土地利用与碳排放

甘肃省行业碳排放影响因素及脱钩努力研究

  • 吴茜 ,
  • 陈强强
展开
  • 甘肃农业大学财经学院,甘肃 兰州 730070
吴茜(1998-),女,在读硕士,主要从事区域经济等方面的研究. E-mail: wx834754007@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-03-30

  修回日期: 2022-05-09

  网络出版日期: 2023-03-14

基金资助

国家社会科学基金项目(21BJY117)

Influencing factors and decoupling efforts of industry-related carbon emissions in Gansu Province

  • Xi WU ,
  • Qiangqiang CHEN
Expand
  • College of Economics and Management of Gansu Agriculture University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China

Received date: 2022-03-30

  Revised date: 2022-05-09

  Online published: 2023-03-14

摘要

利用LMDI模型解构了2010—2019年甘肃省13个细分行业碳排放影响因素及其作用效应,运用Tapio脱钩模型分析了经济增长与碳排放的脱钩关系,在此基础上,检验了各因素对脱钩做出的努力程度。结果表明:(1) 2010—2019年甘肃省细分行业碳排放总量增加3843.13×104 t,主要集中在石油制造业、化工制造业、钢铁制造业以及电力行业等高能耗行业;能源消费结构的高碳化特征显著,能源消费强度呈下降趋势。改善高能耗产业能源消费结构、推动高能耗产业转型升级是未来甘肃省碳减排的重点。(2) 经济增长和人口规模对碳排放产生增量效应,而能源强度、能源结构对碳排放产生减排效应,产业结构对部分行业产生减排效应。(3) 各行业碳排放与经济增长的脱钩情况趋于向好,除电力行业仍为弱脱钩外,其他行业均由2010—2016年的负脱钩或弱脱钩转变为2016—2019年的强脱钩或衰退脱钩。(4) 能源强度效应的脱钩努力最高,能源结构和产业结构效应的脱钩努力尽管较小但逐渐增强,人口规模效应的脱钩努力不明显。

本文引用格式

吴茜 , 陈强强 . 甘肃省行业碳排放影响因素及脱钩努力研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023 , 46(2) : 274 -283 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.126

Abstract

Accurate identification of specific focus points of industry carbon reduction is crucial to realize China’s goal of “carbon peak by 2030 and carbon neutral by 2060”. This study used the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method to decompose the influencing factors and their effects on the carbon emission of 13 subsectors (from 2010 to 2019) in Gansu Province. The Tapio decoupling model was used to analyze the relationship between carbon emission and economic growth. Accordingly, a decoupling effort model of influencing factors, excluding economic factors, was constructed to analyze the efforts made by other factors to decoupling. The following results are obtained. (1) From 2010 to 2019, carbon emissions for subsectors in Gansu Province increased by 3843.13×104 t, mainly in petroleum, chemical, steel, and power industries. Specifically, the energy consumption structure of Gansu Province was characterized by high carbon emissions. Coal consumption made up 64.89% of the entire fossil energy consumption in 2019. Energy consumption intensity emerged a decreasing trend, whereas energy efficiency kept improving. (2) Economic growth and population scale exhibited an incremental effect caused by the economic growth effect. Energy intensity and structure demonstrated a reduction effect, and the reduction effect of energy intensity was more significant. However, the influence direction of the industrial structure effect fluctuated greatly in different time periods and industries. The industrial structure effect on chemical and construction industries had a relatively significant reduction, whereas that on steel and power industries was increased carbon emissions. (3) The decoupling effect of carbon emissions from the economic growth of 13 subsectors improved. From 2010 to 2013, all industries exhibited a weak decoupling effect, except for mining and light manufacturing that showed negative decoupling and expansion connection. From 2013 to 2016, some industries, such as agriculture, chemical, and steel manufacturing, underwent a strong decoupling effect. From 2016 to 2019, all sectors changed to strong or recessionary decoupling, except for the power sector, which remained weak. (4) The energy intensity effect played the most important role in decoupling. Particularly, the decoupling effect of energy and industrial structures was small but gradually increasing, whereas that of the population scale was not evident. Evidently, reducing energy consumption intensity and improving energy use efficiency are crucial points to accelerate the process of carbon emission reduction and effectively enhance the decoupling level in Gansu Province. On the basis of this finding, the following should be proposed. First, governments and enterprises should actively introduce low-carbon production technologies and high-efficiency energy-saving equipment, encourage innovation, and focus on the development and optimization of energy-saving and environmental protection technologies. Second, governments should comprehensively consider the characteristics of local industrial structures, carbon emission levels, and emission reduction potentials of subsectors and then formulate differentiated quota schemes for industrial carbon emissions for high- and low-energy industries.

