water conservation function in grassland ecosystem in the Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(4): 814-821. ]
[31] Cui F O, Tang H P, Zhang Q, et al. Integrating ecosystem services supply and demand into optimized management at different soales: A case study in Hulunbuir, China[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 39: 100984, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100984.
[32] Panek E, Gozdowski D. Analysis of relationship between cereal yield and NDVl for selected regions of central Europe based on MODIS satellite data[J]. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 2020, 17: 100286, doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100286.
[33] Chen D S, Li J, Yang X N, et al. Quantifying water provision service supply, demand and spatial flow for land use optimization: A case study in the Yanhe watershed[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 43: 101117, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101117.
[34] 陶芹, 陶宇, 欧维新. 不同碳减排目标下长三角地区碳固持服务供需演变分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(1): 191-201.
[34] [ Tao Qin, Tao Yu, Ou Weixin. Mapping the changes in supply and demand of carbon sequestration services in the Yangtze River Delta under different carbon emission reduction targets[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(1): 191-201. ]
[35] 白杨, 王敏, 李晖, 等. 生态系统服务供给与需求的理论与管理方法[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(17): 5846-5852.
[35] [ Bai Yang, Wang Min, Li Hui, et al. Ecosystem service supply and demand: Theory and management application[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(17): 5846-5852. ]
[36] 刘洋, 张军, 周冬梅, 等. 基于InVEST模型的疏勒河流域碳储量时空变化研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10): 4052-4065.
[36] [ Liu Yang, Zhang Jun, Zhou Dongmei, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of carbon storage in the Shule River Basin based on InVEST model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 4052-4065. ]
[37] 魏培洁, 吴明辉, 贾映兰, 等. 基于InVEST模型的疏勒河上游产水量时空变化特征[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(15): 6418-6429.
[37] [ Wei Peijie, Wu Minghui, Jia Yinglan, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of water yield in the upstream regions of the Shule River Basin using the InVEST model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(15): 6418-6429. ]
[38] 石忆邵, 史东辉. 洞庭湖生态经济区生态服务供需平衡研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(9): 1714-1723.
[38] [ Shi Yishao, Shi Donghui. Study on the balance of ecological service supply and demand in Dongting Lake ecologica economic zone[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(9): 1714-1723. ]
[39] 杨宜男, 李敬, 王立, 等. 长三角地区城市化对典型生态系统服务供需的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(6): 1555-1571.
[39] [ Yang Yinan, Li Jing, Wang Li, et al. Impact of urbanization on supply and demand of typical ecosystem services in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(6): 1555-1571. ]
[40] 相恒星, 张健, 王宗明, 等. 松嫩平原生态系统服务供需研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8): 1769-1776.
[40] [ Xiang Hengxing, Zhang Jian, Wang Zongming, et al. Relationships between supply and demand of ecosystem services in the Songnen Plain[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(8): 1769-1776. ]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