参考文献

[1] 刘定惠, 杨永春. 甘肃省碳排放变化的因素分解及实证分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(3): 510-516.
[1] [Liu Dinghui, Yang Yongchun. Factor decomposition and demonstration analysis of carbon emission variation in Gansu Province[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2012, 29(3): 510-516.]
[2] Ang B W, Zhang F Q, Choi K H. Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition[J]. Energy, 1998, 23(6): 489-495.
[3] 史俊晖, 戴小文. 我国省域农业隐含碳排放及其驱动因素时空动态分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(8): 169-180.
[3] [Shi Junhui, Dai Xiaowen. Spatial dynamics of agricultural embodied carbon emissions in provinces of China and the related driving factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(8): 169-180.]
[4] 王强, 伍世代, 林羽珊. 中国东南沿海地区工业能源消费碳排放的驱动因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(6): 1239-1248.
[4] [Wang Qiang, Wu Shidai, Lin Yushan. Driving factors of industrial energy consumption and carbon emissions in southeast coastal regions of China: Taking Fujian Province as a case study[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(6): 1239-1248.]
[5] 张国兴, 苏钊贤. 黄河流域交通运输碳排放的影响因素分解与情景预测[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(12): 283-294.
[5] [Zhang Guoxing, Su Zhaoxian. Analysis of influencing factors and scenario prediction of transportation carbon emissions in the Yellow Rive Basin[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(12): 283-294.]
[6] 王霞, 张丽君, 秦耀辰, 等. 中国制造业碳排放时空演变及驱动因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(2): 536-545.
[6] [Wang Xia, Zhang Lijun, Qin Yaochen, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution on the manufacturing industry’s carbon emission and its driving factor in China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(2): 536-545.]
[7] 赖文亭, 王远, 黄琳琳, 等. 福建省行业碳排放驱动因素分解及其与经济增长脱钩关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10): 3529-3538.
[7] [Lai Wenting, Wang Yuan, Huang Linlin, et al. Decomposition of driving factors of industry-related CO2 emissions and its decoupling with economic growth in Fujian Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(10): 3529-3538.]
[8] Shan Y, Huang Q, Guan D, et al. China CO2 emission accounts 2016—2017[J]. Scientific Data, 2020, 7(1): 1-9.
[9] Wang Q, Li R, Jiang R. Decoupling and decomposition analysis of carbon emissions from industry: A case study from China[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(10): 1059-1076.
[10] Engo J. Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions from economic growth in Cameroon[J]. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 2018, 25(35): 35451-35463.
[11] 黄丽, 王武林, 龚姣. 中亚五国自华进口贸易技术溢出及碳排放影响研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(3): 986-997.
[11] [Huang Li, Wang Wulin, Gong Jiao. Research on important of technology spillover from China and the impact of carbon emissions in the five Central Asian counties[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(3): 986-997.]
[12] Tapio P. Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001[J]. Transport Policy, 2005, 12(2): 137-151.
[13] 李明煜, 张诗卉, 王灿, 等. 重点工业行业碳排放现状与减排定位分析[J]. 中国环境管理, 2021, 13(3): 28-39.
[13] [Li Mingyu, Zhang Shihui, Wang Can, et al. The carbon emission status and emission reduction positioning of key industrial sectors[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 13(3): 28-39.]
[14] 王君华, 李霞. 中国工业行业经济增长与CO2排放的脱钩效应[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(5): 105-110.
[14] [Wang Junhua, Li Xia. The effect of sector decoupling between China’s industrial economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(5): 105-110.]
[15] 刘博文, 张贤, 杨琳. 基于LMDI的区域产业碳排放脱钩努力研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(4): 78-86.
[15] [Liu Bowen, Zhang Xian, Yang Lin. Decoupling efforts of regional industrial development on CO2 emissions in China based on LMDI analysis[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(4): 78-86.]
[16] 贺勇, 傅飞飞, 廖诺. 基于STIRPAT模型的工业研发投入对碳排放影响效应分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(17): 206-212.
[16] [He Yong, Fu Feifei, Liao Nuo. Analysis on the effect of R&D investment on carbon emission in industrial sector based on STIRPAT model[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41(17): 206-212.]
[17] 董莹, 许宝荣, 华中, 等. 基于LMDI的甘肃省碳排放影响因素分解研究[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 56(5): 606-614.
[17] [Dong Ying, Xu Baorong, Hua Zhong, et al. Factor decomposition of carbon emission in Gansu Province based on LMDI[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(5): 606-614.]
[18] 陈向阳. 碳排放权交易和碳税的作用机制、比较与制度选择[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2022(1): 75-86.
[18] [Chen Xiangyang. Mechanism of carbon emission trading and carbon tax, comparison and system selection[J]. Fujian Tribune, 2022(1): 75-86.]
[19] 王勇, 毕莹, 王恩东. 中国工业碳排放达峰的情景预测与减排潜力评估[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(10): 131-140.
[19] [Wang Yong, Bi Ying, Wang Endong. Scene prediction of carbon emission peak and emission reduction potential estimation in Chinese industry[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(10): 131-140.]
[20] 董棒棒, 李莉, 唐洪松, 等. 环境规制、FDI与能源消费碳排放峰值预测——以西北五省为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(3): 689-697.
[20] [Dong Bangbang, Li Li, Tang Hongsong, et al. Environmental regulation, FDI and energy consumption peak carbon emissions forecast: A case of five provinces in northwest China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(3): 689-697.]
文章导航

/